@article{MengerLeeNotzetal.2022,
  author    = {Menger, Johannes and Lee, Zheng-Yii and Notz, Quirin and Wallqvist, Julia and Hasan, M. Shahnaz and Elke, Gunnar and Dworschak, Martin and Meybohm, Patrick and Heyland, Daren K. and Stoppe, Christian},
  title     = {Administration of vitamin D and its metabolites in critically ill adult patients: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials},
  series = {Critical Care},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Critical Care},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13054-022-04139-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-299700},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background The clinical significance of vitamin D administration in critically ill patients remains inconclusive. The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of vitamin D and its metabolites on major clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, including a subgroup analysis based on vitamin D status and route of vitamin D administration. Methods Major databases were searched through February 9, 2022. Randomized controlled trials of adult critically ill patients with an intervention group receiving vitamin D or its metabolites were included. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled risk ratio (dichotomized outcomes) or mean difference (continuous outcomes). Risk of bias assessment included the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Results Sixteen randomized clinical trials with 2449 patients were included. Vitamin D administration was associated with lower overall mortality (16 studies: risk ratio 0.78, 95\% confidence interval 0.62-0.97, p = 0.03; I2 = 30\%), reduced intensive care unit length of stay (12 studies: mean difference - 3.13 days, 95\% CI - 5.36 to - 0.89, n = 1250, p = 0.006; I2 = 70\%), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (9 studies: mean difference - 5.07 days, 95\% CI - 7.42 to - 2.73, n = 572, p < 0.0001; I2 = 54\%). Parenteral administration was associated with a greater effect on overall mortality than enteral administration (test of subgroup differences, p = 0.04), whereas studies of parenteral subgroups had lower quality. There were no subgroup differences based on baseline vitamin D levels. Conclusions Vitamin D supplementation in critically ill patients may reduce mortality. Parenteral administration might be associated with a greater impact on mortality. Heterogeneity and assessed certainty among the studies limits the generalizability of the results.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StoppePatelZarbocketal.2023,
  author    = {Stoppe, Christian and Patel, Jayshil J. and Zarbock, Alex and Lee, Zheng-Yii and Rice, Todd W. and Mafrici, Bruno and Wehner, Rebecca and Chan, Man Hung Manuel and Lai, Peter Chi Keung and MacEachern, Kristen and Myrianthefs, Pavlos and Tsigou, Evdoxia and Ortiz-Reyes, Luis and Jiang, Xuran and Day, Andrew G. and Hasan, M. Shahnaz and Meybohm, Patrick and Ke, Lu and Heyland, Daren K.},
  title     = {The impact of higher protein dosing on outcomes in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a post hoc analysis of the EFFORT protein trial},
  series = {Critical Care},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {Critical Care},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13054-023-04663-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357221},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Background Based on low-quality evidence, current nutrition guidelines recommend the delivery of high-dose protein in critically ill patients. The EFFORT Protein trial showed that higher protein dose is not associated with improved outcomes, whereas the effects in critically ill patients who developed acute kidney injury (AKI) need further evaluation. The overall aim is to evaluate the effects of high-dose protein in critically ill patients who developed different stages of AKI. Methods In this post hoc analysis of the EFFORT Protein trial, we investigated the effect of high versus usual protein dose (≥ 2.2 vs. ≤ 1.2 g/kg body weight/day) on time-to-discharge alive from the hospital (TTDA) and 60-day mortality and in different subgroups in critically ill patients with AKI as defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria within 7 days of ICU admission. The associations of protein dose with incidence and duration of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) were also investigated. Results Of the 1329 randomized patients, 312 developed AKI and were included in this analysis (163 in the high and 149 in the usual protein dose group). High protein was associated with a slower time-to-discharge alive from the hospital (TTDA) (hazard ratio 0.5, 95\% CI 0.4-0.8) and higher 60-day mortality (relative risk 1.4 (95\% CI 1.1-1.8). Effect modification was not statistically significant for any subgroup, and no subgroups suggested a beneficial effect of higher protein, although the harmful effect of higher protein target appeared to disappear in patients who received kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Protein dose was not significantly associated with the incidence of AKI and KRT or duration of KRT. Conclusions In critically ill patients with AKI, high protein may be associated with worse outcomes in all AKI stages. Recommendation of higher protein dosing in AKI patients should be carefully re-evaluated to avoid potential harmful effects especially in patients who were not treated with KRT. Trial registration: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03160547) on May 17th 2017.},
  language  = {en}
}