@article{ZaitsevaHoffmannOttoetal.2022, author = {Zaitseva, Olena and Hoffmann, Annett and Otto, Christoph and Wajant, Harald}, title = {Targeting fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-inducible 14 (Fn14) for tumor therapy}, series = {Frontiers in Pharmacology}, volume = {13}, journal = {Frontiers in Pharmacology}, issn = {1663-9812}, doi = {10.3389/fphar.2022.935086}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-290238}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) and is activated by its ligand TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK). The latter occurs as a homotrimeric molecule in a soluble and a membrane-bound form. Soluble TWEAK (sTWEAK) activates the weakly inflammatory alternative NF-κB pathway and sensitizes for TNF-induced cell death while membrane TWEAK (memTWEAK) triggers additionally robust activation of the classical NF-κB pathway and various MAP kinase cascades. Fn14 expression is limited in adult organisms but becomes strongly induced in non-hematopoietic cells by a variety of growth factors, cytokines and physical stressors (e.g., hypoxia, irradiation). Since all these Fn14-inducing factors are frequently also present in the tumor microenvironment, Fn14 is regularly found to be expressed by non-hematopoietic cells of the tumor microenvironment and most solid tumor cells. In general, there are three possibilities how the tumor-Fn14 linkage could be taken into consideration for tumor therapy. First, by exploitation of the cancer associated expression of Fn14 to direct cytotoxic activities (antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), cytotoxic payloads, CAR T-cells) to the tumor, second by blockade of potential protumoral activities of the TWEAK/Fn14 system, and third, by stimulation of Fn14 which not only triggers proinflammtory activities but also sensitizes cells for apoptotic and necroptotic cell death. Based on a brief description of the biology of the TWEAK/Fn14 system and Fn14 signaling, we discuss the features of the most relevant Fn14-targeting biologicals and review the preclinical data obtained with these reagents. In particular, we address problems and limitations which became evident in the preclinical studies with Fn14-targeting biologicals and debate possibilities how they could be overcome.}, language = {en} } @article{KredelKunzmannSchlegeletal.2017, author = {Kredel, Markus and Kunzmann, Steffen and Schlegel, Paul-Gerhardt and W{\"o}lfl, Matthias and Nordbeck, Peter and B{\"u}hler, Christoph and Lotz, Christopher and Lepper, Philipp M. and Wirbelauer, Johannes and Roewer, Norbert and Muellenbach, Ralf M.}, title = {Double Peripheral Venous and Arterial Cannulation for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Combined Septic and Cardiogenic Shock}, series = {American Journal of Case Reports}, volume = {18}, journal = {American Journal of Case Reports}, doi = {10.12659/AJCR.902485}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158193}, pages = {723-727}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Background: The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ECMO) via peripheral cannulation for septic shock is limited by blood flow and increased afterload for the left ventricle. Case Report: A 15-year-old girl with acute myelogenous leukemia, suffering from severe septic and cardiogenic shock, was treated by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ECMO). Sufficient extracorporeal blood flow matching the required oxygen demand could only be achieved by peripheral cannulation of both femoral arteries. Venous drainage was performed with a bicaval cannula inserted via the left V. femoralis. To accomplish left ventricular unloading, an additional drainage cannula was placed in the left atrium via percutaneous atrioseptostomy (va-va-ECMO). Cardiac function recovered and the girl was weaned from the ECMO on day 6. Successful allogenic stem cell transplantation took place 2 months later. Conclusions: In patients with vasoplegic septic shock and impaired cardiac contractility, double peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-va-ECMO) with transseptal left atrial venting can by a lifesaving option.}, language = {en} } @article{BaurBuentemeyerMegerleetal.2017, author = {Baur, Johannes and B{\"u}ntemeyer, Tjark-Ole and Megerle, Felix and Deutschbein, Timo and Spitzweg, Christine and Quinkler, Marcus and Nawroth, Peter and Kroiss, Matthias and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Fassnacht, Martin and Steger, Ulrich}, title = {Outcome after resection of Adrenocortical Carcinoma liver metastases: a retrospective study}, series = {BMC Cancer}, volume = {17}, journal = {BMC Cancer}, number = {522}, doi = {10.1186/s12885-017-3506-z}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-159409}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Background: Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor 5-year-survival rate (<15\%). A surgical approach is recommended in selected patients if complete resection of distant metastasis can be achieved. To date there are only limited data on the outcome after surgical resection of hepatic metastases of ACC. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the German Adrenocortical Carcinoma Registry was conducted. Patients with liver metastases of ACC but without extrahepatic metastases or incomplete tumour resection were included. Results: Seventy-seven patients fulfilled these criteria. Forty-three patients underwent resection of liver metastases of ACC. Complete tumour resection (R0) could be achieved in 30 (69.8\%). Median overall survival after liver resection was 76.1 months in comparison to 10.1 months in the 34 remaining patients with unresected liver metastases (p < 0.001). However, disease free survival after liver resection was only 9.1 months. Neither resection status (R0/R1) nor extent of liver resection were significant predictive factors for overall survival. Patients with a time interval to the first metastasis/recurrence (TTFR) of greater than 12 months or solitary liver metastases showed significantly prolonged survival. Conclusions: Liver resection in the case of ACC liver metastases can achieve long term survival with a median overall survival of more than 5 years, but disease free survival is short despite metastasectomy. Time to recurrence and single versus multiple metastases are predictive factors for the outcome.}, language = {en} } @article{WiegeringRiegelWagneretal.2017, author = {Wiegering, Armin and Riegel, Johannes and Wagner, Johanna and Kunzmann, Volker and Baur, Johannes and Walles, Thorsten and Dietz, Ulrich and Loeb, Stefan and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Steger, Ulrich and Klein, Ingo}, title = {The impact of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with previously resected colorectal cancer liver metastases}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {12}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0173933}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158036}, pages = {e0173933}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Background 40-50\% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of the disease. One third of these patients will additionally develop pulmonary metastases. Methods 137 consecutive patients with CRLM, were analyzed regarding survival data, clinical, histological data and treatment. Results were stratified according to the occurrence of pulmonary metastases and metastases resection. Results 39\% of all patients with liver resection due to CRLM developed additional lung metastases. 44\% of these patients underwent subsequent pulmonary resection. Patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy showed a significantly better five-year survival compared to patients not qualified for curative resection (5-year survival 71.2\% vs. 28.0\%; p = 0.001). Interestingly, the 5-year survival of these patients was even superior to all patients with CRLM, who did not develop pulmonary metastases (77.5\% vs. 63.5\%; p = 0.015). Patients, whose pulmonary metastases were not resected, were more likely to redevelop liver metastases (50.0\% vs 78.6\%; p = 0.034). However, the rate of distant metastases did not differ between both groups (54.5 vs.53.6; p = 0.945). Conclusion The occurrence of colorectal lung metastases after curative liver resection does not impact patient survival if pulmonary metastasectomy is feasible. Those patients clearly benefit from repeated resections of the liver and the lung metastases.}, language = {en} }