@article{ScheiblerSchneider1985,
  author    = {Scheibler, Dieter and Schneider, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Monte Carlo Tests of the accuracy of Cluster analysis algorithms: A comparison of hierarchical and nonhierarchical methods},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62000},
  year      = {1985},
  abstract  = {Nine hierarchical and four nonhierarchical clustering algorithms were compared on their ability to resolve 200 multivariate normal mixtures. The effects of coverage, similarity measures, and cluster overlap were studied by including different levels of coverage for the hierarchical algorithms, Euclidean distances and Pearson correlation coefficients, and truncated multivariate normal mixtures in the analysis. The results confirmed the findings of previous Monte Carlo studies on clustering procedures in that accuracy was inversely related to coverage, and that algorithms using correlation as the similarity measure were significantly more accurate than those using Euclidean distances. No evidence was found for the assumption that the positive effects of the use of correlation coefficients are confined to unconstrained mixture models.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchofferSchueleinArandetal.2016,
  author    = {Schoffer, Olaf and Sch{\"u}lein, Stefanie and Arand, Gerlinde and Arnholdt, Hans and Baaske, Dieter and Bargou, Ralf C. and Becker, Nikolaus and Beckmann, Matthias W. and Bodack, Yves and B{\"o}hme, Beatrix and Bozkurt, Tayfun and Breitsprecher, Regine and Buchali, Andre and Burger, Elke and Burger, Ulrike and Dommisch, Klaus and Elsner, Gudrun and Fernschild, Karin and Flintzer, Ulrike and Funke, Uwe and Gerken, Michael and G{\"o}bel, Hubert and Grobe, Norbert and Gumpp, Vera and Heinzerling, Lucie and Kempfer, Lana Raffaela and Kiani, Alexander and Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika and Kl{\"o}cking, Sabine and Kreibich, Ute and Knabner, Katrin and Kuhn, Peter and Lutze, Stine and M{\"a}der, Uwe and Maisel, Tanja and Maschke, Jan and Middeke, Martin and Neubauer, Andreas and Niedostatek, Antje and Opazo-Saez, Anabelle and Peters, Christoph and Schell, Beatrice and Schenkirsch, Gerhard and Schmalenberg, Harald and Schmidt, Peter and Schneider, Constanze and Schubotz, Birgit and Seide, Anika and Strecker, Paul and Taubenheim, Sabine and Wackes, Matthias and Weiß, Steffen and Welke, Claudia and Werner, Carmen and Wittekind, Christian and Wulff, J{\"o}rg and Zettl, Heike and Klug, Stefanie J.},
  title     = {Tumour stage distribution and survival of malignant melanoma in Germany 2002-2011},
  series = {BMC Cancer},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {BMC Cancer},
  number    = {936},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12885-016-2963-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164544},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background Over the past two decades, there has been a rising trend in malignant melanoma incidence worldwide. In 2008, Germany introduced a nationwide skin cancer screening program starting at age 35. The aims of this study were to analyse the distribution of malignant melanoma tumour stages over time, as well as demographic and regional differences in stage distribution and survival of melanoma patients. Methods Pooled data from 61 895 malignant melanoma patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2011 and documented in 28 German population-based and hospital-based clinical cancer registries were analysed using descriptive methods, joinpoint regression, logistic regression and relative survival. Results The number of annually documented cases increased by 53.2\% between 2002 (N = 4 779) and 2011 (N = 7 320). There was a statistically significant continuous positive trend in the proportion of stage UICC I cases diagnosed between 2002 and 2011, compared to a negative trend for stage UICC II. No trends were found for stages UICC III and IV respectively. Age (OR 0.97, 95\% CI 0.97-0.97), sex (OR 1.18, 95\% CI 1.11-1.25), date of diagnosis (OR 1.05, 95\% CI 1.04-1.06), 'diagnosis during screening' (OR 3.24, 95\% CI 2.50-4.19) and place of residence (OR 1.23, 95\% CI 1.16-1.30) had a statistically significant influence on the tumour stage at diagnosis. The overall 5-year relative survival for invasive cases was 83.4\% (95\% CI 82.8-83.9\%). Conclusions No distinct changes in the distribution of malignant melanoma tumour stages among those aged 35 and older were seen that could be directly attributed to the introduction of skin cancer screening in 2008. "},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KoepingShehataDielerSchneideretal.2018,
  author    = {K{\"o}ping, Maria and Shehata-Dieler, Wafaa and Schneider, Dieter and Cebulla, Mario and Oder, Daniel and M{\"u}ntze, Jonas and Nordbeck, Peter and Wanner, Christoph and Hagen, Rudolf and Schraven, Sebastian P.},
  title     = {Characterization of vertigo and hearing loss in patients with Fabry disease},
  series = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13023-018-0882-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-222818},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background Fabry Disease (FD) is an X-linked hereditary lysosomal storage disorder which leads to a multisystemic intralysosomal accumulation of globotriaosylceramid (Gb3). Besides prominent renal and cardiac organ involvement, patients commonly complain about vestibulocochlear symptoms like high-frequency hearing loss, tinnitus and vertigo. However, comprehensive data especially on vertigo remain scarce. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and characteristics of vertigo and hearing loss in patients with FD, depending on renal and cardiac parameters and get hints about the site and the pattern of the lesions. Methods Single-center study with 57 FD patients. Every patient underwent an oto-rhino-laryngological examination as well as videonystagmography and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) and audiological measurements using pure tone audiometry and auditory brainstem response audiometry (ABR). Renal function was measured by eGFR, cardiac impairment was graduated by NYHA class. Results More than one out of three patients (35.1\%) complained about hearing loss, 54.4\% about vertigo and 28.1\% about both symptom. In 74\% a sensorineural hearing loss of at least 25 dB was found, ABR could exclude any retrocochlear lesion. Caloric testing showed abnormal values in 71.9\%, VEMPs were pathological in 68\%. A correlation between the side or the shape of hearing loss and pathological vestibular testing could not be revealed. Conclusions Hearing loss and vertigo show a high prevalence in FD. While hearing loss seems due to a cochlear lesion, peripheral vestibular as well as central nervous pathologies cause vertigo. Thus, both the site of lesion and the pathophysiological patterns seem to differ.},
  language  = {en}
}