@article{SchmidtAbinzanoMensingaetal.2020,
  author    = {Schmidt, Stefanie and Abinzano, Florencia and Mensinga, Anneloes and Teßmar, J{\"o}rg and Groll, J{\"u}rgen and Malda, Jos and Levato, Riccardo and Blunk, Torsten},
  title     = {Differential production of cartilage ECM in 3D agarose constructs by equine articular cartilage progenitor cells and mesenchymal stromal cells},
  series = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  number    = {19},
  issn      = {1422-0067},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijms21197071},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-236180},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Identification of articular cartilage progenitor cells (ACPCs) has opened up new opportunities for cartilage repair. These cells may be used as alternatives for or in combination with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in cartilage engineering. However, their potential needs to be further investigated, since only a few studies have compared ACPCs and MSCs when cultured in hydrogels. Therefore, in this study, we compared chondrogenic differentiation of equine ACPCs and MSCs in agarose constructs as monocultures and as zonally layered co-cultures under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. ACPCs and MSCs exhibited distinctly differential production of the cartilaginous extracellular matrix (ECM). For ACPC constructs, markedly higher glycosaminoglycan (GAG) contents were determined by histological and quantitative biochemical evaluation, both in normoxia and hypoxia. Differential GAG production was also reflected in layered co-culture constructs. For both cell types, similar staining for type II collagen was detected. However, distinctly weaker staining for undesired type I collagen was observed in the ACPC constructs. For ACPCs, only very low alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, a marker of terminal differentiation, was determined, in stark contrast to what was found for MSCs. This study underscores the potential of ACPCs as a promising cell source for cartilage engineering.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DiloksumpandeRuijterCastilhoetal.2020,
  author    = {Diloksumpan, Paweena and de Ruijter, Myl{\`e}ne and Castilho, Miguel and Gbureck, Uwe and Vermonden, Tina and van Weeren, P Ren{\´e} and Malda, Jos and Levato, Riccardo},
  title     = {Combining multi-scale 3D printing technologies to engineer reinforced hydrogel-ceramic interfaces},
  series = {Biofabrication},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Biofabrication},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1088/1758-5090/ab69d9},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-254005},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Multi-material 3D printing technologies that resolve features at different lengths down to the microscale open new avenues for regenerative medicine, particularly in the engineering of tissue interfaces. Herein, extrusion printing of a bone-biomimetic ceramic ink and melt electrowriting (MEW) of spatially organized polymeric microfibres are integrated for the biofabrication of an osteochondral plug, with a mechanically reinforced bone-to-cartilage interface. A printable physiological temperature-setting bioceramic, based on α-tricalcium phosphate, nanohydroxyapatite and a custom-synthesized biodegradable and crosslinkable poloxamer, was developed as bone support. The mild setting reaction of the bone ink enabled us to print directly within melt electrowritten polycaprolactone meshes, preserving their micro-architecture. Ceramic-integrated MEW meshes protruded into the cartilage region of the composite plug, and were embedded with mechanically soft gelatin-based hydrogels, laden with articular cartilage chondroprogenitor cells. Such interlocking design enhanced the hydrogel-to-ceramic adhesion strength >6.5-fold, compared with non-interlocking fibre architectures, enabling structural stability during handling and surgical implantation in osteochondral defects ex vivo. Furthermore, the MEW meshes endowed the chondral compartment with compressive properties approaching those of native cartilage (20-fold reinforcement versus pristine hydrogel). The osteal and chondral compartment supported osteogenesis and cartilage matrix deposition in vitro, and the neo-synthesized cartilage matrix further contributed to the mechanical reinforcement at the ceramic-hydrogel interface. This multi-material, multi-scale 3D printing approach provides a promising strategy for engineering advanced composite constructs for the regeneration of musculoskeletal and connective tissue interfaces.},
  language  = {en}
}