@article{Niemack2019,
  author    = {Niemack, Juliane},
  title     = {Schutzfaktoren bei Kindern vor dem {\"U}bergang in die Sekundarstufe - Ergebnisse aus der STRESSStudie},
  series = {Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung / Discourse. Journal of Childhood and Adolescence Research},
  volume    = {2019},
  journal   = {Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung / Discourse. Journal of Childhood and Adolescence Research},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.3224/diskurs.v14i1.05},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-268788},
  pages     = {73-94},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Der {\"U}bergang in die Sekundarstufe stellt f{\"u}r Kinder ein normativ kritisches Lebensereignis dar, das unterschiedlich bewertet und bew{\"a}ltigt wird. Der vorliegende Beitrag befasst sich mit der Frage, welche Schutzfaktoren dazu beitragen, dass Kinder dem {\"U}bergang mit Gef{\"u}hlen der Vorfreude begegnen und sie dieses Ereignis problemorientiert bew{\"a}ltigen. Untersucht werden 596 Viertkl{\"a}sslerInnen aus Bayern und Hessen vor dem {\"U}bergang in die Sekundarstufe. In Anlehnung an die kognitiv-transaktionale Theorie von Lazarus und Folkman (1984) werden die Zusammenh{\"a}nge von prim{\"a}rer Bewertung als Herausforderung und problemorientierter Stressbew{\"a}ltigung unter Ber{\"u}cksichtigung von personalen (akademisches Selbstkonzept, Selbstwirksamkeit) und sozialen Schutzfaktoren (Familienzusammenhalt, allgemeines f{\"o}rderndes Elternverhalten) analysiert. Mithilfe von Strukturgleichungsmodellen lassen sich Mediationseffekte der Schutzfaktoren nachweisen. Insbesondere das akademische Selbstkonzept und ein f{\"o}rderliches Familienumfeld erweisen sich als bedeutsame protektive Faktoren in der Phase vor dem {\"U}bergang.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KuhlmannHussBuergeretal.2016,
  author    = {Kuhlmann, S.M. and Huss, M. and B{\"u}rger, A. and Hammerle, F.},
  title     = {Coping with stress in medical students: results of a randomized controlled trial using a mindfulness-based stress prevention training (MediMind) in Germany},
  series = {BMC Medical Education},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {BMC Medical Education},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12909-016-0833-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164593},
  pages     = {316},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background High prevalence rates of psychological distress in medical training and later professional life indicate a need for prevention. Different types of intervention were shown to have good effects, but little is known about the relative efficacy of different types of stress management interventions, and methodological limitations have been reported. In order to overcome some of these limitations, the present study aimed at evaluating the effect of a specifically developed mindfulness-based stress prevention training for medical students (MediMind) on measures of distress, coping and psychological morbidity. Methods We report on a prospective randomized controlled trial with three study conditions: experimental treatment (MediMind), standard treatment (Autogenic Training) and a control group without treatment. The sample consisted of medical or dental students in the second or eighth semester. They completed self-report questionnaires at baseline, after the training and at one year follow-up. Distress (Trier Inventory for the Assessment of Chronic Stress, TICS) was assessed as the primary outcome and coping (Brief COPE) as a co-primary outcome. Effects on the psychological morbidity (Brief Symptom Inventory, BSI) as a secondary outcome were expected one year after the trainings. Results Initially, N = 183 students were randomly allocated to the study groups. At one year follow-up N = 80 could be included into the per-protocol analysis: MediMind (n =31), Autogenic Training (n = 32) and control group (n = 17). A selective drop-out for students who suffered more often from psychological symptoms was detected (p = .020). MANCOVA's on TICS and Brief COPE revealed no significant interaction effects. On the BSI, a significant overall interaction effect became apparent (p = .002, η2partial = .382), but post hoc analyses were not significant. Means of the Global Severity Index (BSI) indicated that MediMind may contribute to a decrease in psychological morbidity. Conclusion Due to the high and selective dropout rates, the results cannot be generalized and further research is necessary. Since the participation rate of the trainings was high, a need for further prevention programs is indicated. The study gives important suggestions on further implementation and evaluation of stress prevention in medical schools.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WeyersJankeMachtetal.1993,
  author    = {Weyers, P. and Janke, W. and Macht, Michael and Weijers, H.-G.},
  title     = {Social and nonsocial open field behaviour of rats under light and noise stimulation},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-61246},
  year      = {1993},
  abstract  = {ln two experiments, male rats were observed in pairs under different environmental stimulations in an open field. ln Experiment 1, white noise of 85 dB(A) reduced social activities and increased defecation compared to 75 dB(A) and 65 dß(A). ln Experiment 2, the illumination of the open field was varied in addition to a variation of the noise intensity. Again, 85 dB(A) as compared to 50 dB(A) reduced social activities and increased defecation, but also led to changes in non-social behaviours such as sniffing, grooming, and rearing. ln contrast, 400 lx did not differ substantially in its effects from 40 lx in any of the observed behavioural categories. Altogether, the behaviour pattern under 85 dß(A) white noise cannot satisfactorily be explained only by increased anxiety or fear. Alternative explanations are discussed.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}