@article{JakubietzSchmidtHolzapfeletal.2020,
  author    = {Jakubietz, Rafael G. and Schmidt, Karsten and Holzapfel, Boris M. and Meffert, Rainer H. and Jakubietz, Michael G.},
  title     = {Pedicled perforator flaps for mid-tibial soft tissue reconstruction in medically compromised patients},
  series = {JPRAS Open},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {JPRAS Open},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jpra.2020.02.002},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229473},
  pages     = {47-55},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background: The soft tissue of the central pretibial area is difficult to reconstruct often requiring free tissue transfer. Especially medi- cally compromised patients are not ideal candidates for free tissue transfer and may benefit from expeditiously harvested local flaps with limited donor site morbidity. As muscle flaps are rare, pedi- cled flaps based on lateral perforators represent an alternative as the arc of rotation can often be limited to 90 °. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patient data was conducted to identify patients over the age of 60 years with comor- bidities that underwent pretibial soft tissue reconstruction with a single-pedicle perforator flap. Patient demographics, size and cause of the defect, flap dimension, arc of rotation and complications were recorded. Results: Five patients with an average age of 71.4 years were in- cluded. The arc of rotation was 69 °, all flaps healed. There were two recurrences of osteomyelitis. Conclusion: Lateral perforators originating from the anterior tib- ial artery or peroneal artery are adequate source vessels for single pedicled perforator flaps even in medically compromised patients. A perforator located proximal to the defect allows limiting the arcof rotation to less than 90 °, which increases the safety of the flap. Patients benefit from a simple procedure without a microvascular anastomosis and a donor site confined to one extremity},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GilbertHeintelJakubietzetal.2018,
  author    = {Gilbert, F. and Heintel, T. M. and Jakubietz, M. G. and K{\"o}stler, H. and Sebald, C. and Meffert, R. H. and Weng, A. M.},
  title     = {Quantitative MRI comparison of multifidus muscle degeneration in thoracolumbar fractures treated with open and minimally invasive approach},
  series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  number    = {75},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12891-018-2001-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-175742},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation has less approach-related morbidity than open screw placement and is allegedly less traumatizing on paravertebral muscles, as there is no requirement to mobilize and retract the adjacent muscle portion. The approach-related long-term effects to the morphology of the paravertebral muscles are unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term amount of fatty degeneration of the multifidus muscle in patients treated with a classical open or a minimally invasive approach. Methods: Fourteen Patients meeting inclusion criteria were selected. In all patients a singular fracture of the thoracolumbar spine with a two-level posterior instrumentation was treated, either using an open approach or a minimally invasive approach. All patients underwent quantitative MRI spectroscopy for quantification of the fatty degeneration in the multifidus muscle as a long-term proof for muscle loss after minimum 4-year follow-up. Clinical outcome was assessed using Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, SF-36 and VA-scale for pain. Results: The minimally invasive approach group failed to show less muscle degeneration in comparison to the open group. Total amount of fatty degeneration was 14.22\% in the MIS group and 12.60\% in the open group (p = 0.64). In accordance to MRI quantitative results there was no difference in the clinical outcome after a mean follow up of 5.9 years (±1.8). Conclusion: As short-term advantages of minimal invasive screw placement have been widely demonstrated, no advantage of the MIS, displaying a significant difference in the amount of fatty degeneration and resulting in a better clinical outcome could be found. Besides the well-known short-term advantage of minimally invasive pedicle screw placement, a long-term advantage, such as less muscle degeneration and thus superior clinical results, compared to the open approach could not be shown.},
  language  = {en}
}