@phdthesis{LiessneeEller2021, author = {Liess [n{\´e}e Eller], Anna Katharina Luise}, title = {Understanding the regulation of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2S}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-20419}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-204190}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The ubiquitination of proteins serves as molecular signal to control an enormous number of physiological processes and its dysregulation is connected to human diseases like cancer. The versatility of this signal stems from the diverse ways by which ubiquitin can be attached to its targets. Thus, specificity and tight regulation of the ubiquitination are pivotal requirements of ubiquitin signaling. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) act at the heart of the ubiquitination cascade, transferring ubiquitin from a ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1) to a ubiquitin ligase (E3) or substrate. When cooperating with a RING-type E3, ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes can determine linkage specificity in ubiquitin chain formation. Our understanding of the regulation of E2 activities is still limited at a structural level. The work described here identifies two regulation mechanisms in UBE2S, a cognate E2 of the human RING-type E3 anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). UBE2S elongates ubiquitin chains on APC/C substrates in a Lys11 linkage-specific manner, thereby targeting these substrates for degradation and driving mitotic progression. In addition, UBE2S was found to have a role in DNA repair by enhancing non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and causing transcriptional arrest at DNA damage sites in homologous recombination (HR). Furthermore, UBE2S overexpression is a characteristic feature of many cancer types and is connected to poor prognosis and diminished response to therapy. The first regulatory mechanism uncovered in this thesis involves the intramolecular auto-ubiquitination of a particular lysine residue (Lys+5) close to the active site cysteine, presumably through conformational flexibility of the active site region. The Lys+5-linked ubiquitin molecule adopts a donor-like, 'closed' orientation towards UBE2S, thereby conferring auto-inhibition. Notably, Lys+5 is a major physiological ubiquitination site in ~25\% of the human E2 enzymes, thus providing regulatory opportunities beyond UBE2S. Besides the active, monomeric state and the auto-inhibited state caused by auto-ubiquitination, I discovered that UBE2S can adopt a dimeric state. The latter also provides an auto-inhibited state, in which ubiquitin transfer is blocked via the obstruction of donor binding. UBE2S dimerization is promoted by its unique C-terminal extension, suppresses auto-ubiquitination and thereby the proteasomal degradation of UBE2S. Taken together, the data provided in this thesis illustrate the intricate ways by which UBE2S activity is fine-tuned and the notion that structurally diverse mechanisms have evolved to restrict the first step in the catalytic cycle of E2 enzymes.}, subject = {E2}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Orth2021, author = {Orth, Barbara}, title = {Identification of an atypical peptide binding mode of the BTB domain of the transcription factor MIZ1 with a HUWE1-derived peptide}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-25044}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250447}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Ubiquitination is a posttranslational modification with immense impact on a wide range of cellular processes, including proteasomal degradation, membrane dynamics, transcription, translation, cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA repair and immunity. These diverse functions stem from the various ubiquitin chain types, topologies, and attachment sites on substrate proteins. Substrate recruitment and modification on lysine, serine or threonine residues is catalyzed by ubiquitin ligases (E3s). An important E3 that decides about the fate of numerous substrates is the HECT-type ubiquitin ligase HUWE1. Depending on the substrate, HUWE1 is involved in different processes, such as cell proliferation and differentiation, DNA repair, and transcription. One of the transcription factors that is ubiquitinated by HUWE1 is the MYC interacting zinc finger protein 1 (MIZ1). MIZ1 is a BTB/POZ (Bric-{\`a}-brac, Tramtrack and Broad-Complex/Pox virus and zinc finger) zinc finger (ZF) protein that binds to DNA through its 13 C2H2-type zinc fingers and either activates or represses the transcription of target genes, including genes involved in cell cycle arrest, such as P21CIP1 (CDKN1A). The precise functions of MIZ1 depend on its interactions with the MYC-MAX heterodimer, but also its heterodimerization with other BTB-ZF proteins, such as BCL6 or NAC1. How MIZ1 interacts with HUWE1 has not been studied and, as a consequence, it has not been possible to rationally develop tools to manipulate this interaction with specificity in order to better understand the effects of the interaction on the transcriptional function of MIZ1 on target genes or processes downstream. One aspect of my research, therefore, aimed at characterizing the MIZ1-HUWE1 interaction at a structural level. I determined a crystal structure of the MIZ1-BTB-domain in complex with a peptide, referred to as ASC, derived from a C terminal region of HUWE1, previously named 'activation segment'. The binding mode observed in this crystal structure could be validated by binding and activity assays in vitro and by cell-based co-IP experiments in the context of N-terminally truncated HUWE1 constructs. I was not able to provide unambiguous evidence for the identified binding mode in the context of full-length HUWE1, indicating that MIZ1 recognition by HUWE1 requires yet unknown regions in the cell. While the structural details of the MIZ1-HUWE1 interaction remains to be elucidated in the context of the full-length proteins, the binding mode between MIZ1BTB and ASC revealed an interesting, atypical structural feature of the BTB domain of MIZ1 that, to my knowledge, has not been described for other BTB-ZF proteins: The B3 region in MIZ1BTB is conformationally malleable, which allows for a HUWE1-ASC-peptide-mediated β-sheet extension of the upper B1/B2-strands, resulting in a mixed, 3 stranded β-sheet. Such β-sheet extension does not appear to occur in other homo- or heterodimeric BTB-ZF proteins, including MIZ1-heterodimers, since these proteins typically possess a pre-formed B3-strand in at least one subunit. Instead, BCL6 co repressor-derived peptides (SMRT and BCOR) were found to extend the lower β-sheet in BCL6BTB by binding to an adjacent 'lateral groove'. This interaction follows a 1:1 stoichiometry, whereas the MIZ1BTB-ASC-complex shows a 2:1 stoichiometry. The crystal structure of the MIZ1BTB-ASC-complex I determined, along with comparative binding studies of ASC with monomeric, homodimeric, and heterodimeric MIZ1BTB variants, respectively, suggests that ASC selects for MIZ1BTB homodimers. The structural data I generated may serve as an entry point for the prediction of additional interaction partners of MIZ1 that also have the ability to extend the upper β-sheet of MIZ1BTB. If successful, such interaction partners and structures thereof might aid the design of peptidomimetics or small-molecule inhibitors of MIZ1 signaling. Proof-of-principle for such a structure-guided approach targeting BTB domains has been provided by small-molecule inhibitors of BCL6BTB co-repressors interactions. If a similar approach led to molecules that interfere with specific interactions of MIZ1, they would provide intriguing probes to study MIZ1 biology and may eventually allow for the development of MIZ1-directed cancer therapeutics.}, subject = {Ubiquitin}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Kraus2021, author = {Kraus, Amelie Johanna}, title = {H2A.Z - a molecular guardian of RNA polymerase II transcription in African trypanosomes}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-25056}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250568}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In eukaryotes, the enormously long DNA molecules need to be packaged together with histone proteins into nucleosomes and further into compact chromatin structures to fit it into the nucleus. This nuclear organisation interferes with all phases of transcription that require the polymerase to bind to DNA. During transcription - the process in which the hereditary information stored in DNA is transferred to many transportable RNA molecules - nucleosomes form a physical obstacle for polymerase progression. Thus, transcription is usually accompanied by processes mediating nucleosome destabilisation, including post-translational histone modifications (PTMs) or exchange of canonical histones by their variant forms. To the best of our knowledge, acetylation of histones has the highest capability to induce chromatin opening. The lysine modification can destabilise histone-DNA interactions within a nucleosome and can serve as a binding site for various chromatin remodelers that can modify the nucleosome composition. For example, H4 acetylation can impede chromatin folding and can stimulate the exchange of canonical H2A histone by its variant form H2A.Z at transcription start sites (TSSs) in many eukaryotes, including humans. As histone H4, H2A.Z can be post-translationally acetylated and as acetylated H4, acetylated H2A.Z is enriched at TSSs suggested to be critical for transcription. However, thus far, it has been difficult to study the cause and consequence of H2A.Z acetylation. Even though, genome-wide chromatin profiling studies such as ChIP-seq have already revealed the genomic localisation of many histone PTMs and variant proteins, they can only be used to study individual chromatin marks and not to identify all factors important for establishing a distinct chromatin structure. This would require a comprehensive understanding of all marks associated to a specific genomic locus. However, thus far, such analyses of locus-specific chromatin have only been successful for repetitive regions, such as telomeres. In my doctoral thesis, I used the unicellular parasite Trypanosoma brucei as a model system for chromatin biology and took advantage of its chromatin landscape with TSSs comprising already 7\% of the total T. brucei genome (humans: 0.00000156\%). Atypical for a eukaryote, the protein-coding genes are arranged in long polycistronic transcription units (PTUs). Each PTU is controlled by its own ~10 kb-wide TSS, that lies upstream of the PTU. As observed in other eukaryotes, TSSs are enriched with nucleosomes containing acetylated histones and the histone variant H2A.Z. This is why I used T. brucei to particularly investigate the TSS-specific chromatin structures and to identify factors involved in H2A.Z deposition and transcription regulation in eukaryotes. To this end, I established an approach for locus-specific chromatin isolation that would allow me to identify the TSSs- and non-TSS-specific chromatin marks. Later, combining the approach with a method for quantifying lysine-specific histone acetylation levels, I found H2A.Z and H4 acetylation enriched in TSSs-nucleosomes and mediated by the histone acetyltransferases HAT1 and HAT2. Depletion of HAT2 reduced the levels of TSS-specific H4 acetylation, affected targeted H2A.Z deposition and shifted the sites of transcription initiation. Whereas HAT1 depletion had only a minor effect on H2A.Z deposition, it had a strong effect on H2A.Z acetylation and transcription levels. My findings demonstrate a clear link between histone acetylation, H2A.Z deposition and transcription initiation in the early diverged unicellular parasite T. brucei, which was thus far not possible to determine in other eukaryotes. Overall, my study highlights the usefulness of T. brucei as a model system for studying chromatin biology. My findings allow the conclusion that H2A.Z regardless of its modification state defines sites of transcription initiation, whereas H2A.Z acetylation is essential co-factor for transcription initiation. Altogether, my data suggest that TSS-specific chromatin establishment is one of the earliest developed mechanisms to control transcription initiation in eukaryotes.}, subject = {Chromatin}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{MonyNair2021, author = {Mony Nair, Rahul}, title = {Elucidating ubiquitin recognition by the HECT-type ubiquitin ligase HUWE1}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-22103}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-221030}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The small protein modifier ubiquitin is at the heart of an immensely versatile posttranslational modification system that orchestrates countless physiological and disease-associated cellular processes. Key to this versatility are the manifold modifications that can be assembled from ubiquitin "building blocks" and are associated with specific functional outcomes for the modified substrates. In particular, ubiquitin molecules can form polymeric chains of distinct lengths and linkage types that give rise to distinct chain conformations, thereby providing recognition sites for specific signaling receptors/effectors. The class of E3 enzymes (ubiquitin ligases) provides critical specificity determinants in ubiquitin linkage formation; it is therefore crucial to unravel precisely how E3 enzymes operate in order to understand the structural basis of ubiquitin signaling and exploit these insights for therapeutic benefit. Overexpression and deregulation of the HECT-type ubiquitin ligase HUWE1 is implicated in several different cancer types and neurodegenerative disorders. It is largely unknown which factors control the ubiquitin modifications formed by HUWE1, how the catalytic HECT domain interacts with functionally distinct ubiquitin molecules (donor, acceptor and regulatory ubiquitin molecules) and which conformational transitions enable these interactions during ubiquitin chain formation. One aim of this study was to structurally elucidate the recognition of donor ubiquitin by the HECT domain of HUWE1. To this end I utilized a ubiquitin activity-based probe to reconstitute a proxy for a donor ubiquitin-linked conjugate of the HECT domain of HUWE1 and determined its structure by X-ray crystallography. This structure reveals that the donor ubiquitin binds to the C-lobe of HUWE1 in the same way as NEDD4-type ligases, corroborating the idea that HECT ligases utilize a conserved mode of donor ubiquitin recognition. independent of their linkage and substrate specificities. With the help of biochemical analyses, I also validated specific features of the structure, in particular the positioning of the C-terminal tail of the ligase, which was known to be critical for activity. In the newly determined structure, which reflects an "L-shaped", active state of the HECT domain, this tail is fully resolved and coordinated at the N-lobe-C-lobe interface. I defined residues that are critical for this coordination and showed that they are also essential for the activity of HUWE1, including auto-ubiquitination, free ubiquitin chain formation, and substrate ubiquitination. Furthermore, I discovered that the N-lobe of HUWE1 harbors a ubiquitin-binding exosite similar to NEDD4-type ligases and E6AP. My in-vitro activity and binding assays show that HUWE1 uses the exosite for isopeptide bond formation, but that it is dispensable for thioester bond formation. The binding assays further show that the donor ubiquitin loaded HECT domain binds an additional ubiquitin molecule at the exosite more tightly than the apo HECT domain, which possibly suggests allosteric communication between the two sites. Finally, I showed that the ubiquitin activity-based probe (ubiquitin-propargylamine) can label the catalytic cysteine of HUWE1 and NEDD4-type with close to quantitative turn- over, while it does not react with the HECT domain of the evolutionarily more divergent E6AP. The determinants underlying these differential reactivities remain to be explored. Taken, together my results significantly enhance our mechanistic understanding of the catalytic domain of HUWE1 and pinpoint linchpins for therapeutic interventions with the activity of this disease-relevant enzyme.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Ries2020, author = {Ries, Lena Kerstin}, title = {From recognition to reaction: Mechanistic analysis of the interactions of the HECT ligase E6AP with ubiquitin}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-17960}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-179609}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The ubiquitination of proteins controls a multitude of physiological processes. This versatility of ubiquitin as a molecular signal arises from the diverse ways by which it can be attached to target proteins. Different ubiquitination patterns are then translated into different downstream consequences. Due to the enormous complexity of possible ubiquitin modifications, the ubiquitination machinery must be highly specific and tightly controlled. Ubiquitination proceeds through an enzymatic cascade, the last step of which is catalyzed by the E3 enzyme family. E3 enzymes are the crucial regulators since they dictate the specificity of substrate selection and modification. Deregulation of the HECT-type ubiquitin ligase E6AP (UBE3A) is implicated in human papilloma virus-induced cervical tumorigenesis and several neurodevelopmental disorders. Yet the structural underpinnings of activity, regulation and specificity in this crucial ligase are incompletely understood. One aim of this study was to unravel the role of the a1'-helix N-terminal to the HECT domain that was found to be a key element mediating regulation and oligomerization in other HECT ligases. I found that most N-terminally extended HECT domain constructs were insoluble when expressed in E. coli, indicating that additional regions N-terminal to the tested fragments may be essential to protect this highly hydrophobic helix from causing aggregation. Another question addressed in this study was how E6AP builds ubiquitin chains. Using single-turnover experiments, I showed that ubiquitin-loaded E6AP is unable to transfer an additional ubiquitin molecule onto a stably linked ubiquitin-E6AP complex. This indicates that E6AP cannot assemble chains on its active site and may instead follow a sequential addition mechanism in which one ubiquitin molecule is transferred at a time to the target protein. Using NMR spectroscopy and extensive mutational analyses, the determinants of ubiquitin recognition by the C-lobe of E6AP were unraveled and assigned to particular steps in the catalytic cycle. A functionally critical interface was identified that is specifically required during thioester formation between the C-terminus of ubiquitin and the ligase active site. This interface resembles the one utilized by NEDD4-type enzymes, suggesting a conserved ubiquitin binding mode across HECT ligases, independent of their linkage specificities. Moreover, I identified critical surface patches on ubiquitin and in the N- and C-terminal portions of the catalytic domain of E6AP that are important for the subsequent step of isopeptide bond formation. I also uncovered key determinants of the Lys48-linkage specificity of E6AP, both in the E6AP HECT domain and ubiquitin itself. This includes the C-terminal tail of E6AP and a hydrophilic surface region of ubiquitin in proximity to the acceptor site, Lys48. It is thus tempting to speculate that ubiquitin linkage formation by E6AP is substrate-assisted. Taken together, my results improve our mechanistic understanding of the structure-function relationship between E6AP and ubiquitin, thus providing a basis for ultimately manipulating the functions of this HECT ligase for therapeutic applications.}, subject = {Ubiquitin}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{PaciosMichelena2023, author = {Pacios Michelena, Anabel}, title = {Molecular insights into the complex formed by the actin cytoskeleton related protein VASP and the inhibitory postsynaptic scaffolding protein gephyrin}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-21337}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213373}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Gephyrin is a 93 kDa moonlighting protein, which is involved in the last two steps of the molybdenum cofactor (Moco) biosynthesis pathway while at the same time playing a central role in the anchoring, clustering and stabilization of glycine receptors (GlyRs) ...}, language = {en} }