@article{EdgecockCarettaDavenneetal.2013, author = {Edgecock, T. R. and Caretta, O. and Davenne, T. and Densam, C. and Fitton, M. and Kelliher, D. and Loveridge, P. and Machida, S. and Prior, C. and Rogers, C. and Rooney, M. and Thomason, J. and Wilcox, D. and Wildner, E. and Efthymiopoulos, I. and Garoby, R. and Gilardoni, S. and Hansen, C. and Benedetto, E. and Jensen, E. and Kosmicki, A. and Martini, M. and Osborne, J. and Prior, G. and Stora, T. and Melo Mendonca, T. and Vlachoudis, V. and Waaijer, C. and Cupial, P. and Chanc{\´e}, A. and Longhin, A. and Payet, J. and Zito, M. and Baussan, E. and Bobeth, C. and Bouquerel, E. and Dracos, M. and Gaudiot, G. and Lepers, B. and Osswald, F. and Poussot, P. and Vassilopoulos, N. and Wurtz, J. and Zeter, V. and Bielski, J. and Kozien, M. and Lacny, L. and Skoczen, B. and Szybinski, B. and Ustrycka, A. and Wroblewski, A. and Marie-Jeanne, M. and Balint, P. and Fourel, C. and Giraud, J. and Jacob, J. and Lamy, T. and Latrasse, L. and Sortais, P. and Thuillier, T. and Mitrofanov, S. and Loiselet, M. and Keutgen, Th. and Delbar, Th. and Debray, F. and Trophine, C. and Veys, S. and Daversin, C. and Zorin, V. and Izotov, I. and Skalyga, V. and Burt, G. and Dexter, A. C. and Kravchuk, V. L. and Marchi, T. and Cinausero, M. and Gramegna, F. and De Angelis, G. and Prete, G. and Collazuol, G. and Laveder, M. and Mazzocco, M. and Mezzetto, M. and Signorini, C. and Vardaci, E. and Di Nitto, A. and Brondi, A. and La Rana, G. and Migliozzi, P. and Moro, R. and Palladino, V. and Gelli, N. and Berkovits, D. and Hass, M. and Hirsh, T. Y. and Schuhmann, M. and Stahl, A. and Wehner, J. and Bross, A. and Kopp, J. and Neuffer, D. and Wands, R. and Bayes, R. and Laing, A. and Soler, P. and Agarwalla, S. K. and Cervera Villanueva, A. and Donini, A. and Ghosh, T. and G{\´o}mez Cadenas, J. J. and Hern{\´a}ndez, P. and Mart{\´i}n-Albo, J. and Mena, O. and Burguet-Castell, J. and Agostino, L. and Buizza-Avanzini, M. and Marafini, M. and Patzak, T. and Tonazzo, A. and Duchesneau, D. and Mosca, L. and Bogomilov, M. and Karadzhov, Y. and Matev, R. and Tsenov, R. and Akhmedov, E. and Blennow, M. and Lindner, M. and Schwetz, T. and Fern{\´a}ndez Martinez, E. and Maltoni, M. and Men{\´e}ndez, J. and Giunti, C. and Gonz{\´a}lez Garc{\´i}a, M. C. and Salvado, J. and Coloma, P. and Huber, P. and Li, T. and L{\´o}pez Pav{\´o}n, J. and Orme, C. and Pascoli, S. and Meloni, D. and Tang, J. and Winter, W. and Ohlsson, T. and Zhang, H. and Scotto-Lavina, L. and Terranova, F. and Bonesini, M. and Tortora, L. and Alekou, A. and Aslaninejad, M. and Bontoiu, C. and Kurup, A. and Jenner, L. J. and Long, K. and Pasternak, J. and Pozimski, J. and Back, J. J. and Harrison, P. and Beard, K. and Bogacz, A. and Berg, J. S. and Stratakis, D. and Witte, H. and Snopok, P. and Bliss, N. and Cordwell, M. and Moss, A. and Pattalwar, S. and Apollonio, M.}, title = {High intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe}, series = {Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams}, volume = {16}, journal = {Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.021002}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126611}, pages = {21002}, year = {2013}, abstract = {The EUROnu project has studied three possible options for future, high intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe. The first is a Super Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of pions created by bombarding targets with a 4 MW proton beam from the CERN High Power Superconducting Proton Linac. The far detector for this facility is the 500 kt MEMPHYS water Cherenkov, located in the Frejus tunnel. The second facility is the Neutrino Factory, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of mu(+) and mu(-) beams in a storage ring. The far detector in this case is a 100 kt magnetized iron neutrino detector at a baseline of 2000 km. The third option is a Beta Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of beta emitting isotopes, in particular He-6 and Ne-18, also stored in a ring. The far detector is also the MEMPHYS detector in the Frejus tunnel. EUROnu has undertaken conceptual designs of these facilities and studied the performance of the detectors. Based on this, it has determined the physics reach of each facility, in particular for the measurement of CP violation in the lepton sector, and estimated the cost of construction. These have demonstrated that the best facility to build is the Neutrino Factory. However, if a powerful proton driver is constructed for another purpose or if the MEMPHYS detector is built for astroparticle physics, the Super Beam also becomes very attractive.}, language = {en} } @article{GalluzziBravoSanPedroVitaleetal.2015, author = {Galluzzi, L. and Bravo-San Pedro, J. M. and Vitale, I. and Aaronson, S. A. and Abrams, J. M. and Adam, D. and Alnemri, E. S. and Altucci, L. and Andrews, D. and Annicchiarico-Petruzelli, M. and Baehrecke, E. H. and Bazan, N. G. and Bertrand, M. J. and Bianchi, K. and Blagosklonny, M. V. and Blomgren, K. and Borner, C. and Bredesen, D. E. and Brenner, C. and Campanella, M. and Candi, E. and Cecconi, F. and Chan, F. K. and Chandel, N. S. and Cheng, E. H. and Chipuk, J. E. and Cidlowski, J. A. and Ciechanover, A. and Dawson, T. M. and Dawson, V. L. and De Laurenzi, V. and De Maria, R. and Debatin, K. M. and Di Daniele, N. and Dixit, V. M. and Dynlacht, B. D. and El-Deiry, W. S. and Fimia, G. M. and Flavell, R. A. and Fulda, S. and Garrido, C. and Gougeon, M. L. and Green, D. R. and Gronemeyer, H. and Hajnoczky, G. and Hardwick, J. M. and Hengartner, M. O. and Ichijo, H. and Joseph, B. and Jost, P. J. and Kaufmann, T. and Kepp, O. and Klionsky, D. J. and Knight, R. A. and Kumar, S. and Lemasters, J. J. and Levine, B. and Linkermann, A. and Lipton, S. A. and Lockshin, R. A. and L{\´o}pez-Ot{\´i}n, C. and Lugli, E. and Madeo, F. and Malorni, W. and Marine, J. C. and Martin, S. J. and Martinou, J. C. and Medema, J. P. and Meier, P. and Melino, S. and Mizushima, N. and Moll, U. and Mu{\~n}oz-Pinedo, C. and Nu{\~n}ez, G. and Oberst, A. and Panaretakis, T. and Penninger, J. M. and Peter, M. E. and Piacentini, M. and Pinton, P. and Prehn, J. H. and Puthalakath, H. and Rabinovich, G. A. and Ravichandran, K. S. and Rizzuto, R. and Rodrigues, C. M. and Rubinsztein, D. C. and Rudel, T. and Shi, Y. and Simon, H. U. and Stockwell, B. R. and Szabadkai, G. and Tait, S. W. and Tang, H. L. and Tavernarakis, N. and Tsujimoto, Y. and Vanden Berghe, T. and Vandenabeele, P. and Villunger, A. and Wagner, E. F. and Walczak, H. and White, E. and Wood, W. G. and Yuan, J. and Zakeri, Z. and Zhivotovsky, B. and Melino, G. and Kroemer, G.}, title = {Essential versus accessory aspects of cell death: recommendations of the NCCD 2015}, series = {Cell Death and Differentiation}, volume = {22}, journal = {Cell Death and Differentiation}, doi = {10.1038/cdd.2014.137}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121207}, pages = {58-73}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Cells exposed to extreme physicochemical or mechanical stimuli die in an uncontrollable manner, as a result of their immediate structural breakdown. Such an unavoidable variant of cellular demise is generally referred to as 'accidental cell death' (ACD). In most settings, however, cell death is initiated by a genetically encoded apparatus, correlating with the fact that its course can be altered by pharmacologic or genetic interventions. 'Regulated cell death' (RCD) can occur as part of physiologic programs or can be activated once adaptive responses to perturbations of the extracellular or intracellular microenvironment fail. The biochemical phenomena that accompany RCD may be harnessed to classify it into a few subtypes, which often (but not always) exhibit stereotyped morphologic features. Nonetheless, efficiently inhibiting the processes that are commonly thought to cause RCD, such as the activation of executioner caspases in the course of apoptosis, does not exert true cytoprotective effects in the mammalian system, but simply alters the kinetics of cellular demise as it shifts its morphologic and biochemical correlates. Conversely, bona fide cytoprotection can be achieved by inhibiting the transduction of lethal signals in the early phases of the process, when adaptive responses are still operational. Thus, the mechanisms that truly execute RCD may be less understood, less inhibitable and perhaps more homogeneous than previously thought. Here, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.}, language = {en} }