@article{BoelchJansenMeffertetal.2015,
  author    = {Boelch, S. P. and Jansen, H. and Meffert, R. H. and Frey, S. P.},
  title     = {Six Sesamoid Bones on Both Feet: Report of a Rare Case},
  series = {Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.7860/JCDR/2015/12842.6394},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126073},
  pages     = {RD04-RD05},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {There is a variation of the total number of distinct bones in the human in the literature. This difference is mainly caused by the variable existence of sesamoid bones. Sesamoid bones at the first MTP are seen regularly. In contrast additional sesamoid bones at the divond to fifth MTP are rare. We report a case of additional sesamoid bones at every metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) of both feet. A 22-year-old female Caucasian presented with weight-dependent pain of the divond MTP of the left foot. In the radiographs of both feet additional sesamoid bones at every MTP could be seen. This case reports a very rare variation in human anatomy. A similar case has not been displayed to the academic society and therefore should be acknowledged.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BoelchJakuscheitDoerriesetal.2018,
  author    = {Boelch, S. P. and Jakuscheit, A. and Doerries, S. and Fraissler, L. and Hoberg, M. and Arnholdt, J. and Rudert, M.},
  title     = {Periprosthetic infection is the major indication for TKA revision - experiences from a university referral arthroplasty center},
  series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  number    = {395},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12891-018-2314-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176983},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: We hypothesized, that periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) accounts for the major proportion of first (primary) and repeated (secondary) Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions at our university referral arthroplasty center. Methods: One thousand one hundred forty-three revisions, performed between 2008 and 2016 were grouped into primary (55\%) and secondary (45\%) revisions. The rate of revision indications was calculated and indications were categorized by time after index operation. The odds ratios of the indications for primary versus secondary revision were calculated. Results: In the primary revision group PJI accounted for 22.3\%, instability for 20.0\%, aseptic loosening for 14.9\% and retropatellar arthrosis for 14.2\%. PJI (25.6\%) was the most common indication up to 1 year after implantation, retropatellar arthrosis (26.8\%) 1-3 years and aseptic loosening (25.6\%) more than 3 years after implantation. In the secondary revision group PJI accounted for 39.7\%, aseptic loosening for 16.2\% and instability for 13.2\%. PJI was the most common indication at any time of revision with 43.8\% up to one, 35.4\% 1-3 years and 39.4\% more the 3 years after index operation. The odds ratios in repeated revision were 2.32 times higher (p = 0.000) for PJI. For instability and retropatellar arthrosis the odds ratios were 0.60 times (p = 0.006) and 0.22 times (p = 0.000) lower. Conclusions: PJI is the most common indication for secondary TKA revision and within one year after primary TKA. Aseptical failures such as instability, retropatellar arthrosis and aseptical loosening are the predominant reasons for revision more than one year after primary TKA.},
  language  = {en}
}