@article{JiangOronClarketal.2016,
  author    = {Jiang, Yuxiang and Oron, Tal Ronnen and Clark, Wyatt T. and Bankapur, Asma R. and D'Andrea, Daniel and Lepore, Rosalba and Funk, Christopher S. and Kahanda, Indika and Verspoor, Karin M. and Ben-Hur, Asa and Koo, Da Chen Emily and Penfold-Brown, Duncan and Shasha, Dennis and Youngs, Noah and Bonneau, Richard and Lin, Alexandra and Sahraeian, Sayed M. E. and Martelli, Pier Luigi and Profiti, Giuseppe and Casadio, Rita and Cao, Renzhi and Zhong, Zhaolong and Cheng, Jianlin and Altenhoff, Adrian and Skunca, Nives and Dessimoz, Christophe and Dogan, Tunca and Hakala, Kai and Kaewphan, Suwisa and Mehryary, Farrokh and Salakoski, Tapio and Ginter, Filip and Fang, Hai and Smithers, Ben and Oates, Matt and Gough, Julian and T{\"o}r{\"o}nen, Petri and Koskinen, Patrik and Holm, Liisa and Chen, Ching-Tai and Hsu, Wen-Lian and Bryson, Kevin and Cozzetto, Domenico and Minneci, Federico and Jones, David T. and Chapman, Samuel and BKC, Dukka and Khan, Ishita K. and Kihara, Daisuke and Ofer, Dan and Rappoport, Nadav and Stern, Amos and Cibrian-Uhalte, Elena and Denny, Paul and Foulger, Rebecca E. and Hieta, Reija and Legge, Duncan and Lovering, Ruth C. and Magrane, Michele and Melidoni, Anna N. and Mutowo-Meullenet, Prudence and Pichler, Klemens and Shypitsyna, Aleksandra and Li, Biao and Zakeri, Pooya and ElShal, Sarah and Tranchevent, L{\´e}on-Charles and Das, Sayoni and Dawson, Natalie L. and Lee, David and Lees, Jonathan G. and Sillitoe, Ian and Bhat, Prajwal and Nepusz, Tam{\´a}s and Romero, Alfonso E. and Sasidharan, Rajkumar and Yang, Haixuan and Paccanaro, Alberto and Gillis, Jesse and Sede{\~n}o-Cort{\´e}s, Adriana E. and Pavlidis, Paul and Feng, Shou and Cejuela, Juan M. and Goldberg, Tatyana and Hamp, Tobias and Richter, Lothar and Salamov, Asaf and Gabaldon, Toni and Marcet-Houben, Marina and Supek, Fran and Gong, Qingtian and Ning, Wei and Zhou, Yuanpeng and Tian, Weidong and Falda, Marco and Fontana, Paolo and Lavezzo, Enrico and Toppo, Stefano and Ferrari, Carlo and Giollo, Manuel and Piovesan, Damiano and Tosatto, Silvio C. E. and del Pozo, Angela and Fern{\´a}ndez, Jos{\´e} M. and Maietta, Paolo and Valencia, Alfonso and Tress, Michael L. and Benso, Alfredo and Di Carlo, Stefano and Politano, Gianfranco and Savino, Alessandro and Rehman, Hafeez Ur and Re, Matteo and Mesiti, Marco and Valentini, Giorgio and Bargsten, Joachim W. and van Dijk, Aalt D. J. and Gemovic, Branislava and Glisic, Sanja and Perovic, Vladmir and Veljkovic, Veljko and Almeida-e-Silva, Danillo C. and Vencio, Ricardo Z. N. and Sharan, Malvika and Vogel, J{\"o}rg and Kansakar, Lakesh and Zhang, Shanshan and Vucetic, Slobodan and Wang, Zheng and Sternberg, Michael J. E. and Wass, Mark N. and Huntley, Rachael P. and Martin, Maria J. and O'Donovan, Claire and Robinson, Peter N. and Moreau, Yves and Tramontano, Anna and Babbitt, Patricia C. and Brenner, Steven E. and Linial, Michal and Orengo, Christine A. and Rost, Burkhard and Greene, Casey S. and Mooney, Sean D. and Friedberg, Iddo and Radivojac, Predrag and Veljkovic, Nevena},
  title     = {An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy},
  series = {Genome Biology},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Genome Biology},
  number    = {184},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13059-016-1037-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166293},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background A major bottleneck in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of life is the assignment of function to proteins. While molecular experiments provide the most reliable annotation of proteins, their relatively low throughput and restricted purview have led to an increasing role for computational function prediction. However, assessing methods for protein function prediction and tracking progress in the field remain challenging. Results We conducted the second critical assessment of functional annotation (CAFA), a timed challenge to assess computational methods that automatically assign protein function. We evaluated 126 methods from 56 research groups for their ability to predict biological functions using Gene Ontology and gene-disease associations using Human Phenotype Ontology on a set of 3681 proteins from 18 species. CAFA2 featured expanded analysis compared with CAFA1, with regards to data set size, variety, and assessment metrics. To review progress in the field, the analysis compared the best methods from CAFA1 to those of CAFA2. Conclusions The top-performing methods in CAFA2 outperformed those from CAFA1. This increased accuracy can be attributed to a combination of the growing number of experimental annotations and improved methods for function prediction. The assessment also revealed that the definition of top-performing algorithms is ontology specific, that different performance metrics can be used to probe the nature of accurate predictions, and the relative diversity of predictions in the biological process and human phenotype ontologies. While there was methodological improvement between CAFA1 and CAFA2, the interpretation of results and usefulness of individual methods remain context-dependent.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SongJiaZhangetal.2016,
  author    = {Song, Ning-Ning and Jia, Yun-Fang and Zhang, Lei and Zhang, Qiong and Huang, Ying and Liu, Xiao-Zhen and Hu, Ling and Lan, Wei and Chen, Ling and Lesch, Klaus-Peter and Chen, Xiaoyan and Xu, Lin and Ding, Yu-Qiang},
  title     = {Reducing central serotonin in adulthood promotes hippocampal neurogenesis},
  series = {Scientific Reports},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Scientific Reports},
  number    = {20338},
  doi       = {10.1038/srep20338},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-168004},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Chronic administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which up-regulates central serotonin (5-HT) system function, enhances adult hippocampal neurogenesis. However, the relationship between central 5-HT system and adult neurogenesis has not fully been understood. Here, we report that lowering 5-HT level in adulthood is also able to enhance adult hippocampal neurogenesis. We used tamoxifen (TM)-induced Cre in Pet1-CreER\(^{T2}\) mice to either deplete central serotonergic (5-HTergic) neurons or inactivate 5-HT synthesis in adulthood and explore the role of central 5-HT in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. A dramatic increase in hippocampal neurogenesis is present in these two central 5-HT-deficient mice and it is largely prevented by administration of agonist for 5-HTR2c receptor. In addition, the survival of new-born neurons in the hippocampus is enhanced. Furthermore, the adult 5-HT-deficient mice showed reduced depression-like behaviors but enhanced contextual fear memory. These findings demonstrate that lowering central 5-HT function in adulthood can also enhance adult hippocampal neurogenesis, thus revealing a new aspect of central 5-HT in regulating adult neurogenesis.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TsaiGrimmChaoetal.2015,
  author    = {Tsai, Yu-Chen and Grimm, Stefan and Chao, Ju-Lan and Wang, Shih-Chin and Hofmeyer, Kerstin and Shen, Jie and Eichinger, Fred and Michalopoulou, Theoni and Yao, Chi-Kuang and Chang, Chih-Hsuan and Lin, Shih-Han and Sun, Y. Henry and Pflugfelder, Gert O.},
  title     = {Optomotor-blind negatively regulates Drosophila eye development by blocking Jak/STAT signaling},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0120236},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-143577},
  pages     = {e0120236},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Organ formation requires a delicate balance of positive and negative regulators. In Drosophila eye development, wingless (wg) is expressed at the lateral margins of the eye disc and serves to block retinal development. The T-box gene optomotor-blind (omb) is expressed in a similar pattern and is regulated by Wg. Omb mediates part of Wg activity in blocking eye development. Omb exerts its function primarily by blocking cell proliferation. These effects occur predominantly in the ventral margin. Our results suggest that the primary effect of Omb is the blocking of Jak/STAT signaling by repressing transcription of upd which encodes the Jak receptor ligand Unpaired.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JiangChenBelimovetal.2012,
  author    = {Jiang, Fan and Chen, Lin and Belimov, Andrey A. and Shaposhnikov, Alexander I. and Gong, Fan and Meng, Xu and Hartung, Wolfram and Jeschke, Dieter W. and Davies, William J. and Dodd, Ian C.},
  title     = {Multiple impacts of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Variovorax paradoxus 5C-2 on nutrient and ABA relations of Pisum sativum},
  series = {Journal of Experimental Botany},
  volume    = {63},
  journal   = {Journal of Experimental Botany},
  number    = {18},
  doi       = {10.1093/jxb/ers301},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-127011},
  pages     = {6421-6430},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Resolving the physiological mechanisms by which rhizobacteria enhance plant growth is difficult, since many such bacteria contain multiple plant growth-promoting properties. To understand further how the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase (ACCd)-containing rhizobacterium Variovorax paradoxus 5C-2 affects plant growth, the flows and partitioning of mineral nutrients and abscisic acid (ABA) and ABA metabolism were studied in pea (Pisum sativum) plants following rhizosphere bacterial inoculation. Although root architecture was not affected, inoculation increased root and shoot biomass, and stomatal conductance, by 20, 15, and 24\%, respectively, and increased N, P, K, Ca, and Mg uptake by 16, 81, 50, 46, and 58\%, respectively. P deposition in inoculated plant roots was 4.9 times higher than that in uninoculated controls. Rhizobacterial inoculation increased root to shoot xylem flows and shoot to root phloem flows of K by 1.8- and 2.1-fold, respectively. In control plants, major sinks for K deposition were the roots and upper shoot (43\% and 49\% of total uptake, respectively), while rhizobacterial inoculation increased K distribution to the lower shoot at the expense of other compartments (xylem, phloem, and upper shoot). Despite being unable to metabolize ABA in vitro, V. paradoxus 5C-2 decreased root ABA concentrations and accumulation by 40-60\%. Although inoculation decreased xylem ABA flows, phloem ABA flows increased. Whether bacterial ACCd attenuates root to shoot ABA signalling requires further investigation, since ABA is critical to maintain growth of droughted plants, and ACCd-containing organisms have been advocated as a means of minimizing growth inhibition of plants in drying soil.},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{AngnideBielitskaBorchertetal.2020,
  author    = {Angnide, Enarile and Bielitska, Iryna and Borchert, Leon and Braun, Louisa and B{\"u}hler, Pascal and Chen, Xinyue and Ho, Katherina and Hofmann, Lena and Kebekus, Melvin and Kubsch, Torbj{\"o}rn and Li, Alexander and Lin, Simon and Mischer, Andreas and Mogus, Mateja and Schmid, Fabian and Schneidawind, Luisa and Voss, Manuela and Wilson, Claire and Wieteska, Filip and Yu, Linda},
  title     = {Chinese Entanglements in Lower Franconian Business},
  editor    = {Lindner, Jonas and Fischer, Doris},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-20987},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-209876},
  pages     = {219},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Using own survey data and interviews, this study analyzes how businesses in Lower Franconia (Unterfranken) are entangled with China. Starting with a bird's-eye-view of the current situation, the study goes on to provide valuable insights from five specific industries. The study shows that a majority of the analyzed firms have some sort of ties to China, be it through Chinese customers, import/export activities, or else.},
  subject      = {China},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DoerkPeterlongoMannermaaetal.2019,
  author    = {D{\"o}rk, Thilo and Peterlongo, Peter and Mannermaa, Arto and Bolla, Manjeet K. and Wang, Qin and Dennis, Joe and Ahearn, Thomas and Andrulis, Irene L. and Anton-Culver, Hoda and Arndt, Volker and Aronson, Kristan J. and Augustinsson, Annelie and Beane Freeman, Laura E. and Beckmann, Matthias W. and Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia and Behrens, Sabine and Bermisheva, Marina and Blomqvist, Carl and Bogdanova, Natalia V. and Bojesen, Stig E. and Brauch, Hiltrud and Brenner, Hermann and Burwinkel, Barbara and Canzian, Federico and Chan, Tsun L. and Chang-Claude, Jenny and Chanock, Stephen J. and Choi, Ji-Yeob and Christiansen, Hans and Clarke, Christine L. and Couch, Fergus J. and Czene, Kamila and Daly, Mary B. and dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel and Dwek, Miriam and Eccles, Diana M. and Ekici, Arif B. and Eriksson, Mikael and Evans, D. Gareth and Fasching, Peter A. and Figueroa, Jonine and Flyger, Henrik and Fritschi, Lin and Gabrielson, Marike and Gago-Dominguez, Manuela and Gao, Chi and Gapstur, Susan M. and Garc{\´i}a-Closas, Montserrat and Garc{\´i}a-S{\´a}enz, Jos{\´e} A. and Gaudet, Mia M. and Giles, Graham G. and Goldberg, Mark S. and Goldgar, David E. and Guen{\´e}l, Pascal and Haeberle, Lothar and Haimann, Christopher A. and H{\aa}kansson, Niclas and Hall, Per and Hamann, Ute and Hartman, Mikael and Hauke, Jan and Hein, Alexander and Hillemanns, Peter and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Hooning, Maartje J. and Hopper, John L. and Howell, Tony and Huo, Dezheng and Ito, Hidemi and Iwasaki, Motoki and Jakubowska, Anna and Janni, Wolfgang and John, Esther M. and Jung, Audrey and Kaaks, Rudolf and Kang, Daehee and Kapoor, Pooja Middha and Khusnutdinova, Elza and Kim, Sung-Won and Kitahara, Cari M. and Koutros, Stella and Kraft, Peter and Kristensen, Vessela N. and Kwong, Ava and Lambrechts, Diether and Le Marchand, Loic and Li, Jingmei and Lindstr{\"o}m, Sara and Linet, Martha and Lo, Wing-Yee and Long, Jirong and Lophatananon, Artitaya and Lubiński, Jan and Manoochehri, Mehdi and Manoukian, Siranoush and Margolin, Sara and Martinez, Elena and Matsuo, Keitaro and Mavroudis, Dimitris and Meindl, Alfons and Menon, Usha and Milne, Roger L. and Mohd Taib, Nur Aishah and Muir, Kenneth and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Nevanlinna, Heli and Neven, Patrick and Newman, William G. and Offit, Kenneth and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Olshan, Andrew F. and Olson, Janet E. and Olsson, H{\aa}kan and Park, Sue K. and Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won and Peto, Julian and Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana and Pohl-Rescigno, Esther and Presneau, Nadege and Rack, Brigitte and Radice, Paolo and Rashid, Muhammad U. and Rennert, Gad and Rennert, Hedy S. and Romero, Atocha and Ruebner, Matthias and Saloustros, Emmanouil and Schmidt, Marjanka K. and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Schneider, Michael O. and Schoemaker, Minouk J. and Scott, Christopher and Shen, Chen-Yang and Shu, Xiao-Ou and Simard, Jaques and Slager, Susan and Smichkoska, Snezhana and Southey, Melissa C. and Spinelli, John J. and Stone, Jennifer and Surowy, Harald and Swerdlow, Anthony J. and Tamimi, Rulla M. and Tapper, William J. and Teo, Soo H. and Terry, Mary Beth and Toland, Amanda E. and Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M. and Torres, Diana and Torres-Mej{\´i}a, Gabriela and Troester, Melissa A. and Truong, Th{\´e}r{\`e}se and Tsugane, Shoichiro and Untch, Michael and Vachon, Celine M. and van den Ouweland, Ans M. W. and van Veen, Elke M. and Vijai, Joseph and Wendt, Camilla and Wolk, Alicja and Yu, Jyh-Cherng and Zheng, Wei and Ziogas, Argyrios and Ziv, Elad and Dunnig, Alison and Pharaoh, Paul D. P. and Schindler, Detlev and Devilee, Peter and Easton, Douglas F.},
  title     = {Two truncating variants in FANCC and breast cancer risk},
  series = {Scientific Reports},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Scientific Reports},
  organization    = {ABCTB Investigators, NBCS Collaborators},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-019-48804-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-222838},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder with 22 disease-causing genes reported to date. In some FA genes, monoallelic mutations have been found to be associated with breast cancer risk, while the risk associations of others remain unknown. The gene for FA type C, FANCC, has been proposed as a breast cancer susceptibility gene based on epidemiological and sequencing studies. We used the Oncoarray project to genotype two truncating FANCC variants (p.R185X and p.R548X) in 64,760 breast cancer cases and 49,793 controls of European descent. FANCC mutations were observed in 25 cases (14 with p.R185X, 11 with p.R548X) and 26 controls (18 with p.R185X, 8 with p.R548X). There was no evidence of an association with the risk of breast cancer, neither overall (odds ratio 0.77, 95\%CI 0.44-1.33, p = 0.4) nor by histology, hormone receptor status, age or family history. We conclude that the breast cancer risk association of these two FANCC variants, if any, is much smaller than for BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations. If this applies to all truncating variants in FANCC it would suggest there are differences between FA genes in their roles on breast cancer risk and demonstrates the merit of large consortia for clarifying risk associations of rare variants.},
  language  = {en}
}