TY - JOUR A1 - Grund-Mueller, Nils A1 - Ruedenauer, Fabian A. A1 - Spaethe, Johannes A1 - Leonhardt, Sara D. T1 - Adding amino acids to a sucrose diet is not sufficient to support longevity of adult bumble bees JF - Insects N2 - Dietary macro-nutrients (i.e., carbohydrates, protein, and fat) are important for bee larval development and, thus, colony health and fitness. To which extent different diets (varying in macro-nutrient composition) affect adult bees and whether they can thrive on nectar as the sole amino acid source has, however, been little investigated. We investigated how diets varying in protein concentration and overall nutrient composition affected consumption, longevity, and breeding behavior of the buff-tailed bumble bee, Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Queenless micro-colonies were fed either natural nutrient sources (pollen), nearly pure protein (i.e., the milk protein casein), or sucrose solutions with low and with high essential amino acid content in concentrations as can be found in nectar. We observed micro-colonies for 110 days. We found that longevity was highest for pure pollen and lowest for pure sucrose solution and sucrose solution supplemented with amino acids in concentrations as found in the nectar of several plant species. Adding higher concentrations of amino acids to sucrose solution did only slightly increase longevity compared to sucrose alone. Consequently, sucrose solution with the applied concentrations and proportions of amino acids or other protein sources (e.g., casein) alone did not meet the nutritional needs of healthy adult bumble bees. In fact, longevity was highest and reproduction only successful in micro-colonies fed pollen. These results indicate that, in addition to carbohydrates and protein, adult bumble bees, like larvae, need further nutrients (e.g., lipids and micro-nutrients) for their well-being. An appropriate nutritional composition seemed to be best provided by floral pollen, suggesting that pollen is an essential dietary component not only for larvae but also for adult bees. KW - nutrition KW - nutrients KW - foraging KW - pollen KW - resources KW - adult bees Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-203866 SN - 2075-4450 VL - 11 IS - 4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lehenberger, Maximilian A1 - Foh, Nina A1 - Göttlein, Axel A1 - Six, Diana A1 - Biedermann, Peter H. W. T1 - Nutrient-Poor Breeding Substrates of Ambrosia Beetles Are Enriched With Biologically Important Elements JF - Frontiers in Microbiology N2 - Fungus-farming within galleries in the xylem of trees has evolved independently in at least twelve lineages of weevils (Curculionidae: Scolytinae, Platypodinae) and one lineage of ship-timber beetles (Lymexylidae). Jointly these are termed ambrosia beetles because they actively cultivate nutritional “ambrosia fungi” as their main source of food. The beetles are obligately dependent on their ambrosia fungi as they provide them a broad range of essential nutrients ensuring their survival in an extremely nutrient-poor environment. While xylem is rich in carbon (C) and hydrogen (H), various elements essential for fungal and beetle growth, such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and manganese (Mn) are extremely low in concentration. Currently it remains untested how both ambrosia beetles and their fungi meet their nutritional requirements in this habitat. Here, we aimed to determine for the first time if galleries of ambrosia beetles are generally enriched with elements that are rare in uncolonized xylem tissue and whether these nutrients are translocated to the galleries from the xylem by the fungal associates. To do so, we examined natural galleries of three ambrosia beetle species from three independently evolved farming lineages, Xyleborinus saxesenii (Scolytinae: Xyleborini), Trypodendron lineatum (Scolytinae: Xyloterini) and Elateroides dermestoides (Lymexylidae), that cultivate unrelated ambrosia fungi in the ascomycete orders Ophiostomatales, Microascales, and Saccharomycetales, respectively. Several elements, in particular Ca, N, P, K, Mg, Mn, and S, were present in high concentrations within the beetles’ galleries but available in only very low concentrations in the surrounding xylem. The concentration of elements was generally highest with X. saxesenii, followed by T. lineatum and E. dermestoides, which positively correlates with the degree of sociality and productivity of brood per gallery. We propose that the ambrosia fungal mutualists are translocating essential elements through their hyphae from the xylem to fruiting structures they form on gallery walls. Moreover, the extremely strong enrichment observed suggests recycling of these elements from the feces of the insects, where bacteria and yeasts might play a role. KW - ambrosia beetle KW - ecological stoichiometry KW - microbiome KW - nutrients KW - macro- and micro-elements KW - element translocation Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-237602 SN - 1664-302X VL - 12 ER - TY - THES A1 - Rüdenauer, Fabian T1 - Nutrition facts of pollen: nutritional quality and how it affects reception and perception in bees T1 - Nährwertinformationen von Pollen: Nährstoffzusammensetzung und wie diese sich auf Rezeption und Perzeption von Bienen auswirkt N2 - Nutrients belong to the key elements enabling life and influencing an organism’s fitness. The intake of nutrients in the right amounts and ratios can increase fitness; strong deviations from the optimal intake target can decrease fitness. Hence, the ability to assess the nutritional profile of food would benefit animals. To achieve this, they need the according nutrient receptors, the ability to interpret the receptor information via perceptive mechanisms, and the ability to adjust their foraging behavior accordingly. Additionally, eventually existing correlations between the nutrient groups and single nutrient compounds in food could help them to achieve this adjustment. A prominent interaction between food and consumer is the interaction between flowering plants (angiosperms) and animal pollinators. Usually both of the interacting partners benefit from this mutualistic interaction. Plants are pollinated while pollinators get a (most of the times) nutritional reward in form of nectar and/or pollen. As similar interactions between plants and animals seem to have existed even before the emergence of angiosperms, these interactions between insects and angiosperms very likely have co-evolved right from their evolutionary origin. Therefore, insect pollinators with the ability to assess the nutritional profile may have shaped the nutritional profile of plant species depending on them for their reproduction via selection pressure. In Chapter I of this thesis the pollen nutritional profile of many plant species was analyzed in the context of their phylogeny and their dependence on insect pollinators. In addition, correlations between the nutrients were investigated. While the impact of phylogeny on the pollen protein content was little, the mutual outcome of both of the studies included in this chapter is that protein content of pollen is mostly influenced by the plant’s dependence on insect pollinators. Several correlations found between nutrients within and between the nutrient groups could additionally help the pollinators to assess the nutrient profile of pollen. An important prerequisite for this assessment would be that the pollinators are able to differentiate between pollen of different plant species. Therefore, in Chapter II it was investigated whether bees have this ability. Specifically, it was investigated whether honeybees are able to differentiate between pollen of two different, but closely related plant species and whether bumblebees prefer one out of three pollen mixes, when they were fed with only one of them as larvae. Honeybees indeed were able to differentiate between the pollen species and bumblebees preferred one of the pollen mixes to the pollen mix they were fed as larvae, possibly due to its nutritional content. Therefore, the basis for pollen nutrient assessment is given in bees. However, there also was a slight preference for the pollen fed as larvae compared to another non-preferred pollen mix, at least hinting at the retention of larval memory in adult bumblebees. Chapter III looks into nutrient perception of bumblebees more in detail. Here it was shown that they are principally able to perceive amino acids and differentiate between them as well as different concentrations of the same amino acid. However, they do not seem to be able to assess the amino acid content in pollen or do not focus on it, but instead seem to focus on fatty acids, for which they could not only perceive concentration differences, but also were able to differentiate between. These findings were supported by feeding experiments in which the bumblebees did not prefer any of the pollen diets containing less or more amino acids but preferred pollen with less fatty acids. In no choice feeding experiments, bumblebees receiving a diet with high fatty acid content accepted undereating other nutrients instead of overeating fat, leading to increased mortality and the inability to reproduce. Hence, the importance of fat in pollen needs to be looked into further. In conclusion, this thesis shows that the co-evolution of flowering plants and pollinating insects could be even more pronounced than thought before. Insects do not only pressure the plants to produce high quality nectar, but also pressure those plants depending on insect pollination to produce high quality pollen. The reason could be the insects’ ability to receive and perceive certain nutrients, which enables them to forage selectively leading to a higher reproductive success of plants with a pollinator-suitable nutritional pollen profile. N2 - Nährstoffe gehören zu den zentralen Elementen, die das Leben an sich ermöglichen und die Fitness eines Organismus beeinflussen können. Nährstoffaufnahme in den richtigen Mengen und Verhältnissen kann die Fitness verbessern, starke Abweichungen von der optimalen Aufnahme können sie verschlechtern. Deshalb könnten Tiere von der Fähigkeit profitieren das Nährstoffprofil von Nahrung bewerten zu können. Dafür benötigten sie jedoch die passenden Nährstoffrezeptoren, die Fähigkeit die Rezeptorinformationen durch perzeptive Mechanismen zu interpretieren und ihr Sammelverhalten daran anzupassen. Eine zusätzliche Hilfe dabei könnten Korrelationen zwischen sowohl den Nährstoffgruppen als auch einzelnen Nährstoffen bieten. Eine bekannte Interaktion zwischen Nahrung und Konsument ist die zwischen Blühpflanzen (Angiospermen) und tierischen Bestäubern. Normalerweise profitieren beide Interaktionspartner von dieser mutualistischen Interaktion. Pflanzen werden bestäubt, während die Bestäuber eine (zumeist) nahrhafte Belohnung in Form von Nektar und/oder Pollen erhalten. Da ähnliche Interaktionen zwischen Pflanzen und Tieren vermutlich schon vor dem Auftreten der Angiospermen existierten, könnte sich diese Interaktion, im Speziellen mit Insekten, direkt vom evolutiven Startpunkt der Angiospermen aus koevolviert haben. Deshalb ist es möglich, dass Bestäuber mit der Fähigkeit das Nährstoffprofil von Pollen bewerten zu können, dieses bei von ihnen abhängigen Pflanzen durch Selektionsdruck formen konnten. Im Kapitel I dieser Thesis wurde das Nährstoffprofil von Pollen vieler Pflanzenarten im Kontext ihrer Phylogenie und ihrer Abhängigkeit von Insekten als Bestäubern analysiert. Außerdem wurden Korrelationen zwischen den Nährstoffen untersucht. Während die Phylogenie nur einen geringen Einfluss auf den Proteingehalt von Pollen haben könnte, ist der gemeinsame Nenner der beiden Studien in diesem Kapitel, dass der Proteingehalt des Pollens hauptsächlich von der Abhängigkeit der Pflanzen von Bestäubern bestimmt wird. Es wurden zudem einige Korrelationen sowohl in als auch zwischen den Nährstoffgruppen gefunden, die den Bestäubern helfen könnten das Nährstoffprofil von Pollen bewerten zu können. Eine wichtige Grundvoraussetzung für diese Bewertung wäre, dass die Bestäuber überhaupt dazu in der Lage sind zwischen Pollen von unterschiedlichen Pflanzenarten zu unterscheiden. Dies wird in Kapitel II behandelt, in dem untersucht wurde ob Honigbienen in der Lage sind zwischen Pollen zweier nah verwandter Pflanzenarten zu unterscheiden und ob Hummeln eine von drei Pollenmischungen bevorzugen, wenn sie nur mit einer davon als Larve in Kontakt kamen. Honigbienen war es tatsächlich möglich zwischen den Pollenarten zu unterscheiden und Hummeln bevorzugten eine bestimmte Pollenmischung gegenüber der, die sie als Larve erhalten hatten, möglicherweise aufgrund eines vorteilhaften Nährstoffprofils. Die Grundlage zur Nährstoffbewertung scheint bei Bienen also gegeben zu sein. Allerdings hatten die Hummeln auch eine leichte Präferenz für die Pollenmischung, die sie als Larve erhalten hatten gegenüber der dritten, nicht bevorzugten Pollenmischung, was zumindest darauf hindeuten könnte, dass Larvenerinnerungen bei erwachsenen Hummeln erhalten bleiben könnten. Kapitel III beschäftigt sich tiefergehend mit der Nährstoffwahrnehmung von Hummeln. Es wurde gezeigt, dass diese prinzipiell befähigt sind Aminosäuren wahrzunehmen als auch zwischen ihnen und verschiedenen Konzentrationen der gleichen Aminosäure zu unterscheiden. Allerdings scheinen sie entweder nicht in der Lage zu sein oder sich zumindest nicht darauf zu fokussieren den Aminosäuregehalt von Pollen zu bewerten, sondern sich eher auf Fettsäuren zu konzentrieren. Von diesen konnten sie nicht nur Konzentrationsunterschiede feststellen, sondern auch zwischen verschiedenen Fettsäuren im Pollen unterscheiden. Diese Ergebnisse wurden von denen in Fütterungsexperimenten gestützt, in denen die Hummeln gleiche Mengen von Pollen mit mehr oder weniger Aminosäuren aufnahmen, aber Pollen mit weniger Fettsäuren bevorzugten. In Experimenten, in denen die Hummeln keine Wahl hatten, nahmen die Hummeln mit einer Diät, die eine hohe Fettsäurekonzentration hatte, lieber in Kauf, dass sie zu wenig von den anderen Nährstoffen aufnahmen, als zu viel Fett, was zu einer erhöhten Mortalitätsrate und der Unfähigkeit sich zu reproduzieren führte. Deshalb sollten zukünftige Studien sich eingehender mit dem Fettsäuregehalt von Pollen beschäftigen. Zusammenfassend zeigt diese Thesis, dass die Koevolution von Pflanzen und bestäubenden Insekten ausgeprägter sein könnte, als bisher angenommen. Insekten setzen die Pflanzen nicht nur unter Druck qualitativ hochwertigen Nektar zu produzieren, sondern setzen vor allem auch die Pflanzen unter Druck, die von ihrer Bestäubung abhängig sind, qualitativ hochwertigen Pollen zu produzieren. Der Grund dafür könnte die Fähigkeit der Insekten sein, bestimmte Nährstoffe zu rezipieren und perzipieren und dann ihr Sammelverhalten so anzupassen, dass Pflanzen mit einem passenden Nährstoffprofil einen höheren Reproduktionserfolg haben. KW - Pollen KW - bumblebee*s KW - nutrients KW - nutrition KW - pollen KW - reception KW - perception KW - proboscis extension response KW - honeybee*s Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-212548 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Ruedenauer, Fabian A. A1 - Wöhrle, Christine A1 - Spaethe, Johannes A1 - Leonhardt, Sara D. T1 - Do honeybees (Apis mellifera) differentiate between different pollen types? JF - PLoS ONE N2 - Bees receive nectar and pollen as reward for pollinating plants. Pollen of different plant species varies widely in nutritional composition. In order to select pollen of appropriate nutritional quality, bees would benefit if they could distinguish different pollen types. Whether they rely on visual, olfactory and/or chemotactile cues to distinguish between different pollen types, has however been little studied. In this study, we examined whether and how Apis mellifera workers differentiate between almond and apple pollen. We used differential proboscis extension response conditioning with olfactory and chemotactile stimulation, in light and darkness, and in summer and winter bees. We found that honeybees were only able to differentiate between different pollen types, when they could use both chemotactile and olfactory cues. Visual cues further improved learning performance. Summer bees learned faster than winter bees. Our results thus highlight the importance of multisensory information for pollen discrimination. KW - pollen KW - bees KW - honey bees KW - conditioned response KW - behavioral conditioning KW - foraging KW - nutrients KW - sensory cues Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177537 VL - 13 IS - 11 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Amich, Jorge A1 - Krappmann, Sven T1 - Deciphering metabolic traits of the fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus: redundancy vs. essentiality JF - Frontiers in Microbiology N2 - Incidence rates of infections caused by environmental opportunistic fungi have risen over recent decades. Aspergillus species have emerged as serious threat for the immunecompromised, and detailed knowledge about virulence-determining traits is crucial for drug target identification. As a prime saprobe, A. fumigatus has evolved to efficiently adapt to various stresses and to sustain nutritional supply by osmotrophy, which is characterized by extracellular substrate digestion followed by efficient uptake of breakdown products that are then fed into the fungal primary metabolism. These intrinsic metabolic features are believed to be related with its virulence ability. The plethora of genes that encode underlying effectors has hampered their in-depth analysis with respect to pathogenesis. Recent developments in Aspergillus molecular biology allow conditional gene expression or comprehensive targeting of gene families to cope with redundancy. Furthermore, identification of essential genes that are intrinsically connected to virulence opens accurate perspectives for novel targets in antifungal therapy. KW - Aspergillus fumigatus KW - aspergillosis KW - virulence KW - conditional promoter replacement KW - nutrients KW - gene family targeting Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-123669 VL - 3 ER -