@article{WeberBeckKlugetal.2023,
  author    = {Weber, Patrick and Beck, Melina and Klug, Michael and Klug, Andreas and Klug, Alexander and Glowalla, Claudio and Gollwitzer, Hans},
  title     = {Survival of patient-specific unicondylar knee replacement},
  series = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {2075-4426},
  doi       = {10.3390/jpm13040665},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-313650},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in isolated medial or lateral osteoarthritis leads to good clinical results. However, revision rates are higher in comparison to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One reason is suboptimal fitting of conventional off-the-shelf prostheses, and major overhang of the tibial component over the bone has been reported in up to 20\% of cases. In this retrospective study, a total of 537 patient-specific UKAs (507 medial prostheses and 30 lateral prostheses) that had been implanted in 3 centers over a period of 10 years were analyzed for survival, with a minimal follow-up of 1 year (range 12 to 129 months). Furthermore, fitting of the UKAs was analyzed on postoperative X-rays, and tibial overhang was quantified. A total of 512 prostheses were available for follow-up (95.3\%). Overall survival rate (medial and lateral) of the prostheses after 5 years was 96\%. The 30 lateral UKAs showed a survival rate of 100\% at 5 years. The tibial overhang of the prosthesis was smaller than 1 mm in 99\% of cases. In comparison to the reported results in the literature, our data suggest that the patient-specific implant design used in this study is associated with an excellent midterm survival rate, particularly in the lateral knee compartment, and confirms excellent fitting.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WeissenbergerHeinzRueckletal.2020,
  author    = {Weissenberger, Manuel and Heinz, Tizian and Rueckl, Kilian and Rudert, Maximilian and Klug, Alexander and Hoffmann, Reinhard and Schmidt-Horloh{\´e}, Kay},
  title     = {No functional differences in anatomic reconstruction with one vs. two suture anchors after non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps brachii tendon rupture: a case report and review of the literature},
  series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12891-020-03304-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229266},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background Surgical reattachment of the tendon is still the gold standard for ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Several fixation techniques have been described in the literature, with suture anchors being one of the most common fixation techniques. Currently, there is no data available on how many anchors are required for a safe and stable refixation. In this case report clinical data of a patient with non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps tendon ruptures treated with a different number of suture anchors for each side (one vs. two) are demonstrated. Case presentation A 47-year-old factory worker suffered a rupture of the distal biceps tendon on both arms following two different occasions. The left side was fixed using a single suture anchor, while refixation on the right side was performed with two anchors. The patient was prospectively followed for one year. Functional outcome was assessed using the Andrews Carson Score (ACS), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score after six, twelve, 24 and 48 weeks. Furthermore, an isokinetic strength measurement for flexion strength was performed after 24 and 48 weeks. After 48 weeks the patient presented with excellent functional outcome scores and no follow-up complications. During the follow-up period, no differences in the functional scores nor in the isokinetic flexion strength measurement could be detected. Furthermore, no radiological complications (like heterotopic ossifications) could be detected in the postoperative radiographs after one year. Conclusions Anatomic reattachment of the distal biceps tendon is a successful operative treatment option for distal biceps tendon ruptures. Suture anchor fixation remains one of the most common techniques, as it allows fast surgery and provides good results with respect to range of motion (ROM) and functional scoring according to the current literature. However, the number of anchors required for a stable fixation remains unclear. As indicated by our presented case, we hypothesize, that there are no significant differences between a one-point or a two-point fixation. In the presented case report, no intraindividual differences between the usage of one versus two suture anchors were evident in the short-term follow-up.},
  language  = {en}
}