@inproceedings{SchwaneckWelgeBoppetal.2010, author = {Schwaneck, Stefan and Welge, Christopher and Bopp, Ann-Kathrin and Faulhaber, Sarah and Hampel, Susanne and Pfletschinger, Maike and Nebelung, Lisa and Hamme, Berit and Priddat, Birger and Salmen, Thomas and Rosenthal, Georg and Neumann, Bernd and Deeg, Steffen and Buytendijk, Frank and Gonzalez, Thomas and Tr{\"a}ger, Gloria and Mayer, Benjamin and Mohamad, Christoph and Reinders, Heinz and Bohmeier, Bernhard}, title = {Chef, lass uns mal Kultur machen! Festschrift zum 6. W{\"u}rzburger Wirtschaftssymposium}, organization = {6. W{\"u}rzburger Wirtschaftssymposium 2010}, isbn = {978-3-923959-66-2}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-53329}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Am Montag, den 29. November 2010 fand das 6. W{\"u}rzburger Wirtschaftssymposium unter dem Leitmotiv "Chef, lass uns mal Kultur machen!" statt. Die gemeinn{\"u}tzige Veranstaltung versteht sich seit jeher als Ort der Begegnung und des gemeinsamen Gedankenaustauschs, Studenten und Mitarbeiter aller Fachbereiche nahmen ebenso teil wie interessierte B{\"u}rger außerhalb der W{\"u}rzburger Hochschulen. Die Festschrift enth{\"a}lt Interviews mit sowie Gastbeitr{\"a}ge von Referenten des 6. W{\"u}rzburger Wirtschaftssymposiums. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus greifen Gastbeitr{\"a}ge von Experten aus Wissenschaft, Wirtschaft, Politik und Gesellschaft weitere Facetten auf und stellen das Thema damit auf eine breitere Grundlage.}, subject = {Festschrift}, language = {de} } @article{MeierMoebusHeigletal.2023, author = {Meier, Johannes P. and M{\"o}bus, Selina and Heigl, Florian and Asbach-Nitzsche, Alexandra and Niller, Hans Helmut and Plentz, Annelie and Avsar, Korkut and Heiß-Neumann, Marion and Schaaf, Bernhard and Cassens, Uwe and Seese, Bernd and Teschner, Daniel and Handzhiev, Sabin and Graf, Uwe and L{\"u}bbert, Christoph and Steinmaurer, Monika and Kontogianni, Konstantina and Berg, Christoph and Maieron, Andreas and Blaas, Stefan H. and Wagner, Ralf and Deml, Ludwig and Barabas, Sascha}, title = {Performance of T-Track\(^®\) TB, a novel dual marker RT-qPCR-based whole-blood test for improved detection of active tuberculosis}, series = {Diagnostics}, volume = {13}, journal = {Diagnostics}, number = {4}, issn = {2075-4418}, doi = {10.3390/diagnostics13040758}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-304113}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the leading causes of death by an infectious disease. It remains a major health burden worldwide, in part due to misdiagnosis. Therefore, improved diagnostic tests allowing the faster and more reliable diagnosis of patients with active TB are urgently needed. This prospective study examined the performance of the new molecular whole-blood test T-Track\(^®\) TB, which relies on the combined evaluation of IFNG and CXCL10 mRNA levels, and compared it to that of the QuantiFERON\(^®\)-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Diagnostic accuracy and agreement analyses were conducted on the whole blood of 181 active TB patients and 163 non-TB controls. T-Track\(^®\) TB presented sensitivity of 94.9\% and specificity of 93.8\% for the detection of active TB vs. non-TB controls. In comparison, the QFT-Plus ELISA showed sensitivity of 84.3\%. The sensitivity of T-Track\(^®\) TB was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of QFT-Plus. The overall agreement of T-Track\(^®\) TB with QFT-Plus to diagnose active TB was 87.9\%. Out of 21 samples with discordant results, 19 were correctly classified by T-Track\(^®\) TB while misclassified by QFT-Plus (T-Track\(^®\) TB-positive/QFT-Plus-negative), and two samples were misclassified by T-Track\(^®\) TB while correctly classified by QFT-Plus (T-Track\(^®\) TB-negative/QFT-Plus-positive). Our results demonstrate the excellent performance of the T-Track\(^®\) TB molecular assay and its suitability to accurately detect TB infection and discriminate active TB patients from non-infected controls.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmidbauerFerseSalihetal.2022, author = {Schmidbauer, Moritz L. and Ferse, Caroline and Salih, Farid and Klingner, Carsten and Musleh, Rita and Kunst, Stefan and Wittstock, Matthias and Neumann, Bernhard and Schebesch, Karl-Michael and B{\"o}sel, Julian and Godau, Jana and Lochner, Piergiorgio and Adam, Elisabeth H. and Jahnke, Kolja and Knier, Benjamin and Schirotzek, Ingo and M{\"u}llges, Wolfgang and Notz, Quirin and Dengl, Markus and G{\"u}ldner, Andreas and Onur, Oezguer A. and Garcia Borrega, Jorge and Dimitriadis, Konstantinos and G{\"u}nther, Albrecht}, title = {COVID-19 and intracranial hemorrhage: a multicenter case series, systematic review and pooled analysis}, series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, volume = {11}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, number = {3}, issn = {2077-0383}, doi = {10.3390/jcm11030605}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-255236}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) profoundly impacts hemostasis and microvasculature. In the light of the dilemma between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, in the present paper, we systematically investigate the prevalence, mortality, radiological subtypes, and clinical characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the literature by screening the PubMed database and included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitant ICH. We performed a pooled analysis, including a prospectively collected cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients with ICH, as part of the PANDEMIC registry (Pooled Analysis of Neurologic Disorders Manifesting in Intensive Care of COVID-19). Results: Our literature review revealed a total of 217 citations. After the selection process, 79 studies and a total of 477 patients were included. The median age was 58.8 years. A total of 23.3\% of patients experienced the critical stage of COVID-19, 62.7\% of patients were on anticoagulation and 27.5\% of the patients received ECMO. The prevalence of ICH was at 0.85\% and the mortality at 52.18\%, respectively. Conclusion: ICH in COVID-19 patients is rare, but it has a very poor prognosis. Different subtypes of ICH seen in COVID-19, support the assumption of heterogeneous and multifaceted pathomechanisms contributing to ICH in COVID-19. Further clinical and pathophysiological investigations are warranted to resolve the conflict between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in the future.}, language = {en} }