@phdthesis{Held2024,
  author    = {Held, Helena},
  title     = {The effectiveness of non-occlusal therapies in relation to the chronicity of temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-34799},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-347990},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Background: That a differentiated treatment of subjects with low and high levels of disabling pain might be necessarily has only been suspected but not sufficiently confirmed so far. Furthermore, the effectiveness of extraoral therapy methods for TMD is still controversial in the literature. The present work could make an important contribution to this. Objectives: Five systematic reviews with meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the efficacy of extraoral therapies (acupuncture, laser, medication, psychosocial interventions, and physiotherapy) in the treatment of TMD in relation to the degree of chronicity of pain. Literature sources: With this objective, the databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Livivo, OpenGrey, drks.de, Clinicaltrials.gov. were searched. Criteria for the selection of suitable studies: Adults suffering from painful TMD and treated with either acupuncture, laser, medication, psychosocial interventions, or physiotherapy. The studies were then examined for evidence in the subjects' characteristics suggesting that they were suffering from chronic TMD in terms of pain dysfunction. These included a high score on the GCPS, resistance to undergone treatments, multilocular pain, depression, and regular use of pain medication. The effectiveness of the five interventions was then differentiated according to the suspected degree of chronicity. Effectiveness was assessed by the following outcomes: patient- related current pain intensity, MMO, pain on palpation, temporomandibular joint sounds, depression, and somatization. Study evaluation: After the assessment of the studies, the quality assessment (Risk of Bias Tool of the Cochrane Institute) and the extraction of the data were conducted. After that five meta-analyses were carried out for each of the five interventions using the Review Manager of the Cochrane Institute (RevMan 5.3) Results: Acupuncture and dry needling were statistically significantly more effective in providing short-term pain relief compared to the control group in patients with low disability pain (p=0.04) and (p=0.02), respectively. Acupuncture or dry needling did not show a significant result in the improvement of MMO in the short-term period. Laser therapy is more effective in relieving pain (p<0.0001) and functional outcomes (p=0.03) in the short term compared to placebo for low disability pain. Botulinum toxin (p=0.003) and NSAIDs (p=0.03) showed significantly better short-term improvement in pain intensity for high disability pain. Low disability pain is significantly better treated by psychosocial interventions than by other treatments in terms of long-term pain relief (more than 12 months) (p=0.02). Patients with high disability pain had significantly lower depression scores after psychosocial interventions than after other treatments (p=0.008). Physiotherapy showed a statistically significant short-term analgesic effect in patients with high disability pain compared to placebo (p=0.04). Manual Therapy (MT) showed a statistically significant short-term analgesic effect in high disability pain compared to the control group (p=0.01). Patients with low disability pain showed a statistically significant short-term pain-relieving effect with the single intervention of MT in combination with exercise compared to the control groups (p=0.003). A statistically significant result in the improvement of MMO was found in the short-term period in low disability pain for the single interventions of physiotherapy (p=0.008) and physiotherapy in combination with another treatment compared to other treatments (p=0.03), MT compared to the control group (p=0.03) and physiotherapy compared to splint therapy (p=0.03). Clinical conclusion: Individual interventions of the five extraoral therapies confirm the hypothesis that painful TMDs respond differently to established therapies depending on the degree of chronic pain-related disability and that the prognosis of therapy is significantly influenced by the degree of chronic pain- related disability of the condition, according to the GCPS. Registration number of the review at PROSPERO: CRD42020202558 Keywords: meta-analysis, systematic review, temporomandibular disorders, extra oral therapy, acupuncture, laser, medication, psychosocial interventions, physiotherapy, low disability, high disability, pain, chronification},
  subject      = {Metaanalyse},
  language  = {en}
}