TY - JOUR A1 - Kohlhase, Sandra A1 - Bogdanova, Natalia V. A1 - Schürmann, Peter A1 - Bermisheva, Marina A1 - Khusnutdinova, Elza A1 - Antonenkova, Natalia A1 - Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won A1 - Hillemanns, Peter A1 - Meyer, Andreas A1 - Christiansen, Hans A1 - Schindler, Detlev A1 - Dörk, Thilo T1 - Mutation Analysis of the ERCC4/FANCQ Gene in Hereditary Breast Cancer JF - PLOS ONE N2 - The ERCC4 protein forms a structure-specific endonuclease involved in the DNA damage response. Different cancer syndromes such as a subtype of Xeroderma pigmentosum, XPF, and recently a subtype of Fanconi Anemia, FA-Q, have been attributed to biallelic ERCC4 gene mutations. To investigate whether monoallelic ERCC4 gene defects play some role in the inherited component of breast cancer susceptibility, we sequenced the whole ERCC4 coding region and flanking untranslated portions in a series of 101 Byelorussian and German breast cancer patients selected for familial disease (set 1, n = 63) or for the presence of the rs1800067 risk haplotype (set 2, n = 38). This study confirmed six known and one novel exonic variants, including four missense substitutions but no truncating mutation. Missense substitution p.R415Q (rs1800067), a previously postulated breast cancer susceptibility allele, was subsequently screened for in a total of 3,698 breast cancer cases and 2,868 controls from Germany, Belarus or Russia. The Gln415 allele appeared protective against breast cancer in the German series, with the strongest effect for ductal histology (OR 0.67; 95%CI 0.49; 0.92; p = 0.003), but this association was not confirmed in the other two series, with the combined analysis yielding an overall Mantel-Haenszel OR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.81; 1.08). There was no significant effect of p.R415Q on breast cancer survival in the German patient series. The other three detected ERCC4 missense mutations included two known rare variants as well as a novel substitution, p.E17V, that we identified on a p.R415Q haplotype background. The p.E17V mutation is predicted to be probably damaging but was present in just one heterozygous patient. We conclude that the contribution of ERCC4/FANCQ coding mutations to hereditary breast cancer in Central and Eastern Europe is likely to be small. KW - ERCC1-XPF KW - susceptibility loci KW - ERCC4 KW - genome-wide association KW - fanconi-anemia KW - ATM gene KW - endonuclease KW - risk KW - requency KW - variants Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117582 VL - 9 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Harter, Philipp A1 - Hauke, Jan A1 - Heitz, Florian A1 - Reuss, Alexander A1 - Kommoss, Stefan A1 - Marmé, Frederik A1 - Heimbach, André A1 - Prieske, Katharina A1 - Richters, Lisa A1 - Burges, Alexander A1 - Neidhardt, Guido A1 - de Gregorio, Nikolaus A1 - El-Balat, Ahmed A1 - Hilpert, Felix A1 - Meier, Werner A1 - Kimmig, Rainer A1 - Kast, Karin A1 - Sehouli, Jalid A1 - Baumann, Klaus A1 - Jackisch, Christian A1 - Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won A1 - Hanker, Lars A1 - Kröber, Sandra A1 - Pfisterer, Jacobus A1 - Gevensleben, Heidrun A1 - Schnelzer, Andreas A1 - Dietrich, Dimo A1 - Neunhöffer, Tanja A1 - Krockenberger, Mathias A1 - Brucker, Sara Y. A1 - Nürnberg, Peter A1 - Thiele, Holger A1 - Altmüller, Janine A1 - Lamla, Josefin A1 - Elser, Gabriele A1 - du Bois, Andreas A1 - Hahnen, Eric A1 - Schmutzler, Rita T1 - Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including \(BRCA1/2\) in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1) JF - PLoS ONE N2 - Background Identification of families at risk for ovarian cancer offers the opportunity to consider prophylactic surgery thus reducing ovarian cancer mortality. So far, identification of potentially affected families in Germany was solely performed via family history and numbers of affected family members with breast or ovarian cancer. However, neither the prevalence of deleterious variants in \(BRCA1/2\) in ovarian cancer in Germany nor the reliability of family history as trigger for genetic counselling has ever been evaluated. Methods Prospective counseling and germline testing of consecutive patients with primary diagnosis or with platinum-sensitive relapse of an invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Testing included 25 candidate and established risk genes. Among these 25 genes, 16 genes (\(ATM\), \(BRCA1\), \(BRCA2\), \(CDH1\), \(CHEK2\), \(MLH1\), \(MSH2\), \(MSH6\), \(NBN\), \(PMS2\), \(PTEN\), \(PALB2\), \(RAD51C\), \(RAD51D\), \(STK11\), \(TP53\)) were defined as established cancer risk genes. A positive family history was defined as at least one relative with breast cancer or ovarian cancer or breast cancer in personal history. Results In total, we analyzed 523 patients: 281 patients with primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 242 patients with relapsed disease. Median age at primary diagnosis was 58 years (range 16–93) and 406 patients (77.6%) had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In total, 27.9% of the patients showed at least one deleterious variant in all 25 investigated genes and 26.4% in the defined 16 risk genes. Deleterious variants were most prevalent in the \(BRCA1\) (15.5%), \(BRCA2\) (5.5%), \(RAD51C\) (2.5%) and \(PALB2\) (1.1%) genes. The prevalence of deleterious variants did not differ significantly between patients at primary diagnosis and relapse. The prevalence of deleterious variants in \(BRCA1/2\) (and in all 16 risk genes) in patients <60 years was 30.2% (33.2%) versus 10.6% (18.9%) in patients \(\geq\)60 years. Family history was positive in 43% of all patients. Patients with a positive family history had a prevalence of deleterious variants of 31.6% (36.0%) versus 11.4% (17.6%) and histologic subtype of high grade serous ovarian cancer versus other showed a prevalence of deleterious variants of 23.2% (29.1%) and 10.2% (14.8%), respectively. Testing only for \(BRCA1/2\) would miss in our series more than 5% of the patients with a deleterious variant in established risk genes. Conclusions 26.4% of all patients harbor at least one deleterious variant in established risk genes. The threshold of 10% mutation rate which is accepted for reimbursement by health care providers in Germany was observed in all subgroups analyzed and neither age at primary diagnosis nor histo-type or family history sufficiently enough could identify a subgroup not eligible for genetic counselling and testing. Genetic testing should therefore be offered to every patient with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and limiting testing to \(BRCA1/2\) seems to be not sufficient. KW - medicine KW - Genetic causes of cancer KW - ovarian cancer KW - cancer risk factors KW - histology KW - cancer detection and diagnosis KW - breast cancer KW - genetic testing KW - human genetics Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-173553 VL - 12 IS - 10 ER -