@article{KannBlessmannWinkelmannetal.2021,
  author    = {Kann, Simone and Blessmann, Joerg and Winkelmann, Yvonne and Hansen, Jessica and Maya Amaya, Leonardo J. and Rivera Salcedo, Gadith E. and Halas, Hussein El and Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas and Keoviengkhone, Latdamone and Sopraseuth, Vatsana and Deschermeier, Christina and Mika, Angela},
  title     = {Dengue virus detection in Lao PDR and Colombia: Comparative evaluation of PCR tests},
  series = {Tropical Medicine \& International Health},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Tropical Medicine \& International Health},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1111/tmi.13670},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-262703},
  pages     = {1296 -- 1302},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objectives Dengue virus (DENV) detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) facilitates diagnosis of dengue fever, which is the most frequent arboviral disease globally. Two studies were performed in countries with high dengue incidence, to assess the diagnostic performance of different PCR techniques. Methods/Results Two hundred and seventy-nine acute phase blood samples from febrile patients were analyzed for DENV by the RealStar Dengue RT-PCR kit (Altona Diagnostics) as gold standard in comparison with the Tropical Fever Core multiplex PCR (Fast Track Diagnostics). In total, 102 samples collected in Savannakhet Province (Lao PDR, Southeast Asia) in 2013 and 35 samples from Valledupar (Colombia, South America) tested positive for DENV by RealStar RT-PCR. In comparison, the Tropical Fever Core multiplex PCR detected 65.0\% (65/102) and 68.6\% (24/35) of these samples as positive for DENV in Savannakhet and Valledupar, respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity of the multiplex PCR strongly correlated with viral load. A subset of DENV PCR-confirmed samples was additionally tested by BNITM in house Dengue Type RT-PCR in comparison with two commercial test kits (RealStar Dengue Type RT-PCR [Altona Diagnostics], Dengue differentiation PCR [Fast Track Diagnostics]). The leading dengue serotype in Savannakhet was DENV-3 (58\% [29/50]), while DENV-1 (53.8\% [14/26]) was the predominant serotype found in samples collected in Valledupar by BNITM-type PCR. However, three DENV serotypes were circulating in Valledupar and in Savannakhet. In 2015, additional studies found predominantly DENV-4 (71\% [12/17]) in Savannakhet. Conclusions Both studies emphasized that routine diagnostics in both regions will benefit from an expanded use of highly sensitive pan-dengue PCRs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FarmerStrzelczykFinisguerraetal.2021,
  author    = {Farmer, Adam D. and Strzelczyk, Adam and Finisguerra, Alessandra and Gourine, Alexander V. and Gharabaghi, Alireza and Hasan, Alkomiet and Burger, Andreas M. and Jaramillo, Andr{\´e}s M. and Mertens, Ann and Majid, Arshad and Verkuil, Bart and Badran, Bashar W. and Ventura-Bort, Carlos and Gaul, Charly and Beste, Christian and Warren, Christopher M. and Quintana, Daniel S. and H{\"a}mmerer, Dorothea and Freri, Elena and Frangos, Eleni and Tobaldini, Eleonora and Kaniusas, Eugenijus and Rosenow, Felix and Capone, Fioravante and Panetsos, Fivos and Ackland, Gareth L. and Kaithwas, Gaurav and O'Leary, Georgia H. and Genheimer, Hannah and Jacobs, Heidi I. L. and Van Diest, Ilse and Schoenen, Jean and Redgrave, Jessica and Fang, Jiliang and Deuchars, Jim and Sz{\´e}les, Jozsef C. and Thayer, Julian F. and More, Kaushik and Vonck, Kristl and Steenbergen, Laura and Vianna, Lauro C. and McTeague, Lisa M. and Ludwig, Mareike and Veldhuizen, Maria G. and De Couck, Marijke and Casazza, Marina and Keute, Marius and Bikson, Marom and Andreatta, Marta and D'Agostini, Martina and Weymar, Mathias and Betts, Matthew and Prigge, Matthias and Kaess, Michael and Roden, Michael and Thai, Michelle and Schuster, Nathaniel M. and Montano, Nicola and Hansen, Niels and Kroemer, Nils B. and Rong, Peijing and Fischer, Rico and Howland, Robert H. and Sclocco, Roberta and Sellaro, Roberta and Garcia, Ronald G. and Bauer, Sebastian and Gancheva, Sofiya and Stavrakis, Stavros and Kampusch, Stefan and Deuchars, Susan A. and Wehner, Sven and Laborde, Sylvain and Usichenko, Taras and Polak, Thomas and Zaehle, Tino and Borges, Uirassu and Teckentrup, Vanessa and Jandackova, Vera K. and Napadow, Vitaly and Koenig, Julian},
  title     = {International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020)},
  series = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  issn      = {1662-5161},
  doi       = {10.3389/fnhum.2020.568051},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234346},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Given its non-invasive nature, there is increasing interest in the use of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) across basic, translational and clinical research. Contemporaneously, tVNS can be achieved by stimulating either the auricular branch or the cervical bundle of the vagus nerve, referred to as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation(VNS) and transcutaneous cervical VNS, respectively. In order to advance the field in a systematic manner, studies using these technologies need to adequately report sufficient methodological detail to enable comparison of results between studies, replication of studies, as well as enhancing study participant safety. We systematically reviewed the existing tVNS literature to evaluate current reporting practices. Based on this review, and consensus among participating authors, we propose a set of minimal reporting items to guide future tVNS studies. The suggested items address specific technical aspects of the device and stimulation parameters. We also cover general recommendations including inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants, outcome parameters and the detailed reporting of side effects. Furthermore, we review strategies used to identify the optimal stimulation parameters for a given research setting and summarize ongoing developments in animal research with potential implications for the application of tVNS in humans. Finally, we discuss the potential of tVNS in future research as well as the associated challenges across several disciplines in research and clinical practice.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KannKunzHansenetal.2020,
  author    = {Kann, Simone and Kunz, Meik and Hansen, Jessica and Sievertsen, J{\"u}rgen and Crespo, Jose J. and Loperena, Aristides and Arriens, Sandra and Dandekar, Thomas},
  title     = {Chagas disease: detection of Trypanosoma cruzi by a new, high-specific real time PCR},
  series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  number    = {5},
  issn      = {2077-0383},
  doi       = {10.3390/jcm9051517},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-205746},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background: Chagas disease (CD) is a major burden in Latin America, expanding also to non-endemic countries. A gold standard to detect the CD causing pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi is currently not available. Existing real time polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCRs) lack sensitivity and/or specificity. We present a new, highly specific RT-PCR for the diagnosis and monitoring of CD. Material and Methods: We analyzed 352 serum samples from Indigenous people living in high endemic CD areas of Colombia using three leading RT-PCRs (k-DNA-, TCZ-, 18S rRNA-PCR), the newly developed one (NDO-PCR), a Rapid Test/enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA), and immunofluorescence. Eighty-seven PCR-products were verified by sequence analysis after plasmid vector preparation. Results: The NDO-PCR showed the highest sensitivity (92.3\%), specificity (100\%), and accuracy (94.3\%) for T. cruzi detection in the 87 sequenced samples. Sensitivities and specificities of the kDNA-PCR were 89.2\%/22.7\%, 20.5\%/100\% for TCZ-PCR, and 1.5\%/100\% for the 18S rRNA-PCR. The kDNA-PCR revealed a 77.3\% false positive rate, mostly due to cross-reactions with T. rangeli (NDO-PCR 0\%). TCZ- and 18S rRNA-PCR showed a false negative rate of 79.5\% and 98.5\% (NDO-PCR 7.7\%), respectively. Conclusions: The NDO-PCR demonstrated the highest specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy compared to leading PCRs. Together with serologic tests, it can be considered as a reliable tool for CD detection and can improve CD management significantly.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KannBruennertHansenetal.2020,
  author    = {Kann, Simone and Bruennert, Daniela and Hansen, Jessica and Concha Mendoza, Gustavo Andr{\´e}s and Crespo Gonzalez, Jos{\´e} Jos{\´e} and Armenta Quintero, Cielo Leonor and Hanke, Miriam and Hagen, Ralf Matthias and Backhaus, Joy and Frickmann, Hagen},
  title     = {High prevalence of intestinal pathogens in Indigenous in Colombia},
  series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {2077-0383},
  doi       = {10.3390/jcm9092786},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-211289},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background: Intestinal infections remain a major public health burden in developing countries. Due to social, ecological, environmental, and cultural conditions, Indigenous peoples in Colombia are at particularly high risk. Materials: 137 stool samples were analyzed by microscopy and real-time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), targeting protozoan parasites (Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica, Cryptosporidium spp., and Cyclospora cayetanensis), bacteria (Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., Shigella ssp./enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), Yersinia spp., enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxin-producing E. coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), and Tropheryma whipplei), and helminths (Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancylostoma spp., Trichuris. trichiura, Taenia spp., Hymenolepis nana, Enterobius vermicularis, and Schistosoma spp.). Microscopy found additional cases of helminth infections. Results: At least one pathogen was detected in 93\% of the samples. The overall results revealed protozoa in 79\%, helminths in 69\%, and bacteria in 41\%. G. intestinalis (48\%), Necator/hookworm (27\%), and EAEC (68\%) were the most common in each group. Noteworthy, T. whipplei was positive in 7\% and T. trichirua in 23\% of the samples. A significant association of one infection promoting the other was determined for G. intestinalis and C. jejuni, helminth infections, and EIEC. Conclusions: The results illustrate the high burden of gastrointestinal pathogens among Indigenous peoples compared to other developing countries. Countermeasures are urgently required.},
  language  = {en}
}