@article{FuchsKreczyBrueckneretal.2022,
  author    = {Fuchs, Andreas and Kreczy, Dorothea and Br{\"u}ckner, Theresa and Gbureck, Uwe and Stahlhut, Philipp and Bengel, Melanie and Hoess, Andreas and Nies, Berthold and Bator, Julia and Klammert, Uwe and Linz, Christian and Ewald, Andrea},
  title     = {Bone regeneration capacity of newly developed spherical magnesium phosphate cement granules},
  series = {Clinical Oral Investigations},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Clinical Oral Investigations},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {1436-3771},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00784-021-04231-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-268872},
  pages     = {2619-2633},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Objectives Magnesium phosphate-based cements begin to catch more attention as bone substitute materials and especially as alternatives for the more commonly used calcium phosphates. In bone substitutes for augmentation purposes, atraumatic materials with good biocompatibility and resorbability are favorable. In the current study, we describe the in vivo testing of novel bone augmentation materials in form of spherical granules based on a calcium-doped magnesium phosphate (CaMgP) cement. Materials and Methods Granules with diameters between 500 and 710 μm were fabricated via the emulsification of CaMgP cement pastes in a lipophilic liquid. As basic material, two different CaMgP formulations were used. The obtained granules were implanted into drill hole defects at the distal femoral condyle of 27 New Zealand white rabbits for 6 and 12 weeks. After explantation, the femora were examined via X-ray diffraction analysis, histological staining, radiological examination, and EDX measurement. Results Both granule types display excellent biocompatibility without any signs of inflammation and allow for proper bone healing without the interposition of connective tissue. CaMgP granules show a fast and continuous degradation and enable fully adequate bone regeneration. Conclusions Due to their biocompatibility, their degradation behavior, and their completely spherical morphology, these CaMgP granules present a promising bone substitute material for bone augmentation procedures, especially in sensitive areas. Clinical Relevance The mostly insufficient local bone supply after tooth extractions complicates prosthetic dental restoration or makes it even impossible. Therefore, bone augmentation procedures are oftentimes inevitable. Spherical CaMgP granules may represent a valuable bone replacement material in many situations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlammertMuellerHellmannetal.2015,
  author    = {Klammert, Uwe and M{\"u}ller, Thomas D. and Hellmann, Tina V. and Wuerzler, Kristian K. and Kotzsch, Alexander and Schliermann, Anna and Schmitz, Werner and Kuebler, Alexander C. and Sebald, Walter and Nickel, Joachim},
  title     = {GDF-5 can act as a context-dependent BMP-2 antagonist},
  series = {BMC Biology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {BMC Biology},
  number    = {77},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12915-015-0183-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-125550},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and growth and differentiation factor (GDF)-5 are two related transforming growth factor (TGF)-β family members with important functions in embryonic development and tissue homeostasis. BMP-2 is best known for its osteoinductive properties whereas GDF-5—as evident from its alternative name, cartilage derived morphogenetic protein 1—plays an important role in the formation of cartilage. In spite of these differences both factors signal by binding to the same subset of BMP receptors, raising the question how these different functionalities are generated. The largest difference in receptor binding is observed in the interaction with the type I receptor BMPR-IA. GDF-5, in contrast to BMP-2, shows preferential binding to the isoform BMPR-IB, which is abrogated by a single amino acid (A57R) substitution. The resulting variant, GDF-5 R57A, represents a "BMP-2 mimic" with respect to BMP receptor binding. In this study we thus wanted to analyze whether the two growth factors can induce distinct signals via an identically composed receptor. Results Unexpectedly and dependent on the cellular context, GDF-5 R57A showed clear differences in its activity compared to BMP-2. In ATDC-5 cells, both ligands induced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression with similar potency. But in C2C12 cells, the BMP-2 mimic GDF-5 R57A (and also wild-type GDF-5) clearly antagonized BMP-2-mediated ALP expression, despite signaling in both cell lines occurring solely via BMPR-IA. The BMP-2- antagonizing properties of GDF-5 and GDF-5 R57A could also be observed in vivo when implanting BMP-2 and either one of the two GDF-5 ligands simultaneously at heterotopic sites. Conclusions Although comparison of the crystal structures of the GDF-5 R57A:BMPR-IAEC- and BMP-2:BMPR-IAEC complex revealed small ligand-specific differences, these cannot account for the different signaling characteristics because the complexes seem identical in both differently reacting cell lines. We thus predict an additional component, most likely a not yet identified GDF-5-specific co-receptor, which alters the output of the signaling complexes. Hence the presence or absence of this component then switches GDF-5′s signaling capabilities to act either similar to BMP-2 or as a BMP-2 antagonist. These findings might shed new light on the role of GDF-5, e.g., in cartilage maintenance and/or limb development in that it might act as an inhibitor of signaling events initiated by other BMPs.},
  language  = {en}
}