TY - JOUR A1 - Herm, Lukas-Valentin A1 - Steinbach, Theresa A1 - Wanner, Jonas A1 - Janiesch, Christian T1 - A nascent design theory for explainable intelligent systems JF - Electronic Markets N2 - Due to computational advances in the past decades, so-called intelligent systems can learn from increasingly complex data, analyze situations, and support users in their decision-making to address them. However, in practice, the complexity of these intelligent systems renders the user hardly able to comprehend the inherent decision logic of the underlying machine learning model. As a result, the adoption of this technology, especially for high-stake scenarios, is hampered. In this context, explainable artificial intelligence offers numerous starting points for making the inherent logic explainable to people. While research manifests the necessity for incorporating explainable artificial intelligence into intelligent systems, there is still a lack of knowledge about how to socio-technically design these systems to address acceptance barriers among different user groups. In response, we have derived and evaluated a nascent design theory for explainable intelligent systems based on a structured literature review, two qualitative expert studies, a real-world use case application, and quantitative research. Our design theory includes design requirements, design principles, and design features covering the topics of global explainability, local explainability, personalized interface design, as well as psychological/emotional factors. KW - artificial intelligence KW - explainable artificial intelligence KW - XAI KW - design science research KW - design theory KW - intelligent systems Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323809 SN - 1019-6781 VL - 32 IS - 4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wanner, Jonas A1 - Herm, Lukas-Valentin A1 - Heinrich, Kai A1 - Janiesch, Christian T1 - The effect of transparency and trust on intelligent system acceptance: evidence from a user-based study JF - Electronic Markets N2 - Contemporary decision support systems are increasingly relying on artificial intelligence technology such as machine learning algorithms to form intelligent systems. These systems have human-like decision capacity for selected applications based on a decision rationale which cannot be looked-up conveniently and constitutes a black box. As a consequence, acceptance by end-users remains somewhat hesitant. While lacking transparency has been said to hinder trust and enforce aversion towards these systems, studies that connect user trust to transparency and subsequently acceptance are scarce. In response, our research is concerned with the development of a theoretical model that explains end-user acceptance of intelligent systems. We utilize the unified theory of acceptance and use in information technology as well as explanation theory and related theories on initial trust and user trust in information systems. The proposed model is tested in an industrial maintenance workplace scenario using maintenance experts as participants to represent the user group. Results show that acceptance is performance-driven at first sight. However, transparency plays an important indirect role in regulating trust and the perception of performance. KW - user acceptance KW - intelligent system KW - artificial intelligence KW - trust KW - system transparency Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323829 SN - 1019-6781 VL - 32 IS - 4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Herm, Lukas-Valentin A1 - Janiesch, Christian A1 - Helm, Alexander A1 - Imgrund, Florian A1 - Hofmann, Adrian A1 - Winkelmann, Axel T1 - A framework for implementing robotic process automation projects JF - Information Systems and e-Business Management N2 - Robotic process automation is a disruptive technology to automate already digital yet manual tasks and subprocesses as well as whole business processes rapidly. In contrast to other process automation technologies, robotic process automation is lightweight and only accesses the presentation layer of IT systems to mimic human behavior. Due to the novelty of robotic process automation and the varying approaches when implementing the technology, there are reports that up to 50% of robotic process automation projects fail. To tackle this issue, we use a design science research approach to develop a framework for the implementation of robotic process automation projects. We analyzed 35 reports on real-life projects to derive a preliminary sequential model. Then, we performed multiple expert interviews and workshops to validate and refine our model. The result is a framework with variable stages that offers guidelines with enough flexibility to be applicable in complex and heterogeneous corporate environments as well as for small and medium-sized companies. It is structured by the three phases of initialization, implementation, and scaling. They comprise eleven stages relevant during a project and as a continuous cycle spanning individual projects. Together they structure how to manage knowledge and support processes for the execution of robotic process automation implementation projects. KW - robotic process automation KW - implementation framework KW - project management KW - methodology KW - interview study KW - workshop Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323798 SN - 1617-9846 VL - 21 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Herm, Lukas-Valentin A1 - Janiesch, Christian A1 - Fuchs, Patrick T1 - Der Einfluss von menschlichen Denkmustern auf künstliche Intelligenz – eine strukturierte Untersuchung von kognitiven Verzerrungen JF - HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik N2 - Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) dringt vermehrt in sensible Bereiche des alltäglichen menschlichen Lebens ein. Es werden nicht mehr nur noch einfache Entscheidungen durch intelligente Systeme getroffen, sondern zunehmend auch komplexe Entscheidungen. So entscheiden z. B. intelligente Systeme, ob Bewerber in ein Unternehmen eingestellt werden sollen oder nicht. Oftmals kann die zugrundeliegende Entscheidungsfindung nur schwer nachvollzogen werden und ungerechtfertigte Entscheidungen können dadurch unerkannt bleiben, weshalb die Implementierung einer solchen KI auch häufig als sogenannte Blackbox bezeichnet wird. Folglich steigt die Bedrohung, durch unfaire und diskriminierende Entscheidungen einer KI benachteiligt behandelt zu werden. Resultieren diese Verzerrungen aus menschlichen Handlungen und Denkmustern spricht man von einer kognitiven Verzerrung oder einem kognitiven Bias. Aufgrund der Neuigkeit dieser Thematik ist jedoch bisher nicht ersichtlich, welche verschiedenen kognitiven Bias innerhalb eines KI-Projektes auftreten können. Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, anhand einer strukturierten Literaturanalyse, eine gesamtheitliche Darstellung zu ermöglichen. Die gewonnenen Erkenntnisse werden anhand des in der Praxis weit verbreiten Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) Modell aufgearbeitet und klassifiziert. Diese Betrachtung zeigt, dass der menschliche Einfluss auf eine KI in jeder Entwicklungsphase des Modells gegeben ist und es daher wichtig ist „mensch-ähnlichen“ Bias in einer KI explizit zu untersuchen. N2 - Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly penetrating sensitive areas of everyday human life, resulting in the ability to support humans in complex and difficult tasks. The result is that intelligent systems are capable of handling not only simple but also complex tasks. For example, this includes deciding whether an applicant should be hired or not. Oftentimes, this decision-making can be difficult to comprehend, and consequently incorrect decisions may remain undetected, which is why these implementations are often referred to as a so-called black box. Consequently, there is the threat of unfair and discriminatory decisions by an intelligent system. If these distortions result from human actions and thought patterns, it is referred to as a cognitive bias. However, due to the novelty of this subject, it is not yet apparent which different cognitive biases can occur within an AI project. The aim of this paper is to provide a holistic view through a structured literature review. Our insights are processed and classified according to the Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) model, which is widely used in practice. This review reveals that human influence on an AI is present in every stage of the model’s development process and that “human-like” biases in an AI must be examined explicitly. T2 - The impact of human thinking on artificial intelligence – a structured investigation of cognitive biases KW - Menschliche Denkmuster KW - Maschinelles Lernen KW - Künstliche Intelligenz KW - Literaturanalyse KW - cognitive biases KW - machine learning KW - artificial intelligence KW - literature review Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323787 SN - 1436-3011 VL - 59 IS - 2 ER -