@article{BoehmScherzerKroletal.2016, author = {B{\"o}hm, Jennifer and Scherzer, S{\"o}nke and Krol, Elzbieta and Kreuzer, Ines and von Meyer, Katharina and Lorey, Christian and Mueller, Thomas D. and Shabala, Lana and Monte, Isabel and Salano, Roberto and Al-Rasheid, Khaled A. S. and Rennenberg, Heinz and Shabala, Sergey and Neher, Erwin and Hedrich, Rainer}, title = {The Venus Flytrap Dionaea muscipula Counts Prey-Induced Action Potentials to Induce Sodium Uptake}, series = {Current Biology}, volume = {26}, journal = {Current Biology}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.057}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-128054}, pages = {286-295}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Carnivorous plants, such as the Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula), depend on an animal diet when grown in nutrient-poor soils. When an insect visits the trap and tilts the mechanosensors on the inner surface, action potentials (APs) are fired. After a moving object elicits two APs, the trap snaps shut, encaging the victim. Panicking preys repeatedly touch the trigger hairs over the subsequent hours, leading to a hermetically closed trap, which via the gland-based endocrine system is flooded by a prey-decomposing acidic enzyme cocktail. Here, we asked the question as to how many times trigger hairs have to be stimulated (e.g., now many APs are required) for the flytrap to recognize an encaged object as potential food, thus making it worthwhile activating the glands. By applying a series of trigger-hair stimulations, we found that the touch hormone jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathway is activated after the second stimulus, while more than three APs are required to trigger an expression of genes encoding prey-degrading hydrolases, and that this expression is proportional to the number of mechanical stimulations. A decomposing animal contains a sodium load, and we have found that these sodium ions enter the capture organ via glands. We identified a flytrap sodium channel DmHKT1 as responsible for this sodium acquisition, with the number of transcripts expressed being dependent on the number of mechano-electric stimulations. Hence, the number of APs a victim triggers while trying to break out of the trap identifies the moving prey as a struggling Na+-rich animal and nutrition for the plant.}, subject = {Venusfliegenfalle}, language = {en} } @article{BoehmScherzerKroletal.2016, author = {B{\"o}hm, Jennifer and Scherzer, S{\"o}nke and Krol, Elzbieta and Kreuzer, Ines and von Meyer, Katharina and Lorey, Christian and Mueller, Thomas D. and Shabala, Lana and Monte, Isabel and Solano, Roberto and Al-Rasheid, Khaled A. S. and Rennenberg, Heinz and Shabala, Sergey and Neher, Erwin and Hedrich, Rainer}, title = {The Venus flytrap Dionaea muscipula counts prey-induced action potentials to induce sodium uptake}, series = {Current Biology}, volume = {26}, journal = {Current Biology}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.057}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-190870}, pages = {286-295}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Carnivorous plants, such as the Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula), depend on an animal diet when grown in nutrient-poor soils. When an insect visits the trap and tilts the mechanosensors on the inner surface, action potentials (APs) are fired. After a moving object elicits two APs, the trap snaps shut, encaging the victim. Panicking preys repeatedly touch the trigger hairs over the subsequent hours, leading to a hermetically closed trap, which via the gland-based endocrine system is flooded by a prey-decomposing acidic enzyme cocktail. Here, we asked the question as to how many times trigger hairs have to be stimulated (e.g., now many APs are required) for the flytrap to recognize an encaged object as potential food, thus making it worthwhile activating the glands. By applying a series of trigger-hair stimulations, we found that the touch hormone jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathway is activated after the second stimulus, while more than three APs are required to trigger an expression of genes encoding prey-degrading hydrolases, and that this expression is proportional to the number of mechanical stimulations. A decomposing animal contains a sodium load, and we have found that these sodium ions enter the capture organ via glands. We identified a flytrap sodium channel DmHKT1 as responsible for this sodium acquisition, with the number of transcripts expressed being dependent on the number of mechano-electric stimulations. Hence, the number of APs a victim triggers while trying to break out of the trap identifies the moving prey as a struggling Na\(^+\)-rich animal and nutrition for the plant.}, language = {en} } @article{BemmBeckerLarischetal.2016, author = {Bemm, Felix and Becker, Dirk and Larisch, Christina and Kreuzer, Ines and Escalante-Perez, Maria and Schulze, Waltraud X. and Ankenbrand, Markus and Van de Weyer, Anna-Lena and Krol, Elzbieta and Al-Rasheid, Khaled A. and Mith{\"o}fer, Axel and Weber, Andreas P. and Schultz, J{\"o}rg and Hedrich, Rainer}, title = {Venus flytrap carnivorous lifestyle builds on herbivore defense strategies}, series = {Genome Research}, volume = {26}, journal = {Genome Research}, number = {6}, doi = {10.1101/gr.202200.115}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-188799}, pages = {812-825}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Although the concept of botanical carnivory has been known since Darwin's time, the molecular mechanisms that allow animal feeding remain unknown, primarily due to a complete lack of genomic information. Here, we show that the transcriptomic landscape of the Dionaea trap is dramatically shifted toward signal transduction and nutrient transport upon insect feeding, with touch hormone signaling and protein secretion prevailing. At the same time, a massive induction of general defense responses is accompanied by the repression of cell death-related genes/processes. We hypothesize that the carnivory syndrome of Dionaea evolved by exaptation of ancient defense pathways, replacing cell death with nutrient acquisition.}, language = {en} } @article{PaponovDindas Krol etal.2019, author = {Paponov, Ivan A. and Dindas , Julian and Kr{\´o}l , Elżbieta and Friz, Tatyana and Budnyk, Vadym and Teale, William and Paponov, Martina and Hedrich , Rainer and Palme, Klaus}, title = {Auxin-Induced plasma membrane depolarization is regulated by Auxin transport and not by AUXIN BINDING PROTEIN1}, series = {Frontiers in Plant Science}, volume = {9}, journal = {Frontiers in Plant Science}, issn = {1664-462X}, doi = {10.3389/fpls.2018.01953}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-195914}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Auxin is a molecule, which controls many aspects of plant development through both transcriptional and non-transcriptional signaling responses. AUXIN BINDING PROTEIN1 (ABP1) is a putative receptor for rapid non-transcriptional auxin-induced changes in plasma membrane depolarization and endocytosis rates. However, the mechanism of ABP1-mediated signaling is poorly understood. Here we show that membrane depolarization and endocytosis inhibition are ABP1-independent responses and that auxin-induced plasma membrane depolarization is instead dependent on the auxin influx carrier AUX1. AUX1 was itself not involved in the regulation of endocytosis. Auxin-dependent depolarization of the plasma membrane was also modulated by the auxin efflux carrier PIN2. These data establish a new connection between auxin transport and non-transcriptional auxin signaling.}, language = {en} } @article{WanZhangPruittetal.2019, author = {Wan, Wei-Lin and Zhang, Lisha and Pruitt, Rory and Zaidem, Maricris and Brugman, Rik and Ma, Xiyu and Krol, Elzbieta and Perraki, Artemis and Kilian, Joachim and Grossmann, Guido and Stahl, Mark and Shan, Libo and Zipfel, Cyril and van Kan, Jan A. L. and Hedrich, Rainer and Weigel, Detlef and Gust, Andrea A. and N{\"u}rnberger, Thorsten}, title = {Comparing Arabidopsis receptor kinase and receptor protein-mediated immune signaling reveals BIK1-dependent differences}, series = {New Phytologist}, volume = {221}, journal = {New Phytologist}, doi = {10.1111/nph.15497}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233385}, pages = {2080-2095}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) sense microbial patterns and activate innate immunity against attempted microbial invasions. The leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases (LRR-RK) FLS2 and EFR, and the LRR receptor protein (LRR-RP) receptors RLP23 and RLP42, respectively, represent prototypical members of these two prominent and closely related PRR families. We conducted a survey of Arabidopsis thaliana immune signaling mediated by these receptors to address the question of commonalities and differences between LRR-RK and LRR-RP signaling. Quantitative differences in timing and amplitude were observed for several early immune responses, with RP-mediated responses typically being slower and more prolonged than those mediated by RKs. Activation of RLP23, but not FLS2, induced the production of camalexin. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that RLP23-regulated genes represent only a fraction of those genes differentially expressed upon FLS2 activation. Several positive and negative regulators of FLS2-signaling play similar roles in RLP23 signaling. Intriguingly, the cytoplasmic receptor kinase BIK1, a positive regulator of RK signaling, acts as a negative regulator of RP-type immune receptors in a manner dependent on BIK1 kinase activity. Our study unveiled unexpected differences in two closely related receptor systems and reports a new negative role of BIK1 in plant immunity.}, language = {en} }