@article{GernerAghaiTrommeschlaegerKrausetal.2022,
  author    = {Gerner, Bettina and Aghai-Trommeschlaeger, Fatemeh and Kraus, Sabrina and Grigoleit, G{\"o}tz Ulrich and Zimmermann, Sebastian and Kurlbaum, Max and Klinker, Hartwig and Isberner, Nora and Scherf-Clavel, Oliver},
  title     = {A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model of ruxolitinib and posaconazole to predict CYP3A4-mediated drug-drug interaction frequently observed in graft versus host disease patients},
  series = {Pharmaceutics},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Pharmaceutics},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {1999-4923},
  doi       = {10.3390/pharmaceutics14122556},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-297261},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD). It is predominantly metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. As patients with GvHD have an increased risk of invasive fungal infections, RUX is frequently combined with posaconazole (POS), a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Knowledge of RUX exposure under concomitant POS treatment is scarce and recommendations on dose modifications are inconsistent. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to investigate the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between POS and RUX. The predicted RUX exposure was compared to observed concentrations in patients with GvHD in the clinical routine. PBPK models for RUX and POS were independently set up using PK-Sim\(^®\) Version 11. Plasma concentration-time profiles were described successfully and all predicted area under the curve (AUC) values were within 2-fold of the observed values. The increase in RUX exposure was predicted with a DDI ratio of 1.21 (C\(_{max}\)) and 1.59 (AUC). Standard dosing in patients with GvHD led to higher RUX exposure than expected, suggesting further dose reduction if combined with POS. The developed model can serve as a starting point for further simulations of the implemented DDI and can be extended to further perpetrators of CYP-mediated PK-DDIs or disease-specific physiological changes.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{IsbernerKrausGrigoleitetal.2021,
  author    = {Isberner, Nora and Kraus, Sabrina and Grigoleit, G{\"o}tz Ulrich and Aghai, Fatemeh and Kurlbaum, Max and Zimmermann, Sebastian and Klinker, Hartwig and Scherf-Clavel, Oliver},
  title     = {Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice-a prospective single-center trial},
  series = {Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology},
  volume    = {88},
  journal   = {Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {1432-0843},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00280-021-04351-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266476},
  pages     = {973-983},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Purpose Knowledge on Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD) is scarce. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze Ruxolitinib concentrations of GvHD patients and to investigate effects of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 inhibitors and other covariates as well as concentration-dependent effects. Methods 262 blood samples of 29 patients with acute or chronic GvHD who were administered Ruxolitinib during clinical routine were analyzed. A population pharmacokinetic model obtained from myelofibrosis patients was adapted to our population and was used to identify relevant pharmacokinetic properties and covariates on drug exposure. Relationships between Ruxolitinib exposure and adverse events were assessed. Results Median of individual mean trough serum concentrations was 39.9 ng/mL at 10 mg twice daily (IQR 27.1 ng/mL, range 5.6-99.8 ng/mL). Applying a population pharmacokinetic model revealed that concentrations in our cohort were significantly higher compared to myelofibrosis patients receiving the same daily dose (p < 0.001). Increased Ruxolitinib exposure was caused by a significant reduction in Ruxolitinib clearance by approximately 50\%. Additional comedication with at least one strong CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitor led to a further reduction by 15\% (p < 0.05). No other covariate affected pharmacokinetics significantly. Mean trough concentrations of patients requiring dose reduction related to adverse events were significantly elevated (p < 0.05). Conclusion Ruxolitinib exposure is increased in GvHD patients in comparison to myelofibrosis patients due to reduced clearance and comedication with CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitors. Elevated Ruxolitinib trough concentrations might be a surrogate for toxicity.},
  language  = {en}
}