@article{WaszakNorthcottBuchhalteretal.2018,
  author    = {Waszak, Sebastian M and Northcott, Paul A and Buchhalter, Ivo and Robinson, Giles W and Sutter, Christian and Groebner, Susanne and Grund, Kerstin B and Brugi{\`e}res, Laurence and Jones, David T W and Pajtler, Kristian W and Morrissy, A Sorana and Kool, Marcel and Sturm, Dominik and Chavez, Lukas and Ernst, Aurelie and Brabetz, Sebastian and Hain, Michael and Zichner, Thomas and Segura-Wang, Maia and Weischenfeldt, Joachim and Rausch, Tobias and Mardin, Balca R and Zhou, Xin and Baciu, Cristina and Lawerenz, Christian and Chan, Jennifer A and Varlet, Pascale and Guerrini-Rousseau, Lea and Fults, Daniel W and Grajkowska, Wiesława and Hauser, Peter and Jabado, Nada and Ra, Young-Shin and Zitterbart, Karel and Shringarpure, Suyash S and De La Vega, Francisco M and Bustamante, Carlos D and Ng, Ho-Keung and Perry, Arie and MacDonald, Tobey J and Driever, Pablo Hern{\´a}iz and Bendel, Anne E and Bowers, Daniel C and McCowage, Geoffrey and Chintagumpala, Murali M and Cohn, Richard and Hassall, Timothy and Fleischhack, Gudrun and Eggen, Tone and Wesenberg, Finn and Feychting, Maria and Lannering, Birgitta and Sch{\"u}z, Joachim and Johansen, Christoffer and Andersen, Tina V and R{\"o}{\"o}sli, Martin and Kuehni, Claudia E and Grotzer, Michael and Kjaerheim, Kristina and Monoranu, Camelia M and Archer, Tenley C and Duke, Elizabeth and Pomeroy, Scott L and Shelagh, Redmond and Frank, Stephan and Sumerauer, David and Scheurlen, Wolfram and Ryzhova, Marina V and Milde, Till and Kratz, Christian P and Samuel, David and Zhang, Jinghui and Solomon, David A and Marra, Marco and Eils, Roland and Bartram, Claus R and von Hoff, Katja and Rutkowksi, Stefan and Ramaswamy, Vijay and Gilbertson, Richard J and Korshunov, Andrey and Taylor, Michael D and Lichter, Peter and Malkin, David and Gajjar, Amar and Korbel, Jan O and Pfister, Stefan M},
  title     = {Spectrum and prevalence of genetic predisposition in medulloblastoma: a retrospective genetic study and prospective validation in a clinical trial cohort},
  series = {The Lancet Oncology},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {The Lancet Oncology},
  doi       = {10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30242-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233425},
  pages     = {785-798},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background Medulloblastoma is associated with rare hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes; however, consensus medulloblastoma predisposition genes have not been defined and screening guidelines for genetic counselling and testing for paediatric patients are not available. We aimed to assess and define these genes to provide evidence for future screening guidelines. Methods In this international, multicentre study, we analysed patients with medulloblastoma from retrospective cohorts (International Cancer Genome Consortium [ICGC] PedBrain, Medulloblastoma Advanced Genomics International Consortium [MAGIC], and the CEFALO series) and from prospective cohorts from four clinical studies (SJMB03, SJMB12, SJYC07, and I-HIT-MED). Whole-genome sequences and exome sequences from blood and tumour samples were analysed for rare damaging germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes. DNA methylation profiling was done to determine consensus molecular subgroups: WNT (MBWNT), SHH (MBSHH), group 3 (MBGroup3), and group 4 (MBGroup4). Medulloblastoma predisposition genes were predicted on the basis of rare variant burden tests against controls without a cancer diagnosis from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). Previously defined somatic mutational signatures were used to further classify medulloblastoma genomes into two groups, a clock-like group (signatures 1 and 5) and a homologous recombination repair deficiency-like group (signatures 3 and 8), and chromothripsis was investigated using previously established criteria. Progression-free survival and overall survival were modelled for patients with a genetic predisposition to medulloblastoma. Findings We included a total of 1022 patients with medulloblastoma from the retrospective cohorts (n=673) and the four prospective studies (n=349), from whom blood samples (n=1022) and tumour samples (n=800) were analysed for germline mutations in 110 cancer predisposition genes. In our rare variant burden analysis, we compared these against 53 105 sequenced controls from ExAC and identified APC, BRCA2, PALB2, PTCH1, SUFU, and TP53 as consensus medulloblastoma predisposition genes according to our rare variant burden analysis and estimated that germline mutations accounted for 6\% of medulloblastoma diagnoses in the retrospective cohort. The prevalence of genetic predispositions differed between molecular subgroups in the retrospective cohort and was highest for patients in the MBSHH subgroup (20\% in the retrospective cohort). These estimates were replicated in the prospective clinical cohort (germline mutations accounted for 5\% of medulloblastoma diagnoses, with the highest prevalence [14\%] in the MBSHH subgroup). Patients with germline APC mutations developed MBWNT and accounted for most (five [71\%] of seven) cases of MBWNT that had no somatic CTNNB1 exon 3 mutations. Patients with germline mutations in SUFU and PTCH1 mostly developed infant MBSHH. Germline TP53 mutations presented only in childhood patients in the MBSHH subgroup and explained more than half (eight [57\%] of 14) of all chromothripsis events in this subgroup. Germline mutations in PALB2 and BRCA2 were observed across the MBSHH, MBGroup3, and MBGroup4 molecular subgroups and were associated with mutational signatures typical of homologous recombination repair deficiency. In patients with a genetic predisposition to medulloblastoma, 5-year progression-free survival was 52\% (95\% CI 40-69) and 5-year overall survival was 65\% (95\% CI 52-81); these survival estimates differed significantly across patients with germline mutations in different medulloblastoma predisposition genes. Interpretation Genetic counselling and testing should be used as a standard-of-care procedure in patients with MBWNT and MBSHH because these patients have the highest prevalence of damaging germline mutations in known cancer predisposition genes. We propose criteria for routine genetic screening for patients with medulloblastoma based on clinical and molecular tumour characteristics.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{vonBuerenOehlerShalabyetal.2011,
  author    = {von Bueren, Andr{\´e} O. and Oehler, Christoph and Shalaby, Tarek and von Hoff, Katja and Pruschy, Martin and Seifert, Burkhardt and Gerber, Nicolas U. and Warmuth-Metz, Monika and Stearns, Duncan and Eberhart, Charles G. and Kortmann, Rolf D. and Rutkowski, Stefan and Grotzer, Michael A.},
  title     = {c-MYC expression sensitizes medulloblastoma cells to radio- and chemotherapy and has no impact on response in medulloblastoma patients},
  series = {BMC Cancer},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {BMC Cancer},
  number    = {74},
  doi       = {10.1186/1471-2407-11-74},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134185},
  pages     = {1-11},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Background: To study whether and how c-MYC expression determines response to radio-and chemotherapy in childhood medulloblastoma (MB). Methods: We used DAOY and UW228 human MB cells engineered to stably express different levels of c-MYC, and tested whether c-MYC expression has an effect on radio-and chemosensitivity using the colorimetric 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol- 2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium inner salt (MTS) assay, clonogenic survival, apoptosis assays, cell cycle analysis, and western blot assessment. In an effort to validate our results, we analyzed c-MYC mRNA expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from well-documented patients with postoperative residual tumor and compared c-MYC mRNA expression with response to radio-and chemotherapy as examined by neuroradiological imaging. Results: In DAOY -and to a lesser extent in UW228 -cells expressing high levels of c-MYC, the cytotoxicity of cisplatin, and etoposide was significantly higher when compared with DAOY/UW228 cells expressing low levels of c-MYC. Irradiation-and chemotherapy-induced apoptotic cell death was enhanced in DAOY cells expressing high levels of c-MYC. The response of 62 of 66 residual tumors was evaluable and response to postoperative radio-(14 responders (CR, PR) vs. 5 non-responders (SD, PD)) or chemotherapy (23 CR/PR vs. 20 SD/PD) was assessed. c-MYC mRNA expression was similar in primary MB samples of responders and non-responders (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.50, ratio 0.49, 95\% CI 0.008-30.0 and p = 0.67, ratio 1.8, 95\% CI 0.14-23.5, respectively). Conclusions: c-MYC sensitizes MB cells to some anti-cancer treatments in vitro. As we failed to show evidence for such an effect on postoperative residual tumors when analyzed by imaging, additional investigations in xenografts and larger MB cohorts may help to define the exact function of c-MYC in modulating response to treatment.},
  language  = {en}
}