@article{ZioutiRummlerSteynetal.2021,
  author    = {Ziouti, Fani and Rummler, Maximilian and Steyn, Beatrice and Thiele, Tobias and Seliger, Anne and Duda, Georg N. and Bogen, Bjarne and Willie, Bettina M. and Jundt, Franziska},
  title     = {Prevention of bone destruction by mechanical loading is not enhanced by the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor CC-292 in myeloma bone disease},
  series = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  number    = {8},
  issn      = {1422-0067},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijms22083840},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-284943},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Limiting bone resorption and regenerating bone tissue are treatment goals in myeloma bone disease (MMBD). Physical stimuli such as mechanical loading prevent bone destruction and enhance bone mass in the MOPC315.BM.Luc model of MMBD. It is unknown whether treatment with the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor CC-292 (spebrutinib), which regulates osteoclast differentiation and function, augments the anabolic effect of mechanical loading. CC-292 was administered alone and in combination with axial compressive tibial loading in the MOPC315.BM.Luc model for three weeks. However, neither CC-292 alone nor its use in combination with mechanical loading was more effective in reducing osteolytic bone disease or rescuing bone mass than mechanical stimuli alone, as evidenced by microcomputed tomography (microCT) and histomorphometric analysis. Further studies are needed to investigate novel anti-myeloma and anti-resorptive strategies in combination with physical stimuli to improve treatment of MMBD.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JobsVontheinKoenigetal.2020,
  author    = {Jobs, Alexander and Vonthein, Reinhard and K{\"o}nig, Inke R. and Sch{\"a}fer, Jane and Nauck, Matthias and Haag, Svenja and Fichera, Carlo Federico and Stiermaier, Thomas and Ledwoch, Jakob and Schneider, Alisa and Valentova, Miroslava and von Haehling, Stephan and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Westermann, Dirk and Lenz, Tobias and Arnold, Natalie and Edelmann, Frank and Seppelt, Philipp and Felix, Stephan and Lutz, Matthias and Hedwig, Felix and Borggrefe, Martin and Scherer, Clemens and Desch, Steffen and Thiele, Holger},
  title     = {Inferior vena cava ultrasound in acute decompensated heart failure: design rationale of the CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10 trial},
  series = {ESC Heart Failure},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {ESC Heart Failure},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1002/ehf2.12598},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-212692},
  pages     = {973 -- 983},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Aims Treating patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) presenting with volume overload is a common task. However, optimal guidance of decongesting therapy and treatment targets are not well defined. The inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and its collapsibility can be used to estimate right atrial pressure, which is a measure of right-sided haemodynamic congestion. The CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10 trial is designed to test the hypothesis that ultrasound assessment of the IVC in addition to clinical assessment improves decongestion as compared with clinical assessment alone. Methods and results CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10 is a randomized, controlled, patient-blinded, multicentre, parallel-group trial randomly assigning 388 patients with ADHF to either decongesting therapy guided by ultrasound assessment of the IVC in addition to clinical assessment or clinical assessment alone. IVC ultrasound will be performed daily between baseline and hospital discharge in all patients. However, ultrasound results will only be reported to treating physicians in the intervention group. Treatment target is relief of congestion-related signs and symptoms in both groups with the additional goal to reduce the IVC diameter ≤21 mm and increase IVC collapsibility >50\% in the intervention group. The primary endpoint is change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide from baseline to hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints evaluate feasibility, efficacy of decongestion on other scales, and the impact of the intervention on clinical endpoints. Conclusions CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10 will investigate whether IVC ultrasound supplementing clinical assessment improves decongestion in patients admitted for ADHF.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VoigtThieleWetzkeetal.2021,
  author    = {Voigt, Gesche M. and Thiele, Dominik and Wetzke, Martin and Weidemann, J{\"u}rgen and Parpatt, Patricia-Maria and Welte, Tobias and Seidenberg, J{\"u}rgen and Vogelberg, Christian and Koster, Holger and Rohde, Gernot G. U. and H{\"a}rtel, Christoph and Hansen, Gesine and Kopp, Matthias V.},
  title     = {Interobserver agreement in interpretation of chest radiographs for pediatric community acquired pneumonia: Findings of the pedCAPNETZ-cohort},
  series = {Pediatric Pulmonology},
  volume    = {56},
  journal   = {Pediatric Pulmonology},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.1002/ppul.25528},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-244705},
  pages     = {2676 -- 2685},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Although chest radiograph (CXR) is commonly used in diagnosing pediatric community acquired pneumonia (pCAP), limited data on interobserver agreement among radiologists exist. PedCAPNETZ is a prospective, observational, and multicenter study on pCAP. N = 233 CXR from patients with clinical diagnosis of pCAP were retrieved and n = 12 CXR without pathological findings were added. All CXR were interpreted by a radiologist at the site of recruitment and by two external, blinded pediatric radiologists. To evaluate interobserver agreement, the reporting of presence or absence of pCAP in CXR was analyzed, and prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) statistical testing was applied. Overall, n = 190 (82\%) of CXR were confirmed as pCAP by two external pediatric radiologists. Compared with patients with pCAP negative CXR, patients with CXR-confirmed pCAP displayed higher C-reactive protein levels and a longer duration of symptoms before enrollment (p < .007). Further parameters, that is, age, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation showed no significant difference. The interobserver agreement between the onsite radiologists and each of the two independent pediatric radiologists for the presence of pCAP was poor to fair (69\%; PABAK = 0.39\% and 76\%; PABAK = 0.53, respectively). The concordance between the external radiologists was fair (81\%; PABAK = 0.62). With regard to typical CXR findings for pCAP, chance corrected interrater agreement was highest for pleural effusions, infiltrates, and consolidations and lowest for interstitial patterns and peribronchial thickening. Our data show a poor interobserver agreement in the CXR-based diagnosis of pCAP and emphasized the need for harmonized interpretation standards.},
  language  = {en}
}