@article{BarthHerrmannTappeetal.2012,
  author    = {Barth, Thomas F. E. and Herrmann, Tobias S. and Tappe, Dennis and Stark, Lorenz and Gr{\"u}ner, Beate and Buttenschoen, Klaus and Hillenbrand, Andreas and Juchems, Markus and Henne-Bruns, Doris and Kern, Petra and Seitz, Hanns M. and M{\"o}ller, Peter and Rausch, Robert L. and Kern, Peter and Deplazes, Peter},
  title     = {Sensitive and Specific Immunohistochemical Diagnosis of Human Alveolar Echinococcosis with the Monoclonal Antibody Em2G11},
  series = {PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pntd.0001877},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-135371},
  pages     = {e1877},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background: Alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is caused by the metacestode stage of Echinococcus multilocularis. Differential diagnosis with cystic echinococcosis (CE) caused by E. granulosus and AE is challenging. We aimed at improving diagnosis of AE on paraffin sections of infected human tissue by immunohistochemical testing of a specific antibody. Methodology/Principal Findings: We have analysed 96 paraffin archived specimens, including 6 cutting needle biopsies and 3 fine needle aspirates, from patients with suspected AE or CE with the monoclonal antibody (mAb) Em2G11 specific for the Em2 antigen of E. multilocularis metacestodes. In human tissue, staining with mAb Em2G11 is highly specific for E. multilocularis metacestodes while no staining is detected in CE lesions. In addition, the antibody detects small particles of E. multilocularis (spems) of less than 1 mm outside the main lesion in necrotic tissue, liver sinusoids and lymphatic tissue most probably caused by shedding of parasitic material. The conventional histological diagnosis based on haematoxylin and eosin and PAS stainings were in accordance with the immunohistological diagnosis using mAb Em2G11 in 90 of 96 samples. In 6 samples conventional subtype diagnosis of echinococcosis had to be adjusted when revised by immunohistology with mAb Em2G11. Conclusions/Significance: Immunohistochemistry with the mAb Em2G11 is a new, highly specific and sensitive diagnostic tool for AE. The staining of small particles of E. multilocularis (spems) outside the main lesion including immunocompetent tissue, such as lymph nodes, suggests a systemic effect on the host.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OsorioMilneKuchenbaeckeretal.2014,
  author    = {Osorio, Ana and Milne, Roger L. and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline and Vaclov{\´a}, Tereza and Pita, Guillermo and Alonso, Rosario and Peterlongo, Paolo and Blanco, Ignacio and de la Hoya, Miguel and Duran, Mercedes and Diez, Orland and Ram{\´o}n y Cajal, Teresa and Konstantopoulou, Irene and Mart{\´i}nez-Bouzas, Christina and Conejero, Raquel Andr{\´e}s and Soucy, Penny and McGuffog, Lesley and Barrowdale, Daniel and Lee, Andrew and Arver, Brita and Rantala, Johanna and Loman, Niklas and Ehrencrona, Hans and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Beattie, Mary S. and Domchek, Susan M. and Nathanson, Katherine and Rebbeck, Timothy R. and Arun, Banu K. and Karlan, Beth Y. and Walsh, Christine and Lester, Jenny and John, Esther M. and Whittemore, Alice S. and Daly, Mary B. and Southey, Melissa and Hopper, John and Terry, Mary B. and Buys, Saundra S. and Janavicius, Ramunas and Dorfling, Cecilia M. and van Rensburg, Elizabeth J. and Steele, Linda and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Ding, Yuan Chun and Hansen, Thomas V. O. and J{\o}nson, Lars and Ejlertsen, Bent and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Infante, Mar and Herr{\´a}ez, Bel{\´e}n and Moreno, Leticia Thais and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and Herzog, Josef and Weeman, Kisa and Manoukian, Siranoush and Peissel, Bernard and Zaffaroni, Daniela and Scuvera, Guilietta and Bonanni, Bernardo and Mariette, Frederique and Volorio, Sara and Viel, Alessandra and Varesco, Liliana and Papi, Laura and Ottini, Laura and Tibiletti, Maria Grazia and Radice, Paolo and Yannoukakos, Drakoulis and Garber, Judy and Ellis, Steve and Frost, Debra and Platte, Radka and Fineberg, Elena and Evans, Gareth and Lalloo, Fiona and Izatt, Louise and Eeles, Ros and Adlard, Julian and Davidson, Rosemarie and Cole, Trevor and Eccles, Diana and Cook, Jackie and Hodgson, Shirley and Brewer, Carole and Tischkowitz, Marc and Douglas, Fiona and Porteous, Mary and Side, Lucy and Walker, Lisa and Morrison, Patrick and Donaldson, Alan and Kennedy, John and Foo, Claire and Godwin, Andrew K. and Schmutzler, Rita Katharina and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Rhiem, Kerstin and Engel, Christoph and Meindl, Alftons and Ditsch, Nina and Arnold, Norbert and Plendl, Hans J{\"o}rg and Niederacher, Dieter and Sutter, Christian and Wang-Gohrke, Shan and Steinemann, Doris and Preisler-Adams, Sabine and Kast, Karin and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Gehrig, Andrea and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and Sinilnikova, Olga M. and Mazoyer, Sylvie and Damiola, Francesca and Poppe, Bruce and Claes, Kathleen and Piedmonte, Marion and Tucker, Kathy and Backes, Floor and Rodr{\´i}guez, Gustavo and Brewster, Wendy and Wakeley, Katie and Rutherford, Thomas and Cald{\´e}s, Trinidad and Nevanlinna, Heli and Aittom{\"a}ki, Kristiina and Rookus, Matti A. and van Os, Theo A. M. and van der Kolk, Lizet and de Lange, J. L. and Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E. J. and van der Hout, A. H. and van Asperen, Christi J. and Gom{\´e}z Garcia, Encarna B. and Encarna, B. and Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline and Coll{\´e}e, J. Margriet and van Deurzen, Carolien H. M. and van der Luijt, Rob B. and Devilee, Peter and Olah, Edith and L{\´a}zaro, Conxi and Teul{\´e}, Alex and Men{\´e}ndez, Mireia and Jakubowska, Anna and Cybulski, Cezary and Gronwald, Jecek and Lubinski, Jan and Durda, Katarzyna and Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna and Johannsson, Oskar Th. and Maugard, Christine and Montagna, Marco and Tognazzo, Silvia and Teixeira, Manuel R. and Healey, Sue and Olswold, Curtis and Guidugli, Lucia and Lindor, Noralane and Slager, Susan and Szabo, Csilla I. and Vijai, Joseph and Robson, Mark and Kauff, Noah and Zhang, Liying and Rau-Murthy, Rohini and Fink-Retter, Anneliese and Singer, Christine F. and Rappaport, Christine and Kaulich, Daphne Geschwantler and Pfeiler, Georg and Tea, Muy-Kheng and Berger, Andreas and Phelan, Catherine M. and Greene, Mark H. and Mai, Phuong L. and Lejbkowicz, Flavio and Andrulis, Irene and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Glendon, Gord and Toland, Amanda Ewart and Bojesen, Anders and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Sunde, Lone and Thomassen, Mads and Kruse, Torben A. and Jensen, Uffe Birk and Friedman, Eitan and Laitman, Yeal and Shimon, Shanie Paluch and Simard, Jaques and Easton, Douglas F. and Offit, Kenneth and Couch, Fergus J. and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Antoniou, Antonis C. and Benitez, Javier},
  title     = {DNA Glycosylases Involved in Base Excision Repair May Be Associated with Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers},
  series = {PLOS Genetics},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {PLOS Genetics},
  number    = {e1004256},
  issn      = {1553-7404},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1004256},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-116820},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the DNA Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway could be associated with cancer risk in carriers of mutations in the high-penetrance susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, given the relation of synthetic lethality that exists between one of the components of the BER pathway, PARP1 (poly ADP ribose polymerase), and both BRCA1 and BRCA2. In the present study, we have performed a comprehensive analysis of 18 genes involved in BER using a tagging SNP approach in a large series of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. 144 SNPs were analyzed in a two stage study involving 23,463 carriers from the CIMBA consortium (the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2). Eleven SNPs showed evidence of association with breast and/or ovarian cancer at p<0.05 in the combined analysis. Four of the five genes for which strongest evidence of association was observed were DNA glycosylases. The strongest evidence was for rs1466785 in the NEIL2 (endonuclease VIII-like 2) gene (HR: 1.09, 95\% CI (1.03-1.16), p = 2.7x10(-3)) for association with breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers, and rs2304277 in the OGG1 (8-guanine DNA glycosylase) gene, with ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR: 1.12 95\% CI: 1.03-1.21, p = 4.8x10(-3)). DNA glycosylases involved in the first steps of the BER pathway may be associated with cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and should be more comprehensively studied.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{vanKoolwijkRamdasIkrametal.2012,
  author    = {van Koolwijk, Leonieke M. E. and Ramdas, Wishal D. and Ikram, M. Kamran and Jansonius, Nomdo M. and Pasutto, Francesca and Hys, Pirro G. and Macgregor, Stuart and Janssen, Sarah F. and Hewitt, Alex W. and Viswanathan, Ananth C. and ten Brink, Jacoline B. and Hosseini, S. Mohsen and Amin, Najaf and Despriet, Dominiek D. G. and Willemse-Assink, Jacqueline J. M. and Kramer, Rogier and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Struchalin, Maksim and Aulchenko, Yurii S. and Weisschuh, Nicole and Zenkel, Matthias and Mardin, Christian Y. and Gramer, Eugen and Welge-L{\"u}ssen, Ulrich and Montgomery, Grant W. and Carbonaro, Francis and Young, Terri L. and Bellenguez, C{\´e}line and McGuffin, Peter and Foster, Paul J. and Topouzis, Fotis and Mitchell, Paul and Wang, Jie Jin and Wong, Tien Y. and Czudowska, Monika A. and Hofman, Albert and Uitterlinden, Andre G. and Wolfs, Roger C. W. and de Jong, Paulus T. V. M. and Oostra, Ben A. and Paterson, Andrew D. and Mackey, David A. and Bergen, Arthur A. B. and Reis, Andre and Hammond, Christopher J. and Vingerling, Johannes R. and Lemij, Hans G. and Klaver, Caroline C. W. and van Duijn, Cornelia M.},
  title     = {Common Genetic Determinants of Intraocular Pressure and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma},
  series = {PLoS Genetics},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {PLoS Genetics},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1002611},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131378},
  pages     = {e1002611},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a highly heritable risk factor for primary open-angle glaucoma and is the only target for current glaucoma therapy. The genetic factors which determine IOP are largely unknown. We performed a genome-wide association study for IOP in 11,972 participants from 4 independent population-based studies in The Netherlands. We replicated our findings in 7,482 participants from 4 additional cohorts from the UK, Australia, Canada, and the Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium 2/Blue Mountains Eye Study. IOP was significantly associated with rs11656696, located in GAS7 at 17p13.1 (p = 1.4 x 10\(^{-8}\)), and with rs7555523, located in TMCO1 at 1q24.1 (p = 1.6 x 10\(^{-8}\)). In a meta-analysis of 4 case-control studies (total N = 1,432 glaucoma cases), both variants also showed evidence for association with glaucoma (p = 2.4 x 10\(^{-2}\) for rs11656696 and p = 9.1 x 10\(^{-4}\) for rs7555523). GAS7 and TMCO1 are highly expressed in the ciliary body and trabecular meshwork as well as in the lamina cribrosa, optic nerve, and retina. Both genes functionally interact with known glaucoma disease genes. These data suggest that we have identified two clinically relevant genes involved in IOP regulation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JohnsonAkiyamaBlackburnetal.2023,
  author    = {Johnson, Michael D. and Akiyama, Kazunori and Blackburn, Lindy and Bouman, Katherine L. and Broderick, Avery E. and Cardoso, Vitor and Fender, Rob P. and Fromm, Christian M. and Galison, Peter and G{\´o}mez, Jos{\´e} L. and Haggard, Daryl and Lister, Matthew L. and Lobanov, Andrei P. and Markoff, Sera and Narayan, Ramesh and Natarajan, Priyamvada and Nichols, Tiffany and Pesce, Dominic W. and Younsi, Ziri and Chael, Andrew and Chatterjee, Koushik and Chaves, Ryan and Doboszewski, Juliusz and Dodson, Richard and Doeleman, Sheperd S. and Elder, Jamee and Fitzpatrick, Garret and Haworth, Kari and Houston, Janice and Issaoun, Sara and Kovalev, Yuri Y. and Levis, Aviad and Lico, Rocco and Marcoci, Alexandru and Martens, Niels C. M. and Nagar, Neil M. and Oppenheimer, Aaron and Palumbo, Daniel C. M. and Ricarte, Angelo and Rioja, Mar{\´i}a  J. and Roelofs, Freek and Thresher, Ann C. and Tiede, Paul and Weintroub, Jonathan and Wielgus, Maciek},
  title     = {Key science goals for the next-generation Event Horizon Telescope},
  series = {Galaxies},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Galaxies},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {2075-4434},
  doi       = {10.3390/galaxies11030061},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-313525},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has led to the first images of a supermassive black hole, revealing the central compact objects in the elliptical galaxy M87 and the Milky Way. Proposed upgrades to this array through the next-generation EHT (ngEHT) program would sharply improve the angular resolution, dynamic range, and temporal coverage of the existing EHT observations. These improvements will uniquely enable a wealth of transformative new discoveries related to black hole science, extending from event-horizon-scale studies of strong gravity to studies of explosive transients to the cosmological growth and influence of supermassive black holes. Here, we present the key science goals for the ngEHT and their associated instrument requirements, both of which have been formulated through a multi-year international effort involving hundreds of scientists worldwide.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GroebnerWorstWeischenfeldtetal.2018,
  author    = {Gr{\"o}bner, Susanne N. and Worst, Barbara C. and Weischenfeldt, Joachim and Buchhalter, Ivo and Kleinheinz, Kortine and Rudneva, Vasilisa A. and Johann, Pascal D. and Balasubramanian, Gnana Prakash and Segura-Wang, Maia and Brabetz, Sebastian and Bender, Sebastian and Hutter, Barbara and Sturm, Dominik and Pfaff, Elke and H{\"u}bschmann, Daniel and Zipprich, Gideon and Heinold, Michael and Eils, J{\"u}rgen and Lawerenz, Christian and Erkek, Serap and Lambo, Sander and Waszak, Sebastian and Blattmann, Claudia and Borkhardt, Arndt and Kuhlen, Michaela and Eggert, Angelika and Fulda, Simone and Gessler, Manfred and Wegert, Jenny and Kappler, Roland and Baumhoer, Daniel and Stefan, Burdach and Kirschner-Schwabe, Renate and Kontny, Udo and Kulozik, Andreas E. and Lohmann, Dietmar and Hettmer, Simone and Eckert, Cornelia and Bielack, Stefan and Nathrath, Michaela and Niemeyer, Charlotte and Richter, G{\"u}nther H. and Schulte, Johannes and Siebert, Reiner and Westermann, Frank and Molenaar, Jan J. and Vassal, Gilles and Witt, Hendrik and Burkhardt, Birgit and Kratz, Christian P. and Witt, Olaf and van Tilburg, Cornelis M. and Kramm, Christof M. and Fleischhack, Gudrun and Dirksen, Uta and Rutkowski, Stefan and Fr{\"u}hwald, Michael and Hoff, Katja von and Wolf, Stephan and Klingebeil, Thomas and Koscielniak, Ewa and Landgraf, Pablo and Koster, Jan and Resnick, Adam C. and Zhang, Jinghui and Liu, Yanling and Zhou, Xin and Waanders, Angela J. and Zwijnenburg, Danny A. and Raman, Pichai and Brors, Benedikt and Weber, Ursula D. and Northcott, Paul A. and Pajtler, Kristian W. and Kool, Marcel and Piro, Rosario M. and Korbel, Jan O. and Schlesner, Matthias and Eils, Roland and Jones, David T. W. and Lichter, Peter and Chavez, Lukas and Zapatka, Marc and Pfister, Stefan M.},
  title     = {The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers},
  series = {Nature},
  volume    = {555},
  journal   = {Nature},
  organization    = {ICGC PedBrain-Seq Project, ICGC MMML-Seq Project,},
  doi       = {10.1038/nature25480},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229579},
  pages     = {321-327},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Pan-cancer analyses that examine commonalities and differences among various cancer types have emerged as a powerful way to obtain novel insights into cancer biology. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of genetic alterations in a pan-cancer cohort including 961 tumours from children, adolescents, and young adults, comprising 24 distinct molecular types of cancer. Using a standardized workflow, we identified marked differences in terms of mutation frequency and significantly mutated genes in comparison to previously analysed adult cancers. Genetic alterations in 149 putative cancer driver genes separate the tumours into two classes: small mutation and structural/copy-number variant (correlating with germline variants). Structural variants, hyperdiploidy, and chromothripsis are linked to TP53 mutation status and mutational signatures. Our data suggest that 7-8\% of the children in this cohort carry an unambiguous predisposing germline variant and that nearly 50\% of paediatric neoplasms harbour a potentially druggable event, which is highly relevant for the design of future clinical trials.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ReiterGenslerRitteretal.2012,
  author    = {Reiter, Theresa and Gensler, Daniel and Ritter, Oliver and Weiss, Ingo and Geistert, Wolfgang and Kaufmann, Ralf and Hoffmeister, Sabine and Friedrich, Michael T. and Wintzheimer, Stefan and D{\"u}ring, Markus and Nordbeck, Peter and Jakob, Peter M. and Ladd, Mark E. and Quick, Harald H. and Bauer, Wolfgang R.},
  title     = {Direct cooling of the catheter tip increases safety for CMR-guided electrophysiological procedures},
  series = {Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance},
  number    = {12},
  doi       = {10.1186/1532-429X-14-12},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134927},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background: One of the safety concerns when performing electrophysiological (EP) procedures under magnetic resonance (MR) guidance is the risk of passive tissue heating due to the EP catheter being exposed to the radiofrequency (RF) field of the RF transmitting body coil. Ablation procedures that use catheters with irrigated tips are well established therapeutic options for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and when used in a modified mode might offer an additional system for suppressing passive catheter heating. Methods: A two-step approach was chosen. Firstly, tests on passive catheter heating were performed in a 1.5 T Avanto system (Siemens Healthcare Sector, Erlangen, Germany) using a ASTM Phantom in order to determine a possible maximum temperature rise. Secondly, a phantom was designed for simulation of the interface between blood and the vascular wall. The MR-RF induced temperature rise was simulated by catheter tip heating via a standard ablation generator. Power levels from 1 to 6 W were selected. Ablation duration was 120 s with no tip irrigation during the first 60 s and irrigation at rates from 2 ml/min to 35 ml/min for the remaining 60 s (Biotronik Qiona Pump, Berlin, Germany). The temperature was measured with fluoroscopic sensors (Luxtron, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) at a distance of 0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm from the catheter tip. Results: A maximum temperature rise of 22.4 degrees C at the catheter tip was documented in the MR scanner. This temperature rise is equivalent to the heating effect of an ablator's power output of 6 W at a contact force of the weight of 90 g (0.883 N). The catheter tip irrigation was able to limit the temperature rise to less than 2 degrees C for the majority of examined power levels, and for all examined power levels the residual temperature rise was less than 8 degrees C. Conclusion: Up to a maximum of 22.4 degrees C, the temperature rise at the tissue surface can be entirely suppressed by using the catheter's own irrigation system. The irrigated tip system can be used to increase MR safety of EP catheters by suppressing the effects of unwanted passive catheter heating due to RF exposure from the MR scanner.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZieglerEhlisWeberetal.2021,
  author    = {Ziegler, Georg C. and Ehlis, Ann-Christine and Weber, Heike and Vitale, Maria Rosaria and Z{\"o}ller, Johanna E. M. and Ku, Hsing-Ping and Schiele, Miriam A. and K{\"u}rbitz, Laura I. and Romanos, Marcel and Pauli, Paul and Kalisch, Raffael and Zwanzger, Peter and Domschke, Katharina and Fallgatter, Andreas J. and Reif, Andreas and Lesch, Klaus-Peter},
  title     = {A Common CDH13 Variant is Associated with Low Agreeableness and Neural Responses to Working Memory Tasks in ADHD},
  series = {Genes},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Genes},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {2073-4425},
  doi       = {10.3390/genes12091356},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-245220},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The cell—cell signaling gene CDH13 is associated with a wide spectrum of neuropsychiatric disorders, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, and major depression. CDH13 regulates axonal outgrowth and synapse formation, substantiating its relevance for neurodevelopmental processes. Several studies support the influence of CDH13 on personality traits, behavior, and executive functions. However, evidence for functional effects of common gene variation in the CDH13 gene in humans is sparse. Therefore, we tested for association of a functional intronic CDH13 SNP rs2199430 with ADHD in a sample of 998 adult patients and 884 healthy controls. The Big Five personality traits were assessed by the NEO-PI-R questionnaire. Assuming that altered neural correlates of working memory and cognitive response inhibition show genotype-dependent alterations, task performance and electroencephalographic event-related potentials were measured by n-back and continuous performance (Go/NoGo) tasks. The rs2199430 genotype was not associated with adult ADHD on the categorical diagnosis level. However, rs2199430 was significantly associated with agreeableness, with minor G allele homozygotes scoring lower than A allele carriers. Whereas task performance was not affected by genotype, a significant heterosis effect limited to the ADHD group was identified for the n-back task. Heterozygotes (AG) exhibited significantly higher N200 amplitudes during both the 1-back and 2-back condition in the central electrode position Cz. Consequently, the common genetic variation of CDH13 is associated with personality traits and impacts neural processing during working memory tasks. Thus, CDH13 might contribute to symptomatic core dysfunctions of social and cognitive impairment in ADHD.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MencacciIsaiasReichetal.2014,
  author    = {Mencacci, Niccol{\´o} E. and Isaias, Ioannis U. and Reich, Martin M. and Ganos, Christos and Plagnol, Vincent and Polke, James M. and Bras, Jose and Hersheson, Joshua and Stamelou, Maria and Pittman, Alan M. and Noyce, Alastair J. and Mok, Kin Y. and Opladen, Thomas and Kunstmann, Erdmute and Hodecker, Sybille and M{\"u}nchau, Alexander and Volkmann, Jens and Samnick, Samuel and Sidle, Katie and Nanji, Tina and Sweeney, Mary G. and Houlden, Henry and Batla, Amit and Zecchinelli, Anna L. and Pezzoli, Gianni and Marotta, Giorgio and Lees, Andrew and Alegria, Paulo and Krack, Paul and Cormier-Dequaire, Florence and Lesage, Suzanne and Brice, Alexis and Heutink, Peter and Gasser, Thomas and Lubbe, Steven J. and Morris, Huw R. and Taba, Pille and Koks, Sulev and Majounie, Elisa and Gibbs, J. Raphael and Singleton, Andrew and Hardy, John and Klebe, Stephan and Bhatia, Kailash P. and Wood, Nicholas W.},
  title     = {Parkinson's disease in GTP cyclohydrolase 1 mutation carriers},
  series = {Brain},
  volume    = {137},
  journal   = {Brain},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1093/brain/awu179},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121268},
  pages     = {2480-92},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {GTP cyclohydrolase 1, encoded by the GCH1 gene, is an essential enzyme for dopamine production in nigrostriatal cells. Loss-of-function mutations in GCH1 result in severe reduction of dopamine synthesis in nigrostriatal cells and are the most common cause of DOPA-responsive dystonia, a rare disease that classically presents in childhood with generalized dystonia and a dramatic long-lasting response to levodopa. We describe clinical, genetic and nigrostriatal dopaminergic imaging ([(123)I]N-ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl) tropane single photon computed tomography) findings of four unrelated pedigrees with DOPA-responsive dystonia in which pathogenic GCH1 variants were identified in family members with adult-onset parkinsonism. Dopamine transporter imaging was abnormal in all parkinsonian patients, indicating Parkinson's disease-like nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation. We subsequently explored the possibility that pathogenic GCH1 variants could contribute to the risk of developing Parkinson's disease, even in the absence of a family history for DOPA-responsive dystonia. The frequency of GCH1 variants was evaluated in whole-exome sequencing data of 1318 cases with Parkinson's disease and 5935 control subjects. Combining cases and controls, we identified a total of 11 different heterozygous GCH1 variants, all at low frequency. This list includes four pathogenic variants previously associated with DOPA-responsive dystonia (Q110X, V204I, K224R and M230I) and seven of undetermined clinical relevance (Q110E, T112A, A120S, D134G, I154V, R198Q and G217V). The frequency of GCH1 variants was significantly higher (Fisher's exact test P-value 0.0001) in cases (10/1318 = 0.75\%) than in controls (6/5935 = 0.1\%; odds ratio 7.5; 95\% confidence interval 2.4-25.3). Our results show that rare GCH1 variants are associated with an increased risk for Parkinson's disease. These findings expand the clinical and biological relevance of GTP cycloydrolase 1 deficiency, suggesting that it not only leads to biochemical striatal dopamine depletion and DOPA-responsive dystonia, but also predisposes to nigrostriatal cell loss. Further insight into GCH1-associated pathogenetic mechanisms will shed light on the role of dopamine metabolism in nigral degeneration and Parkinson's disease.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SilvestriBarrowdaleMulliganetal.2016,
  author    = {Silvestri, Valentina and Barrowdale, Daniel and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Fox, Stephen and Karlan, Beth Y. and Mitchell, Gillian and James, Paul and Thull, Darcy L. and Zorn, Kristin K. and Carter, Natalie J. and Nathanson, Katherine L. and Domchek, Susan M. and Rebbeck, Timothy R. and Ramus, Susan J. and Nussbaum, Robert L. and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Rantala, Johanna and Yoon, Sook-Yee and Caligo, Maria A. and Spugnesi, Laura and Bojesen, Anders and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Thomassen, Mads and Jensen, Uffe Birk and Toland, Amanda Ewart and Senter, Leigha and Andrulis, Irene L. and Glendon, Gord and Hulick, Peter J. and Imyanitov, Evgeny N. and Greene, Mark H. and Mai, Phuong L. and Singer, Christian F. and Rappaport-Fuerhauser, Christine and Kramer, Gero and Vijai, Joseph and Offit, Kenneth and Robson, Mark and Lincoln, Anne and Jacobs, Lauren and Machackova, Eva and Foretova, Lenka and Navratilova, Marie and Vasickova, Petra and Couch, Fergus J. and Hallberg, Emily and Ruddy, Kathryn J. and Sharma, Priyanka and Kim, Sung-Won and Teixeira, Manuel R. and Pinto, Pedro and Montagna, Marco and Matricardi, Laura and Arason, Adalgeir and Johannsson, Oskar Th and Barkardottir, Rosa B. and Jakubowska, Anna and Lubinski, Jan and Izquierdo, Angel and Pujana, Miguel Angel and Balma{\~n}a, Judith and Diez, Orland and Ivady, Gabriella and Papp, Janos and Olah, Edith and Kwong, Ava and Nevanlinna, Heli and Aittom{\"a}ki, Kristiina and Segura, Pedro Perez and Caldes, Trinidad and Van Maerken, Tom and Poppe, Bruce and Claes, Kathleen B. M. and Isaacs, Claudine and Elan, Camille and Lasset, Christine and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and Barjhoux, Laure and Belotti, Muriel and Meindl, Alfons and Gehrig, Andrea and Sutter, Christian and Engel, Christoph and Niederacher, Dieter and Steinemann, Doris and Hahnen, Eric and Kast, Karin and Arnold, Norbert and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Wand, Dorothea and Godwin, Andrew K. and Evans, D. Gareth and Frost, Debra and Perkins, Jo and Adlard, Julian and Izatt, Louise and Platte, Radka and Eeles, Ros and Ellis, Steve and Hamann, Ute and Garber, Judy and Fostira, Florentia and Fountzilas, George and Pasini, Barbara and Giannini, Giuseppe and Rizzolo, Piera and Russo, Antonio and Cortesi, Laura and Papi, Laura and Varesco, Liliana and Palli, Domenico and Zanna, Ines and Savarese, Antonella and Radice, Paolo and Manoukian, Siranoush and Peissel, Bernard and Barile, Monica and Bonanni, Bernardo and Viel, Alessandra and Pensotti, Valeria and Tommasi, Stefania and Peterlongo, Paolo and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and Osorio, Ana and Benitez, Javier and McGuffog, Lesley and Healey, Sue and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Ejlertsen, Bent and Hansen, Thomas V. O. and Steele, Linda and Ding, Yuan Chun and Tung, Nadine and Janavicius, Ramunas and Goldgar, David E. and Buys, Saundra S. and Daly, Mary B. and Bane, Anita and Terry, Mary Beth and John, Esther M. and Southey, Melissa and Easton, Douglas F. and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Antoniou, Antonis C. and Ottini, Laura},
  title     = {Male breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: pathology data from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2},
  series = {Breast Cancer Research},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {Breast Cancer Research},
  number    = {15},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13058-016-0671-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164769},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background BRCA1 and, more commonly, BRCA2 mutations are associated with increased risk of male breast cancer (MBC). However, only a paucity of data exists on the pathology of breast cancers (BCs) in men with BRCA1/2 mutations. Using the largest available dataset, we determined whether MBCs arising in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers display specific pathologic features and whether these features differ from those of BRCA1/2 female BCs (FBCs). Methods We characterised the pathologic features of 419 BRCA1/2 MBCs and, using logistic regression analysis, contrasted those with data from 9675 BRCA1/2 FBCs and with population-based data from 6351 MBCs in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results Among BRCA2 MBCs, grade significantly decreased with increasing age at diagnosis (P = 0.005). Compared with BRCA2 FBCs, BRCA2 MBCs were of significantly higher stage (P for trend = 2 × 10-5) and higher grade (P for trend = 0.005) and were more likely to be oestrogen receptor-positive [odds ratio (OR) 10.59; 95 \% confidence interval (CI) 5.15-21.80] and progesterone receptor-positive (OR 5.04; 95 \% CI 3.17-8.04). With the exception of grade, similar patterns of associations emerged when we compared BRCA1 MBCs and FBCs. BRCA2 MBCs also presented with higher grade than MBCs from the SEER database (P for trend = 4 × 10-12). Conclusions On the basis of the largest series analysed to date, our results show that BRCA1/2 MBCs display distinct pathologic characteristics compared with BRCA1/2 FBCs, and we identified a specific BRCA2-associated MBC phenotype characterised by a variable suggesting greater biological aggressiveness (i.e., high histologic grade). These findings could lead to the development of gender-specific risk prediction models and guide clinical strategies appropriate for MBC management.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KleijnWinfreeBartomeusetal.2015,
  author    = {Kleijn, David and Winfree, Rachael and Bartomeus, Ignasi and Carvalheiro, Lu{\´i}sa G. and Henry, Mickael and Isaacs, Rufus and Klein, Alexandra-Maria and Kremen, Claire and M'Gonigle, Leithen K. and Rader, Romina and Ricketts, Taylor H. and Williams, Neal M. and Adamson, Nancy Lee and Ascher, John S. and B{\´a}ldi, Andr{\´a}s and Bat{\´a}ry, P{\´e}ter and Benjamin, Faye and Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. and Blitzer, Eleanor J. and Bommarco, Riccardo and Brand, Mariette R. and Bretagnolle, Vincent and Button, Lindsey and Cariveau, Daniel P. and Chifflet, R{\´e}my and Colville, Jonathan F. and Danforth, Bryan N. and Elle, Elizabeth and Garratt, Michael P. D. and Herzog, Felix and Holzschuh, Andrea and Howlett, Brad G. and Jauker, Frank and Jha, Shalene and Knop, Eva and Krewenka, Kristin M. and Le F{\´e}on, Violette and Mandelik, Yael and May, Emily A. and Park, Mia G. and Pisanty, Gideon and Reemer, Menno and Riedinger, Verena and Rollin, Orianne and Rundl{\"o}f, Maj and Sardi{\~n}as, Hillary S. and Scheper, Jeroen and Sciligo, Amber R. and Smith, Henrik G. and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and Thorp, Robbin and Tscharntke, Teja and Verhulst, Jort and Viana, Blandina F. and Vaissi{\`e}re, Bernard E. and Veldtman, Ruan and Ward, Kimiora L. and Westphal, Catrin and Potts, Simon G.},
  title     = {Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation},
  series = {Nature Communications},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Nature Communications},
  number    = {7414},
  doi       = {10.1038/ncomms8414},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-151879},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost- effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost- effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.},
  language  = {en}
}