@article{HintzscheJastrowKleineOstmannetal.2012,
  author    = {Hintzsche, Henning and Jastrow, Christian and Kleine-Ostmann, Thomas and K{\"a}rst, Uwe and Schrader, Thorsten and Stopper, Helga},
  title     = {Terahertz electromagnetic fields (0.106 THz) do not induce manifest genomic damage in vitro},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-76268},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Terahertz electromagnetic fields are non-ionizing electromagnetic fields in the frequency range from 0.1 to 10 THz. Potential applications of these electromagnetic fields include the whole body scanners, which currently apply millimeter waves just below the terahertz range, but future scanners will use higher frequencies in the terahertz range. These and other applications will bring along human exposure to these fields. Up to now, only a limited number of investigations on biological effects of terahertz electromagnetic fields have been performed. Therefore, research is strongly needed to enable reliable risk assessment. Cells were exposed for 2 h, 8 h, and 24 h with different power intensities ranging from 0.04 mW/cm2 to 2 mW/cm2, representing levels below, at, and above current safety limits. Genomic damage on the chromosomal level was measured as micronucleus formation. DNA strand breaks and alkali-labile sites were quantified with the comet assay. No DNA strand breaks or alkali-labile sites were observed as a consequence of exposure to terahertz electromagnetic fields in the comet assay. The fields did not cause chromosomal damage in the form of micronucleus induction.},
  subject      = {Toxikologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchraderRieseKurlbaumetal.2021,
  author    = {Schrader, Nikolas and Riese, Thorsten and Kurlbaum, Max and Meybohm, Patrick and Kredel, Markus and Surat, G{\"u}zin and Scherf-Clavel, Oliver and Strate, Alexander and Pospiech, Andreas and Hoppe, Kerstin},
  title     = {Personalized antibiotic therapy for the critically ill: Implementation strategies and effects on clinical outcome of piperacillin therapeutic drug monitoring — a descriptive retrospective analysis},
  series = {Antibiotics},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Antibiotics},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {2079-6382},
  doi       = {10.3390/antibiotics10121452},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250052},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly relevant for an individualized antibiotic therapy and subsequently a necessary tool to reduce multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially in light of diminishing antimicrobial capabilities. Critical illness is associated with profound pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations, which challenge dose finding and the application of particularly hydrophilic drugs such as β-lactam antibiotics. Methods: Implementation strategy, potential benefit, and practicability of the developed standard operating procedures were retrospectively analyzed from January to December 2020. Furthermore, the efficacy of the proposed dosing target of piperacillin in critically ill patients was evaluated. Results: In total, 160 patients received piperacillin/tazobactam therapy and were subsequently included in the study. Of them, 114 patients received piperacillin/tazobactam by continuous infusion and had at least one measurement of piperacillin serum level according to the standard operating procedure. In total, 271 measurements were performed with an average level of 79.0 ± 46.0 mg/L. Seventy-one piperacillin levels exceeded 100 mg/L and six levels were lower than 22.5 mg/L. The high-level and the low-level group differed significantly in infection laboratory parameters (CRP (mg/dL) 20.18 ± 11.71 vs. 5.75 ± 5.33) and renal function [glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.75 m2) 40.85 ± 26.74 vs. 120.50 ± 70.48]. Conclusions: Piperacillin levels are unpredictable in critically ill patients. TDM during piperacillin/tazobactam therapy is highly recommended for all patients. Although our implementation strategy was effective, further strategies implemented into the daily clinical workflow might support the health care staff and increase the clinicians' alertness.},
  language  = {en}
}