@article{StrackPauliWeyers,
  author    = {Strack, Fritz and Pauli, Paul and Weyers, Peter},
  title     = {Editorial: Emotion and Behavior},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  number    = {313},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00313},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-190177},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchumannSteinbornKuertenetal.,
  author    = {Schumann, Frank and Steinborn, Michael B. and K{\"u}rten, Jens and Cao, Liyu and H{\"a}ndel, Barbara Friederike and Huestegge, Lynn},
  title     = {Restoration of attention by rest in a multitasking world: theory, methodology, and empirical evidence},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867978},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-267913},
  abstract  = {In this work, we evaluate the status of both theory and empirical evidence in the field of experimental rest-break research based on a framework that combines mental-chronometry and psychometric-measurement theory. To this end, we (1) provide a taxonomy of rest breaks according to which empirical studies can be classified (e.g., by differentiating between long, short, and micro-rest breaks based on context and temporal properties). Then, we (2) evaluate the theorizing in both the basic and applied fields of research and explain how popular concepts (e.g., ego depletion model, opportunity cost theory, attention restoration theory, action readiness, etc.) relate to each other in contemporary theoretical debates. Here, we highlight differences between all these models in the light of two symbolic categories, termed the resource-based and satiation-based model, including aspects related to the dynamics and the control (strategic or non-strategic) mechanisms at work. Based on a critical assessment of existing methodological and theoretical approaches, we finally (3) provide a set of guidelines for both theory building and future empirical approaches to the experimental study of rest breaks. We conclude that a psychometrically advanced and theoretically focused research of rest and recovery has the potential to finally provide a sound scientific basis to eventually mitigate the adverse effects of ever increasing task demands on performance and well-being in a multitasking world at work and leisure.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HoubenEbertHesbacheretal.,
  author    = {Houben, Roland and Ebert, Marlies and Hesbacher, Sonja and Kervarrec, Thibault and Schrama, David},
  title     = {Merkel Cell Polyomavirus Large T Antigen is Dispensable in G2 and M-Phase to Promote Proliferation of Merkel Cell Carcinoma Cells},
  series = {Viruses},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Viruses},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {1999-4915},
  doi       = {10.3390/v12101162},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218171},
  abstract  = {Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer frequently caused by the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), and proliferation of MCPyV-positive MCC tumor cells depends on the expression of a virus-encoded truncated Large T antigen (LT) oncoprotein. Here, we asked in which phases of the cell cycle LT activity is required for MCC cell proliferation. Hence, we generated fusion-proteins of MCPyV-LT and parts of geminin (GMMN) or chromatin licensing and DNA replication factor1 (CDT1). This allowed us to ectopically express an LT, which is degraded either in the G1 or G2 phase of the cell cycle, respectively, in MCC cells with inducible T antigen knockdown. We demonstrate that LT expressed only in G1 is capable of rescuing LT knockdown-induced growth suppression while LT expressed in S and G2/M phases fails to support proliferation of MCC cells. These results suggest that the crucial function of LT, which has been demonstrated to be inactivation of the cellular Retinoblastoma protein 1 (RB1) is only required to initiate S phase entry.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LuekeRitterfeldLiszkowski,
  author    = {L{\"u}ke, Carina and Ritterfeld, Ute and Liszkowski, Ulf},
  title     = {In bilinguals' hands: identification of bilingual, preverbal infants at risk for language delay},
  series = {Frontiers in Pediatrics},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Pediatrics},
  issn      = {2296-2360},
  doi       = {10.3389/fped.2022.878163},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-276639},
  abstract  = {Studies with monolingual infants show that the gestural behavior of 1-2-year-olds is a strong predictor for later language competencies and, more specifically, that the absence of index-finger pointing at 12 months seems to be a valid indicator for risk of language delay (LD). In this study a lack of index-finger pointing at 12 months was utilized as diagnostic criterion to identity infants with a high risk for LD at 24 months in a sample of 42 infants growing up bilingually. Results confirm earlier findings from monolinguals showing that 12-month-olds who point with the extended index finger have an advanced language status at 24 months and are less likely language delayed than infants who only point with the whole hand and do not produce index-finger points at 12 months.},
  language  = {en}
}