Filtern
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (2)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (2)
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (2)
Sprache
- Englisch (2)
Schlagworte
- Auswertung (2) (entfernen)
Institut
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (2) (entfernen)
DNA microarrays have become a standard technique to assess the mRNA levels for complete genomes. To identify significantly regulated genes from these large amounts of data a wealth of methods has been developed. Despite this, the functional interpretation (i.e. deducing biological hypothesis from the data) still remains a major bottleneck in microarray data analysis. Most available methods display the set of significant genes in long lists, from which common functional properties have to be extracted. This is not only a tedious and time-consuming task, which becomes less and less feasible with increasing numbers of experimental conditions, but is also prone to errors, since it is commonly done by eye. In the course of this work methods have been developed and tested, that allow for a computerbased analysis of functional properties being relevant in the given experimental setting. To this end the Gene Ontology was chosen as an appropriate source of annotation data, because it combines human-readability with computer-accessibility of the annotations term and thus allows for a statistical analysis of functional properties. Here the gene-annotations are integrated in a Correspondence Analysis which allows to visualize genes, hybridizations and functional categories in a single plot. Due to the increasing amounts of available annotations and the fact that in most settings only few functional processes are differentially regulated, several filter criteria have been developed to reduce the number of displayed annotations to a set being relevant in the given experimental setting. The applicability of the presented visualization and filtering have both been validated on datasets of varying complexity. Starting from the well studied glucose-pathway in S. cerevisiae up to the comparison of different tumor types in human. In both settings the method generated well interpretable plots, which allowed for an immediate identification of the major functional differences between the experimental conditions [90]. While the integration of annotation data like GO facilitates functional interpretation, it lacks the capability to identify key regulatory elements. To facilitate such an analysis, the occurrence of transcription factor binding sites in upstream regions of genes has been integrated to the analysis as well. Again this methodology was biologically validated on S. cerevisiae as well human cancer data sets. In both settings TFs known to exhibit central roles for the observed transcriptional changes were plotted in marked positions and thus could be immediately identified [206]. In essence, integration of supplementary information in Correspondence Analysis visualizes genes, hybridizations and annotation data in a single, well interpretable plot. This allows for an intuitive identification of relevant annotations even in complex experimental settings. The presented approach is not limited to the shown types of data, but is generalizable to account for the majority of the available annotation data.
Background: The frequency of the most observed cancer, Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL), is further rising. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common of the NHLs. There are two subgroups of DLBCL with different gene expression patterns: ABC (“Activated B-like DLBCL”) and GCB (“Germinal Center B-like DLBCL”). Without therapy the patients often die within a few months, the ABC type exhibits the more aggressive behaviour. A further B-cell lymphoma is the Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). It is rare and shows very poor prognosis. There is no cure yet. Methods: In this project these B-cell lymphomas were examined with methods from bioinformatics, to find new characteristics or undiscovered events on the molecular level. This would improve understanding and therapy of lymphomas. For this purpose we used survival, gene expression and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data. In some clinical studies, you get large data sets, from which one can reveal yet unknown trends. Results (MCL): The published proliferation signature correlates directly with survival. Exploratory analyses of gene expression and CGH data of MCL samples (n=71) revealed a valid grouping according to the median of the proliferation signature values. The second axis of correspondence analysis distinguishes between good and bad prognosis. Statistical testing (moderate t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) showed differences in the cell cycle and delivered a network of kinases, which are responsible for the difference between good and bad prognosis. A set of seven genes (CENPE, CDC20, HPRT1, CDC2, BIRC5, ASPM, IGF2BP3) predicted, similarly well, survival patterns as proliferation signature with 20 genes. Furthermore, some bands could be associated with prognosis in the explorative analysis (chromosome 9: 9p24, 9p23, 9p22, 9p21, 9q33 and 9q34). Results (DLBCL): New normalization of gene expression data of DLBCL patients revealed better separation of risk groups by the 2002 published signature based predictor. We could achieve, similarly well, a separation with six genes. Exploratory analysis of gene expression data could confirm the subgroups ABC and GCB. We recognized a clear difference in early and late cell cycle stages of cell cycle genes, which can separate ABC and GCB. Classical lymphoma and best separating genes form a network, which can classify and explain the ABC and GCB groups. Together with gene sets which identify ABC and GCB we get a network, which can classify and explain the ABC and GCB groups (ASB13, BCL2, BCL6, BCL7A, CCND2, COL3A1, CTGF, FN1, FOXP1, IGHM, IRF4, LMO2, LRMP, MAPK10, MME, MYBL1, NEIL1 and SH3BP5; Altogether these findings are useful for diagnosis, prognosis and therapy (cytostatic drugs).