TY - JOUR A1 - Brand, Markus A1 - Reimer, Stanislaus A1 - Reibetanz, Joachim A1 - Flemming, Sven A1 - Kornmann, Marko A1 - Meining, Alexander T1 - Endoscopic full thickness resection vs. transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors - a retrospective analysis JF - International Journal of Colorectal Disease N2 - Purpose Local treatment of small well-differentiated rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is recommended by current guidelines. However, although several endoscopic methods have been established, the highest R0 rate is achieved by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Since a recently published study about endoscopic full thickness resection (eFTR) showed a R0 resection rate of 100%, the aim of this study was to evaluate both methods (eFTR vs. TEM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed all patients with rectal NET treated either by TEM (1999–2018) or eFTR (2016–2019) in two tertiary centers (University Hospital Wuerzburg and Ulm). We analyzed clinical, procedural, and histopathological outcomes in both groups. Results Twenty-eight patients with rectal NET received local treatment (TEM: 13; eFTR: 15). Most tumors were at stage T1a and grade G1 or G2 (in the TEM group two G3 NETs were staged T2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy). In both groups, similar outcomes for en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, tumor size, or specimen size were found. No procedural adverse events were noted. Mean procedure time in the TEM group was 48.9 min and 19.2 min in the eFTR group. Conclusion eFTR is a convincing method for local treatment of small rectal NETs combining high safety and efficacy with short interventional time. KW - rectum KW - neuroendocrine tumor (NET) KW - transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) KW - endoscopic full thickness resection (eFTR) KW - full-thickness resection device (FTRD) Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234833 SN - 0179-1958 VL - 36 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kelm, Matthias A1 - Reibetanz, Joachim A1 - Kim, Mia A1 - Schoettker, Kathrin A1 - Brand, Markus A1 - Meining, Alexander A1 - Germer, Christoph-Thomas A1 - Flemming, Sven T1 - Kono-S anastomosis in Crohn’s disease: A retrospective study on postoperative morbidity and disease recurrence in comparison to the conventional side-to-side anastomosis JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine N2 - Introduction: The rates of postoperative recurrence following ileocecal resection due to Crohn’s disease remain highly relevant. Despite this fact, while the Kono-S anastomosis technique initially demonstrated promising results, robust evidence is still lacking. This study aimed to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of the Kono-S versus side-to-side anastomosis. Methods: A retrospective single-center study was performed including all patients who received an ileocecal resection between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2021 at the Department of Surgery at the University Hospital of Wuerzburg. Patients who underwent conventional a side-to-side anastomosis were compared to those who received a Kono-S anastomosis. The short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed for all patients. Results: Here, 29 patients who underwent a conventional side-to-side anastomosis and 22 patients who underwent a Kono-S anastomosis were included. No differences were observed regarding short-term postoperative outcomes. The disease recurrence rate postoperatively was numerically lower following the Kono-S anastomosis (median Rutgeert score of 1.7 versus 2.5), with a relevantly increased rate of patients in remission (17.2% versus 31.8%); however, neither of these results reached statistical significance. Conclusion: The Kono-S anastomosis method is safe and feasible and potentially decreases the severity of postoperative disease remission. KW - Crohn’s disease KW - surgical therapy KW - ileocecal resection KW - Kono-S anastomosis Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-297334 SN - 2077-0383 VL - 11 IS - 23 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Reibetanz, Joachim A1 - Kelm, Matthias A1 - Uttinger, Konstantin L. A1 - Reuter, Miriam A1 - Schlegel, Nicolas A1 - Hankir, Mohamed A1 - Wiegering, Verena A1 - Germer, Christoph-Thomas A1 - Fassnacht, Martin A1 - Lock, Johan Friso A1 - Wiegering, Armin T1 - Differences in morbidity and mortality between unilateral adrenalectomy for adrenal Cushing’s syndrome and bilateral adrenalectomy for therapy refractory extra-adrenal Cushing’s syndrome JF - Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery N2 - Purpose In selected cases of severe Cushing’s syndrome due to uncontrolled ACTH secretion, bilateral adrenalectomy appears unavoidable. Compared with unilateral adrenalectomy (for adrenal Cushing’s syndrome), bilateral adrenalectomy has a perceived higher perioperative morbidity. The aim of the current study was to compare both interventions in endogenous Cushing’s syndrome regarding postoperative outcomes. Methods We report a single-center, retrospective cohort study comparing patients with hypercortisolism undergoing bilateral vs. unilateral adrenalectomy during 2008–2021. Patients with adrenal Cushing’s syndrome due to adenoma were compared with patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome (Cushing’s disease and ectopic ACTH production) focusing on postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as long-term survival. Results Of 83 patients with adrenalectomy for hypercortisolism (65.1% female, median age 53 years), the indication for adrenalectomy was due to adrenal Cushing’s syndrome in 60 patients (72.2%; 59 unilateral and one bilateral), and due to hypercortisolism caused by Cushing’s disease (n = 16) or non-pituitary uncontrolled ACTH secretion of unknown origin (n = 7) (27.7% of all adrenalectomies). Compared with unilateral adrenalectomy (n = 59), patients with bilateral adrenalectomy (n = 24) had a higher rate of severe complications (0% vs. 33%; p < 0.001) and delayed recovery (median: 10.2% vs. 79.2%; p < 0.001). Using the MTL30 marker, patients with bilateral adrenalectomy fared worse than patients after unilateral surgery (MTL30 positive: 7.2% vs. 25.0% p < 0.001). Postoperative mortality was increased in patients with bilateral adrenalectomy (0% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.081). Conclusion While unilateral adrenalectomy for adrenal Cushing’s syndrome represents a safe and definitive therapeutic option, bilateral adrenalectomy to control ACTH-dependent extra-adrenal Cushing’s syndrome or Cushing’s disease is a more complicated intervention with a mortality of nearly 10%. KW - Cushing KW - adrenal surgery KW - MTL30 KW - complication Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323947 VL - 407 IS - 6 ER -