TY  - THES
A1  - Bauer, Andreas Ludwig
T1  - Evaluation des Einflusses sagitaler Weichteilparameter hinsichtlich der Attraktivität des Weichteilprofils
T1  - Evaluation of the influence of soft tissue parameters regarding the attractiveness of the soft tissue profile
N2  - Viele der in der kieferorthopädischen Therapie verwendeten Messwerte stammen aus methodisch zumindest fragwürdigen Quellen. Um diese Werte zu überprüfen und den Einfluss einzelner Weichteilparameter auf die Attraktivität des Gesichtsprofils zu untersuchen, wurden von einem Durchschnittsgesicht in der Saggitalen verschiedene Variationen erstellt, wobei pro Bilderreihe jeweils nur ein Parameter verändert wurde. Zu untersuchende Parameter waren: Die Profiltypen nach AM Schwarz, das Gesichtshöhenverhältnis nach Kollman, Holdawaywinkel, Z-Winkel (Merrifield), Nasofacialwinkel, Nasolabialwinkel (obere und untere Komponente) sowie die Nasenlänge. Die Bilderserien wurden von Probanden hinsichtlich der Attraktivität bewertet und eine statistische Auswertung erstellt. Dabei wurden die nach hinten schiefen Gesichter deutlich besser bewertet als die geraden und nach vorne schiefen Profilverläufe. Ein über die untere Komponente verkleinerter Nasolabialwinkel wurde am besten bewertet. Ein flacheres Lippenprofil wurde im Holdaway- und Z-Winkel tendenziell besser bewertet.
N2  - Many of the values used in orthodontic therapy derived from at least methodologically questionable sources. To check the current value of these parameters and to examine the influence of individual parameters on the soft tissue facial profile attractiveness, several variations have been created by an average face in the sagittal, whereby in a series of images, only one parameter was changed. Parameters to be examined were: The profile types according to AM Schwarz, the facial height ratio (Kollman), Holdaway’s angle, Z-angle (Merrifield), nasofacial angle, nasolabial angle (upper and lower component) and the nose length. The series of images were evaluated by subjects in terms of attractiveness and a statistical analysis was carried out. The leaning back faces were rated significantly better than the straight and forward profile curves. A Nasolabial angle reduced by the lower component (lips) was rated best. A flatter lip profile (Holdaway- and Z–angle) tends to be rated better.
KW  - Attraktivität
KW  - Profil
KW  - Gesicht
KW  - Nase
KW  - Lippen
KW  - soft tissue profile
Y1  - 2014
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-106591
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Farmer, Adam D.
A1  - Strzelczyk, Adam
A1  - Finisguerra, Alessandra
A1  - Gourine, Alexander V.
A1  - Gharabaghi, Alireza
A1  - Hasan, Alkomiet
A1  - Burger, Andreas M.
A1  - Jaramillo, Andrés M.
A1  - Mertens, Ann
A1  - Majid, Arshad
A1  - Verkuil, Bart
A1  - Badran, Bashar W.
A1  - Ventura-Bort, Carlos
A1  - Gaul, Charly
A1  - Beste, Christian
A1  - Warren, Christopher M.
A1  - Quintana, Daniel S.
A1  - Hämmerer, Dorothea
A1  - Freri, Elena
A1  - Frangos, Eleni
A1  - Tobaldini, Eleonora
A1  - Kaniusas, Eugenijus
A1  - Rosenow, Felix
A1  - Capone, Fioravante
A1  - Panetsos, Fivos
A1  - Ackland, Gareth L.
A1  - Kaithwas, Gaurav
A1  - O'Leary, Georgia H.
A1  - Genheimer, Hannah
A1  - Jacobs, Heidi I. L.
A1  - Van Diest, Ilse
A1  - Schoenen, Jean
A1  - Redgrave, Jessica
A1  - Fang, Jiliang
A1  - Deuchars, Jim
A1  - Széles, Jozsef C.
A1  - Thayer, Julian F.
A1  - More, Kaushik
A1  - Vonck, Kristl
A1  - Steenbergen, Laura
A1  - Vianna, Lauro C.
A1  - McTeague, Lisa M.
A1  - Ludwig, Mareike
A1  - Veldhuizen, Maria G.
A1  - De Couck, Marijke
A1  - Casazza, Marina
A1  - Keute, Marius
A1  - Bikson, Marom
A1  - Andreatta, Marta
A1  - D'Agostini, Martina
A1  - Weymar, Mathias
A1  - Betts, Matthew
A1  - Prigge, Matthias
A1  - Kaess, Michael
A1  - Roden, Michael
A1  - Thai, Michelle
A1  - Schuster, Nathaniel M.
A1  - Montano, Nicola
A1  - Hansen, Niels
A1  - Kroemer, Nils B.
A1  - Rong, Peijing
A1  - Fischer, Rico
A1  - Howland, Robert H.
A1  - Sclocco, Roberta
A1  - Sellaro, Roberta
A1  - Garcia, Ronald G.
A1  - Bauer, Sebastian
A1  - Gancheva, Sofiya
A1  - Stavrakis, Stavros
A1  - Kampusch, Stefan
A1  - Deuchars, Susan A.
A1  - Wehner, Sven
A1  - Laborde, Sylvain
A1  - Usichenko, Taras
A1  - Polak, Thomas
A1  - Zaehle, Tino
A1  - Borges, Uirassu
A1  - Teckentrup, Vanessa
A1  - Jandackova, Vera K.
A1  - Napadow, Vitaly
A1  - Koenig, Julian
T1  - International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020)
JF  - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
N2  - Given its non-invasive nature, there is increasing interest in the use of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) across basic, translational and clinical research. Contemporaneously, tVNS can be achieved by stimulating either the auricular branch or the cervical bundle of the vagus nerve, referred to as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation(VNS) and transcutaneous cervical VNS, respectively. In order to advance the field in a systematic manner, studies using these technologies need to adequately report sufficient methodological detail to enable comparison of results between studies, replication of studies, as well as enhancing study participant safety. We systematically reviewed the existing tVNS literature to evaluate current reporting practices. Based on this review, and consensus among participating authors, we propose a set of minimal reporting items to guide future tVNS studies. The suggested items address specific technical aspects of the device and stimulation parameters. We also cover general recommendations including inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants, outcome parameters and the detailed reporting of side effects. Furthermore, we review strategies used to identify the optimal stimulation parameters for a given research setting and summarize ongoing developments in animal research with potential implications for the application of tVNS in humans. Finally, we discuss the potential of tVNS in future research as well as the associated challenges across several disciplines in research and clinical practice.
KW  - transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation
KW  - minimum reporting standards
KW  - guidelines & recommendations
KW  - transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation
KW  - transcutaneous cervical vagus nerve stimulation
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234346
SN  - 1662-5161
VL  - 14
ER  -