@article{SausseleHehlmannFabariusetal.2018,
  author    = {Saussele, Susanne and Hehlmann, Ruediger and Fabarius, Alice and Jeromin, Sabine and Proetel, Ulrike and Rinaldetti, Sebastien and Kohlbrenner, Katharina and Einsele, Hermann and Falge, Christine and Kanz, Lothar and Neubauer, Andreas and Kneba, Michael and Stegelmann, Frank and Pfreundschuh, Michael and Waller, Cornelius F. and Oppliger Leibundgut, Elisabeth and Heim, Dominik and Krause, Stefan W. and Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten and Hasford, Joerg and Pfirrmann, Markus and M{\"u}ller, Martin C. and Hochhaus, Andreas and Lauseker, Michael},
  title     = {Defining therapy goals for major molecular remission in chronic myeloid leukemia: results of the randomized CML Study IV},
  series = {Leukemia},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Leukemia},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41375-018-0055-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227528},
  pages     = {1222-1228},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Major molecular remission (MMR) is an important therapy goal in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). So far, MMR is not a failure criterion according to ELN management recommendation leading to uncertainties when to change therapy in CML patients not reaching MMR after 12 months. At monthly landmarks, for different molecular remission status Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for patients registered to CML study IV who were divided in a learning and a validation sample. The minimum HR for MMR was found at 2.5 years with 0.28 (compared to patients without remission). In the validation sample, a significant advantage for progression-free survival (PFS) for patients in MMR could be detected (p-value 0.007). The optimal time to predict PFS in patients with MMR could be validated in an independent sample at 2.5 years. With our model we provide a suggestion when to define lack of MMR as therapy failure and thus treatment change should be considered. The optimal response time for 1\% BCR-ABL at about 12-15 months was confirmed and for deep molecular remission no specific time point was detected. Nevertheless, it was demonstrated that the earlier the MMR is achieved the higher is the chance to attain deep molecular response later.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GirschickWolfMorbachetal.2015,
  author    = {Girschick, Hermann and Wolf, Christine and Morbach, Henner and Hertzberg, Christoph and Lee-Kirsch, Min Ae},
  title     = {Severe immune dysregulation with neurological impairment and minor bone changes in a child with spondyloenchondrodysplasia due to two novel mutations in the ACP5 gene},
  series = {Pediatric Rheumatology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Pediatric Rheumatology},
  number    = {37},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12969-015-0035-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-149990},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Spondyloenchondrodysplasia (SPENCD) is a rare skeletal dysplasia, characterized by metaphyseal lesions, neurological impairment and immune dysregulation associated with lupus-like features. SPENCD is caused by biallelic mutations in the ACP5 gene encoding tartrate-resistant phosphatase. We report on a child, who presented with spasticity, multisystem inflammation, autoimmunity and immunodeficiency with minimal metaphyseal changes due to compound heterozygosity for two novel ACP5 mutations. These findings extend the phenotypic spectrum of SPENCD and indicate that ACP5 mutations can cause severe immune dysregulation and neurological impairment even in the absence of metaphyseal dysplasia.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AndreskaLueningschroerWolfetal.2023,
  author    = {Andreska, Thomas and L{\"u}ningschr{\"o}r, Patrick and Wolf, Daniel and McFleder, Rhonda L. and Ayon-Olivas, Maurilyn and Rattka, Marta and Drechsler, Christine and Perschin, Veronika and Blum, Robert and Aufmkolk, Sarah and Granado, Noelia and Moratalla, Rosario and Sauer, Markus and Monoranu, Camelia and Volkmann, Jens and Ip, Chi Wang and Stigloher, Christian and Sendtner, Michael},
  title     = {DRD1 signaling modulates TrkB turnover and BDNF sensitivity in direct pathway striatal medium spiny neurons},
  series = {Cell Reports},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Cell Reports},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112575},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-349932},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Highlights • Dopamine receptor-1 activation induces TrkB cell-surface expression in striatal neurons • Dopaminergic deficits cause TrkB accumulation and clustering in the ER • TrkB clusters colocalize with cargo receptor SORCS-2 in direct pathway striatal neurons • Intracellular TrkB clusters fail to fuse with lysosomes after dopamine depletion Summary Disturbed motor control is a hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD). Cortico-striatal synapses play a central role in motor learning and adaption, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) from cortico-striatal afferents modulates their plasticity via TrkB in striatal medium spiny projection neurons (SPNs). We studied the role of dopamine in modulating the sensitivity of direct pathway SPNs (dSPNs) to BDNF in cultures of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-enriched D1-expressing SPNs and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-treated rats. DRD1 activation causes enhanced TrkB translocation to the cell surface and increased sensitivity for BDNF. In contrast, dopamine depletion in cultured dSPN neurons, 6-OHDA-treated rats, and postmortem brain of patients with PD reduces BDNF responsiveness and causes formation of intracellular TrkB clusters. These clusters associate with sortilin related VPS10 domain containing receptor 2 (SORCS-2) in multivesicular-like structures, which apparently protects them from lysosomal degradation. Thus, impaired TrkB processing might contribute to disturbed motor function in PD.},
  language  = {en}
}