@article{HsuKuegelKemmeretal.2016,
  author    = {Hsu, Pin-Jui and K{\"u}gel, Jens and Kemmer, Jeannette and Toldin, Francesco Parisen and Mauerer, Tobias and Vogt, Matthias and Assaad, Fakher and Bode, Matthias},
  title     = {Coexistence of charge and ferromagnetic order in fcc Fe},
  series = {Nature Communications},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Nature Communications},
  doi       = {10.1038/ncomms10949},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-173969},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Phase coexistence phenomena have been intensively studied in strongly correlated materials where several ordered states simultaneously occur or compete. Material properties critically depend on external parameters and boundary conditions, where tiny changes result in qualitatively different ground states. However, up to date, phase coexistence phenomena have exclusively been reported for complex compounds composed of multiple elements. Here we show that charge- and magnetically ordered states coexist in double-layer Fe/Rh(001). Scanning tunnelling microscopy and spectroscopy measurements reveal periodic charge-order stripes below a temperature of 130 K. Close to liquid helium temperature, they are superimposed by ferromagnetic domains as observed by spin-polarized scanning tunnelling microscopy. Temperature-dependent measurements reveal a pronounced cross-talk between charge and spin order at the ferromagnetic ordering temperature about 70 K, which is successfully modelled within an effective Ginzburg-Landau ansatz including sixth-order terms. Our results show that subtle balance between structural modifications can lead to competing ordering phenomena.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KuonBlasiUnsoeldetal.2022,
  author    = {Kuon, Jonas and Blasi, Miriam and Uns{\"o}ld, Laura and Vogt, Jeannette and Mehnert, Anja and Alt-Epping, Bernd and Oorschot, Birgitt van and Sistermanns, Jochen and Ahlborn, Miriam and Ritterbusch, Ulrike and Stevens, Susanne and Kahl, Christoph and Ruellan, Anne and Matthias, Kathrin and Kubin, Thomas and Stahlhut, Kerstin and Heider, Andrea and Lordick, Florian and Thomas, Michael},
  title     = {Impact of molecular alterations on quality of life and prognostic understanding over time in patients with incurable lung cancer: a multicenter, longitudinal, prospective cohort study},
  series = {Supportive Care in Cancer},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Supportive Care in Cancer},
  number    = {4},
  organization    = {Arbeitsgemeinschaft Palliativmedizin (APM) of the German Cancer Society (DKG)},
  issn      = {0941-4355},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00520-021-06736-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-308211},
  pages     = {3131-3140},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate changes over time in quality of life (QoL) in incurable lung cancer patients and the impact of determinants like molecular alterations (MA). Methods In a prospective, longitudinal, multicentric study, we assessed QoL, symptom burden, psychological distress, unmet needs, and prognostic understanding of patients diagnosed with incurable lung cancer at the time of the diagnosis (T0) and after 3 (T1), 6 (T2) and 12 months (T3) using validated questionnaires like FACT-L, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT), PHQ-4, SCNS-SF-34, and SEIQoL. Results Two hundred seventeen patients were enrolled, 22 (10\%) with reported MA. QoL scores improved over time, with a significant trend for DT, PHQ-4, and SCNS-SF-34. Significant determinants for stable or improving scores over time were survival > 6 months, performance status at the time of diagnosis, and presence of MA. Patients with MA showed better QoL scores (FACT-L at T1 104.4 vs 86.3; at T2 107.5 vs 90.0; at T3 100.9 vs 92.8) and lower psychological distress (NCCN DT at T1 3.3 vs 5; at T2 2.7 vs 4.5; at T3 3.7 vs 4.5; PHQ-4 at T1 2.3 vs 4.1; at T2 1.7 vs 3.6; at T3 2.2 vs 3.6), but also a worsening of the scores at 1 year and a higher percentage of inaccurate prognostic understanding (27 vs 17\%) compared to patients without MA. Conclusion Patients with tumors harboring MA are at risk of QoL deterioration during the course of the disease. Physicians should adapt their communication strategies in order to maintain or improve QoL.},
  language  = {en}
}