@article{MarxSchindlerMoschetal.2016, author = {Marx, Gernot and Schindler, Achim W. and Mosch, Christoph and Albers, Joerg and Bauer, Michael and Gnass, Irmela and Hobohm, Carsten and Janssens, Uwe and Kluge, Stefan and Kranke, Peter and Maurer, Tobias and Merz, Waltraut and Neugebauer, Edmund and Quintel, Michael and Senninger, Norbert and Trampisch, Hans-Joachim and Waydhas, Christian and Wildenauer, Rene and Zacharowski, Kai and Eikermann, Michaela}, title = {Intravascular volume therapy in adults guidelines from the association of the scientific medical societies in Germany}, series = {European Journal of Anaesthesiology}, volume = {33}, journal = {European Journal of Anaesthesiology}, number = {7}, doi = {10.1097/EJA.0000000000000447}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-188223}, pages = {488-521}, year = {2016}, abstract = {No abstract available.}, language = {en} } @article{KesslerHertelJungkunstetal.2012, author = {Kessler, Michael and Hertel, Dietrich and Jungkunst, Hermann F. and Kluge, J{\"u}rgen and Abrahamczyk, Stefan and Bos, Merijn and Buchori, Damayanti and Gerold, Gerhard and Gradstein, S. Robbert and K{\"o}hler, Stefan and Leuschner, Christoph and Moser, Gerald and Pitopang, Ramadhanil and Saleh, Shahabuddin and Schulze, Christian H. and Sporn, Simone G. and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and Tjitrosoedirdjo, Sri S. and Tscharntke, Teja}, title = {Can Joint Carbon and Biodiversity Management in Tropical Agroforestry Landscapes Be Optimized?}, series = {PLoS One}, volume = {7}, journal = {PLoS One}, number = {10}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0047192}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-132016}, pages = {e47192}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Managing ecosystems for carbon storage may also benefit biodiversity conservation, but such a potential 'win-win' scenario has not yet been assessed for tropical agroforestry landscapes. We measured above-and below-ground carbon stocks as well as the species richness of four groups of plants and eight of animals on 14 representative plots in Sulawesi, Indonesia, ranging from natural rainforest to cacao agroforests that have replaced former natural forest. The conversion of natural forests with carbon stocks of 227-362 Mg C ha\(^{-1}\) to agroforests with 82-211 Mg C ha\(^{-1}\) showed no relationships to overall biodiversity but led to a significant loss of forest-related species richness. We conclude that the conservation of the forest-related biodiversity, and to a lesser degree of carbon stocks, mainly depends on the preservation of natural forest habitats. In the three most carbon-rich agroforestry systems, carbon stocks were about 60\% of those of natural forest, suggesting that 1.6 ha of optimally managed agroforest can contribute to the conservation of carbon stocks as much as 1 ha of natural forest. However, agroforestry systems had comparatively low biodiversity, and we found no evidence for a tight link between carbon storage and biodiversity. Yet, potential win-win agroforestry management solutions include combining high shade-tree quality which favours biodiversity with cacao-yield adapted shade levels.}, language = {en} } @article{HerrmannLotzKaragiannidisetal.2022, author = {Herrmann, Johannes and Lotz, Christopher and Karagiannidis, Christian and Weber-Carstens, Steffen and Kluge, Stefan and Putensen, Christian and Wehrfritz, Andreas and Schmidt, Karsten and Ellerkmann, Richard K. and Oswald, Daniel and Lotz, G{\"o}sta and Zotzmann, Viviane and Moerer, Onnen and K{\"u}hn, Christian and Kochanek, Matthias and Muellenbach, Ralf and Gaertner, Matthias and Fichtner, Falk and Brettner, Florian and Findeisen, Michael and Heim, Markus and Lahmer, Tobias and Rosenow, Felix and Haake, Nils and Lepper, Philipp M. and Rosenberger, Peter and Braune, Stephan and Kohls, Mirjam and Heuschmann, Peter and Meybohm, Patrick}, title = {Key characteristics impacting survival of COVID-19 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation}, series = {Critical Care}, volume = {26}, journal = {Critical Care}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1186/s13054-022-04053-6}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-299686}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background Severe COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often requires extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Recent German health insurance data revealed low ICU survival rates. Patient characteristics and experience of the ECMO center may determine intensive care unit (ICU) survival. The current study aimed to identify factors affecting ICU survival of COVID-19 ECMO patients. Methods 673 COVID-19 ARDS ECMO patients treated in 26 centers between January 1st 2020 and March 22nd 2021 were included. Data on clinical characteristics, adjunct therapies, complications, and outcome were documented. Block wise logistic regression analysis was applied to identify variables associated with ICU-survival. Results Most patients were between 50 and 70 years of age. PaO\(_{2}\)/FiO\(_{2}\) ratio prior to ECMO was 72 mmHg (IQR: 58-99). ICU survival was 31.4\%. Survival was significantly lower during the 2nd wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A subgroup of 284 (42\%) patients fulfilling modified EOLIA criteria had a higher survival (38\%) (p = 0.0014, OR 0.64 (CI 0.41-0.99)). Survival differed between low, intermediate, and high-volume centers with 20\%, 30\%, and 38\%, respectively (p = 0.0024). Treatment in high volume centers resulted in an odds ratio of 0.55 (CI 0.28-1.02) compared to low volume centers. Additional factors associated with survival were younger age, shorter time between intubation and ECMO initiation, BMI > 35 (compared to < 25), absence of renal replacement therapy or major bleeding/thromboembolic events. Conclusions Structural and patient-related factors, including age, comorbidities and ECMO case volume, determined the survival of COVID-19 ECMO. These factors combined with a more liberal ECMO indication during the 2nd wave may explain the reasonably overall low survival rate. Careful selection of patients and treatment in high volume ECMO centers was associated with higher odds of ICU survival.}, language = {en} } @article{DjakovicHennigReinischetal.2023, author = {Djakovic, Lara and Hennig, Thomas and Reinisch, Katharina and Milić, Andrea and Whisnant, Adam W. and Wolf, Katharina and Weiß, Elena and Haas, Tobias and Grothey, Arnhild and J{\"u}rges, Christopher S. and Kluge, Michael and Wolf, Elmar and Erhard, Florian and Friedel, Caroline C. and D{\"o}lken, Lars}, title = {The HSV-1 ICP22 protein selectively impairs histone repositioning upon Pol II transcription downstream of genes}, series = {Nature Communications}, volume = {14}, journal = {Nature Communications}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-023-40217-w}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-358161}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) infection and stress responses disrupt transcription termination by RNA Polymerase II (Pol II). In HSV-1 infection, but not upon salt or heat stress, this is accompanied by a dramatic increase in chromatin accessibility downstream of genes. Here, we show that the HSV-1 immediate-early protein ICP22 is both necessary and sufficient to induce downstream open chromatin regions (dOCRs) when transcription termination is disrupted by the viral ICP27 protein. This is accompanied by a marked ICP22-dependent loss of histones downstream of affected genes consistent with impaired histone repositioning in the wake of Pol II. Efficient knock-down of the ICP22-interacting histone chaperone FACT is not sufficient to induce dOCRs in ΔICP22 infection but increases dOCR induction in wild-type HSV-1 infection. Interestingly, this is accompanied by a marked increase in chromatin accessibility within gene bodies. We propose a model in which allosteric changes in Pol II composition downstream of genes and ICP22-mediated interference with FACT activity explain the differential impairment of histone repositioning downstream of genes in the wake of Pol II in HSV-1 infection.}, language = {en} }