TY - JOUR A1 - Rinn, Robin A1 - Ludwig, Jonas A1 - Fassler, Pauline A1 - Deutsch, Roland T1 - Cues of wealth and the subjective perception of rich people JF - Current Psychology N2 - These pre-registered studies shed light on the cues that individuals use to identify rich people. In two studies (N = 598), we first developed a factor-analytical model that describes the content and the mental structure of 24 wealth cues. A third within-subject study (N = 89) then assessed the perception of rich subgroups based on this model of wealth cues. Participants evaluated the extent to which the wealth cues applied to two distinct subgroups of rich people. The results show: German and US-American participants think that one can identify rich people based on the same set of cues which can be grouped along the following dimensions: luxury consumption, expensive hobbies, spontaneous spending, greedy behavior, charismatic behavior, self-presentation, and specific possessions. However, Germans and US-Americans relied on these cues to different degrees to diagnose wealth in others. Moreover, we found evidence for subgroup-specific wealth cue profiles insofar as target individuals who acquired their wealth via internal (e.g., hard work) compared to external means (e.g., lottery winners) were evaluated differently on these wealth cues, presumably because of their perceived differences in valence and competence. Together, this research provides new insights in the cognitive representation of the latent construct of wealth. Practical implications for research on the perception of affluence, and implications for political decision makers, are discussed in the last section. KW - impression formation KW - the rich KW - subjective wealth cues KW - judgement KW - implications of wealth Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324922 SN - 1046-1310 VL - 42 IS - 31 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rinn, Robin A1 - Krishna, Anand A1 - Deutsch, Roland T1 - The psychology of income wealth threshold estimations: A registered report JF - British Journal of Social Psychology N2 - How do people estimate the income that is needed to be rich? Two correlative survey studies (Study 1 and 2, N = 568) and one registered experimental study (Study 3, N = 500) examined the cognitive mechanisms that are used to derive an answer to this question. We tested whether individuals use their personal income (PI) as a self‐generated anchor to derive an estimate of the income needed to be rich (= income wealth threshold estimation, IWTE). On a bivariate level, we found the expected positive relationship between one's PI and IWTE and, in line with previous findings, we found that people do not consider themselves rich. Furthermore, we predicted that individuals additionally use information about their social status within their social circles to make an IWTE. The findings from study 2 support this notion and show that only self‐reported high‐income individuals show different IWTEs depending on relative social status: Individuals in this group who self‐reported a high status produced higher IWTEs than individuals who self‐reported low status. The registered experimental study could not replicate this pattern robustly, although the results trended non‐significantly in the same direction. Together, the findings revealed that the income of individuals as well as the social environment are used as sources of information to make IWTE judgements, although they are likely not the only important predictors. KW - affluence KW - anchoring KW - heuristics KW - income wealth threshold estimations KW - social comparisons KW - subjective perception of wealth KW - the rich KW - wealth estimation Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-311847 VL - 62 IS - 1 SP - 630 EP - 650 ER - TY - THES A1 - Rinn, Robin T1 - The Subjective Construction of Wealth and the Perception of Wealthy People. The Role of the Social Sample, Social Comparisons, and Mental Representations T1 - Die subjektive Konstruktion von Reichtum und die Wahrnehmung wohlhabender Personen. Die Rolle der sozialen Stichprobe, sozialer Vergleiche und mentaler Repräsentationen N2 - Although the concept of wealth is a topic that ancient philosophers have dealt with, relatively little attention is paid to it in psychology. This work sheds light on cognitive processes on how individuals derive a judgment about whether someone is rich and whether certain cues serve as subjective indicators of wealth. Based on three chapters that describe K = 11 observational and experimental studies (N = 2,315), three research questions shall be answered: First, to what extent do individuals differ when defining wealth? Secondly, are there universal cues of wealth that individuals use to identify rich people? And if yes, in what sense do these cues depend on the situation or context? Furthermore, it will be asked whether there are situational boundaries under which those cues do not apply. The present research shows that individuals differ in defining wealth and that they take their personal life circumstances and situational cues into account to define wealth. Moreover, evidence for a coherent wealth cue model was found that describes cues that are used by individuals to identify the rich (i.e., particularly wealthy people), whereby the validity of these cues depends on several contextual (e.g., cultural) factors. Lastly, it was found that by isolating individual wealth cues and looking at core mental representations of these cues, they may not be perceived as indicative for rich people anymore. The conclusions reported here set a foundation for further research on the perceptions of wealth which may be particularly relevant for the political discourse N2 - Obwohl „Reichtum“ ein Thema ist, mit dem sich schon die Philosophen der Antike beschäftigt haben, wird ihm in der Psychologie relativ wenig Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt. Diese Arbeit beleuchtet die kognitiven Prozesse, wie Individuen ein Urteil darüber fällen, ob jemand reich ist, und ob bestimmte Anhaltspunkte als subjektive Indikatoren für Reichtum dienen. In drei Kapiteln, die k = 11 Beobachtungs- und experimentelle Studien (N = 2.315) beschreiben, sollen drei Forschungsfragen beantwortet werden. Erstens: Inwieweit unterscheiden sich Individuen, wenn sie Reichtum definieren sollen? Zweitens: Gibt es universelle Hinweisreize für Reichtum, die Individuen verwenden, um reiche Menschen zu identifizieren? Und wenn ja, inwieweit sind diese Hinweisreize kontextabhängig? Darüber hinaus wird die Frage beantwortet, ob es situative Grenzen gibt, unter denen diese Hinweisreize nicht gelten. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass sich Individuen bei der Definition von Reichtum inter-individuell unterscheiden und dass Personen bei der Definition von Reichtum ihre Lebensumstände und situativ verfügbare Anhaltspunkte in Betracht ziehen. Darüber hinaus wurden Belege für ein kohärentes Modell von Reichtumshinweisen gefunden, das Hinweisreize beschreibt, die von Individuen verwendet werden, um reiche Personen (d.h. besonders wohlhabende Menschen) zu identifizieren, wobei die Gültigkeit dieser Merkmale von verschiedenen kontextuellen (z.B. kulturellen) Faktoren abhängt. Schließlich wurde festgestellt, dass durch die Isolierung einzelner Reichtumshinweise der mentalen Repräsentation dieser Merkmale diese möglicherweise nicht mehr als Indikator für reiche Menschen wahrgenommen werden. Aus den Schlussfolgerungen ergeben sich Grundlagen für weitere Forschungen über die Wahrnehmung von Reichtum, die insbesondere für den politischen Diskurs von Bedeutung sein können KW - Milieu KW - Kultur KW - Repräsentation KW - Social Circle KW - Mental Representations KW - Soziales Umfeld KW - Wahrgenommener Reichtum KW - Perceived Wealth KW - Referenzrahmen Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-327894 ER -