@article{PetersenKuntzerFischeretal.2015,
  author    = {Petersen, Jens A. and Kuntzer, Thierry and Fischer, Dirk and von der Hagen, Maja and Veronika, Angela and Lobrinus, Johannes A. and Kress, Wolfram and Rushing, Elisabeth J. and Sinnreich, Michael and Jung, Hans H.},
  title     = {Dysferlinopathy in Switzerland: clinical phenotypes and potential founder effects},
  series = {BMC Neurology},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {BMC Neurology},
  number    = {182},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12883-015-0449-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-139920},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: Dysferlin is reduced in patients with limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B, Miyoshi myopathy, distal anterior compartment myopathy, and in certain Ethnic clusters. Methods: We evaluated clinical and genetic patient data from three different Swiss Neuromuscular Centers. Results: Thirteen patients from 6 non-related families were included. Age of onset was 18.8 +/- 4.3 years. In all patients, diallelic disease-causing mutations were identified in the DYSF gene. Nine patients from 3 non-related families from Central Switzerland carried the identical homozygous mutation, c.3031 + 2T>C. A possible founder effect was confirmed by haplotype analysis. Three patients from two different families carried the heterozygous mutation, c.1064_1065delAA. Two novel mutations were identified (c.2869C>T (p.Gln957Stop), c.5928G>A (p.Trp1976Stop)). Conclusions: Our study confirms the phenotypic heterogeneity associated with DYSF mutations. Two mutations (c.3031 + 2T>C, c.1064_1065delAA) appear common in Switzerland. Haplotype analysis performed on one case (c.3031 + 2T>C) suggested a possible founder effect.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BachmannSchrederEngelhardtetal.2021,
  author    = {Bachmann, Friederike and Schreder, Martin and Engelhardt, Monika and Langer, Christian and Wolleschak, Denise and M{\"u}gge, Lars Olof and D{\"u}rk, Heinz and Sch{\"a}fer-Eckart, Kerstin and Blau, Igor Wolfgang and Gramatzki, Martin and Liebisch, Peter and Grube, Matthias and Metzler, Ivana v. and Bassermann, Florian and Metzner, Bernd and R{\"o}llig, Christoph and Hertenstein, Bernd and Khandanpour, Cyrus and Dechow, Tobias and Hebart, Holger and Jung, Wolfram and Theurich, Sebastian and Maschmeyer, Georg and Salwender, Hans and Hess, Georg and Bittrich, Max and Rasche, Leo and Brioli, Annamaria and Eckardt, Kai-Uwe and Straka, Christian and Held, Swantje and Einsele, Hermann and Knop, Stefan},
  title     = {Kinetics of renal function during induction in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of two prospective studies by the German Myeloma Study Group DSMM},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers13061322},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234139},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Preservation of kidney function in newly diagnosed (ND) multiple myeloma (MM) helps to prevent excess toxicity. Patients (pts) from two prospective trials were analyzed, provided postinduction (PInd) restaging was performed. Pts received three cycles with bortezomib (btz), cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (dex; VCD) or btz, lenalidomide (len), and dex (VRd) or len, adriamycin, and dex (RAD). The minimum required estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was >30 mL/min. We analyzed the percent change of the renal function using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)-defined categories. Results: Seven hundred and seventy-two patients were eligible. Three hundred and fifty-six received VCD, 214 VRd, and 202 RAD. VCD patients had the best baseline eGFR. The proportion of pts with eGFR <45 mL/min decreased from 7.3\% at baseline to 1.9\% PInd (p < 0.0001). Thirty-seven point one percent of VCD versus 49\% of VRd patients had a decrease of GFR (p = 0.0872). IMWG-defined "renal complete response (CRrenal)" was achieved in 17/25 (68\%) pts after VCD, 12/19 (63\%) after RAD, and 14/27 (52\%) after VRd (p = 0.4747). Conclusions: Analyzing a large and representative newly diagnosed myeloma (NDMM) group, we found no difference in CRrenal that occurred independently from the myeloma response across the three regimens. A trend towards deterioration of the renal function with VRd versus VCD may be explained by a better pretreatment "renal fitness" in the latter group.},
  language  = {en}
}