@article{HebestreitZeidlerSchippersetal.2022, author = {Hebestreit, Helge and Zeidler, Cornelia and Schippers, Christopher and de Zwaan, Martina and Deckert, J{\"u}rgen and Heuschmann, Peter and Krauth, Christian and Bullinger, Monika and Berger, Alexandra and Berneburg, Mark and Brandstetter, Lilly and Deibele, Anna and Dieris-Hirche, Jan and Graessner, Holm and G{\"u}ndel, Harald and Herpertz, Stephan and Heuft, Gereon and Lapstich, Anne-Marie and L{\"u}cke, Thomas and Maisch, Tim and Mundlos, Christine and Petermann-Meyer, Andrea and M{\"u}ller, Susanne and Ott, Stephan and Pfister, Lisa and Quitmann, Julia and Romanos, Marcel and Rutsch, Frank and Schaubert, Kristina and Schubert, Katharina and Schulz, J{\"o}rg B. and Schweiger, Susann and T{\"u}scher, Oliver and Ungeth{\"u}m, Kathrin and Wagner, Thomas O. F. and Haas, Kirsten}, title = {Dual guidance structure for evaluation of patients with unclear diagnosis in centers for rare diseases (ZSE-DUO): study protocol for a controlled multi-center cohort study}, series = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, volume = {17}, journal = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1186/s13023-022-02176-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300440}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background In individuals suffering from a rare disease the diagnostic process and the confirmation of a final diagnosis often extends over many years. Factors contributing to delayed diagnosis include health care professionals' limited knowledge of rare diseases and frequent (co-)occurrence of mental disorders that may complicate and delay the diagnostic process. The ZSE-DUO study aims to assess the benefits of a combination of a physician focusing on somatic aspects with a mental health expert working side by side as a tandem in the diagnostic process. Study design This multi-center, prospective controlled study has a two-phase cohort design. Methods Two cohorts of 682 patients each are sequentially recruited from 11 university-based German Centers for Rare Diseases (CRD): the standard care cohort (control, somatic expertise only) and the innovative care cohort (experimental, combined somatic and mental health expertise). Individuals aged 12 years and older presenting with symptoms and signs which are not explained by current diagnoses will be included. Data will be collected prior to the first visit to the CRD's outpatient clinic (T0), at the first visit (T1) and 12 months thereafter (T2). Outcomes Primary outcome is the percentage of patients with one or more confirmed diagnoses covering the symptomatic spectrum presented. Sample size is calculated to detect a 10 percent increase from 30\% in standard care to 40\% in the innovative dual expert cohort. Secondary outcomes are (a) time to diagnosis/diagnoses explaining the symptomatology; (b) proportion of patients successfully referred from CRD to standard care; (c) costs of diagnosis including incremental cost effectiveness ratios; (d) predictive value of screening instruments administered at T0 to identify patients with mental disorders; (e) patients' quality of life and evaluation of care; and f) physicians' satisfaction with the innovative care approach. Conclusions This is the first multi-center study to investigate the effects of a mental health specialist working in tandem with a somatic expert physician in CRDs. If this innovative approach proves successful, it will be made available on a larger scale nationally and promoted internationally. In the best case, ZSE-DUO can significantly shorten the time to diagnosis for a suspected rare disease.}, language = {en} } @article{GordonDaneshianBouwstraetal.2015, author = {Gordon, Sarah and Daneshian, Mardas and Bouwstra, Joke and Caloni, Francesca and Constant, Samuel and Davies, Donna E. and Dandekar, Gudrun and Guzman, Carlos A. and Fabian, Eric and Haltner, Eleonore and Hartung, Thomas and Hasiwa, Nina and Hayden, Patrick and Kandarova, Helena and Khare, Sangeeta and Krug, Harald F. and Kneuer, Carsten and Leist, Marcel and Lian, Guoping and Marx, Uwe and Metzger, Marco and Ott, Katharina and Prieto, Pilar and Roberts, Michael S. and Roggen, Erwin L. and Tralau, Tewes and van den Braak, Claudia and Walles, Heike and Lehr, Claus-Michael}, title = {Non-animal models of epithelial barriers (skin, intestine and lung) in research, industrial applications and regulatory toxicology}, series = {ALTEX: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation}, volume = {32}, journal = {ALTEX: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation}, number = {4}, doi = {10.14573/altex.1510051}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-144275}, pages = {327-378}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Models of the outer epithelia of the human body namely the skin, the intestine and the lung have found valid applications in both research and industrial settings as attractive alternatives to animal testing. A variety of approaches to model these barriers are currently employed in such fields, ranging from the utilization of ex vivo tissue to reconstructed in vitro models, and further to chip-based technologies, synthetic membrane systems and, of increasing current interest, in silico modeling approaches. An international group of experts in the field of epithelial barriers was convened from academia, industry and regulatory bodies to present both the current state of the art of non-animal models of the skin, intestinal and pulmonary barriers in their various fields of application, and to discuss research-based, industry-driven and regulatory-relevant future directions for both the development of new models and the refinement of existing test methods. Issues of model relevance and preference, validation and standardization, acceptance, and the need for simplicity versus complexity were focal themes of the discussions. The outcomes of workshop presentations and discussions, in relation to both current status and future directions in the utilization and development of epithelial barrier models, are presented by the attending experts in the current report.}, language = {en} }