TY - JOUR A1 - Weber, Patrick A1 - Beck, Melina A1 - Klug, Michael A1 - Klug, Andreas A1 - Klug, Alexander A1 - Glowalla, Claudio A1 - Gollwitzer, Hans T1 - Survival of patient-specific unicondylar knee replacement JF - Journal of Personalized Medicine N2 - Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in isolated medial or lateral osteoarthritis leads to good clinical results. However, revision rates are higher in comparison to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One reason is suboptimal fitting of conventional off-the-shelf prostheses, and major overhang of the tibial component over the bone has been reported in up to 20% of cases. In this retrospective study, a total of 537 patient-specific UKAs (507 medial prostheses and 30 lateral prostheses) that had been implanted in 3 centers over a period of 10 years were analyzed for survival, with a minimal follow-up of 1 year (range 12 to 129 months). Furthermore, fitting of the UKAs was analyzed on postoperative X-rays, and tibial overhang was quantified. A total of 512 prostheses were available for follow-up (95.3%). Overall survival rate (medial and lateral) of the prostheses after 5 years was 96%. The 30 lateral UKAs showed a survival rate of 100% at 5 years. The tibial overhang of the prosthesis was smaller than 1 mm in 99% of cases. In comparison to the reported results in the literature, our data suggest that the patient-specific implant design used in this study is associated with an excellent midterm survival rate, particularly in the lateral knee compartment, and confirms excellent fitting. KW - unicompartmental knee arthroplasty KW - osteoarthritis KW - patient-specific implant KW - partial knee arthroplasty KW - patient-specific instruments Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-313650 SN - 2075-4426 VL - 13 IS - 4 ER - TY - THES A1 - Klug, Alexander T1 - Biomechanische und zellbiologische Untersuchung zu augmentierten Biomaterial-basierten Kreuzbandkonstrukten T1 - Mechanical and cell-biological properties of crosslinked kollagen scaffolds for acl reconstruction N2 - Aktueller Goldstandard bei der Rekonstruktion des ACL des Menschen sind au-tologe Transplantate. Diese sind allerdings je nach Entnahmeort mit einer mehr oder weniger hohen Entnahmemorbidität und dem Risiko für Folgeerkrankungen verbunden. Um dies zu umgehen, wurde ein xenogenes Kollagenimplantat aus Kollagen-I-Fasern von Ratten entwickelt und das native Konstrukt bereits in einer Vorläuferstudie getestet. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wurden diese Kreuzbandkonstrukte mit Hilfe diverser Crosslinker modifiziert und hinsichtlich ihrer Biomechanik, Biokompatibilität und ihres in-vivo Verhaltens untersucht. Bewusst wurde dabei auf die Zellbesiedlung dieser Konstrukte verzichtet, da un-ter Berücksichtigung wirtschaftlicher Gesichtspunkte eines späteren humanen Einsatzes hierfür eine Arzneimittelzulassung notwendig gewesen wäre. Mit Hilfe der Crosslinker wurde versucht, die mechanische Stabilität sowie die Resistenz gegen kollagenabbauende Enzyme der Synovia zu erhöhen, um die Gefahr post-operativer Instabilitäten zu verringern. Dabei sollten Fragen bezüglich Immun-antwort, Biokompatibilität sowie Biodegradierbarkeit genau berücksichtigt wer-den. Als Crosslinker wurden für einen Vergleich in vitro neben 0,5 % Genipin auch 10 % HMDI sowie Glukose und EDC/NHS herangezogen. Dabei zeigten die Genipin-gecrosslinkten Einzelfasern die größte Reißfestigkeits-zunahme, wohingegen auf Minikonstruktbasis 10 % HMDI zu den höchsten UTS-Werten führte. Ebenso ließen sich bezüglich der Biokompatibilutät in vitro bei den Crosslinkern 0,5 % Genipin und 10 % HMDI Vorteile gegenüber den beiden an-deren erkennen. Schließlich erfolgte im Rahmen eines Tierversuchs an 16 Minipigs der Einbau von 0,5 % Genipin-gecrosslinkten Konstrukten als Kreuzbandersatz und an-schließend die biomechanische Testung sowie nach Paraffineinbettung auch eine durchlichtmikrokopische deskriptive Auswertung der Transplantate. Während nach 6 Wochen eine deutliche Reißfestigkeitsabnahme zu verzeichnen war, erreichte diese nach 6 Monaten wieder fast 60 % ihrer ursprünglichen UTS. Somit konnte ein Remodeling des eingesetzten Implantats angenommen wer-den. Dies bestätigte sich in der durchgeführten histologischen Untersuchung. Hier war das Implantat deutlich vaskularisiert, von zahlreichen Fibroblasten durchsetzt und wies eine synoviale Deckschicht auf. Allerdings scheint vor allem wegen der Schwäche der Konstrukte nach 6 Wochen sowie den vermutlich auf-grund des Crosslinkers auftretenden Reaktionserscheinungen innerhalb des Kniegelenks ein Einsatz im humanen Bereich zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt noch nicht ausgereift. Dennoch lässt sich gerade anhand des stattfindenden Remodelings das große Potential kollagenbasierter Materialien für den Kreuzbandersatz erkennen. Eine weitere Optimierung des bestehenden Konstrukts sollte deshalb forciert werden. N2 - We developed an ACL-scaffold consisting of crosslinked preformed rat collagen fibres. In this study we examined the influence of several crosslinking substances on the mechanical and cell-biological properties of this scaffold in vitro as well as in vivo as part of a minipig model. The results were promising thus more studies have to be made before an use for humans can be recommended. KW - Tissue Engineering KW - Kreuzband Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-142379 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schoffer, Olaf A1 - Schülein, Stefanie A1 - Arand, Gerlinde A1 - Arnholdt, Hans A1 - Baaske, Dieter A1 - Bargou, Ralf C. A1 - Becker, Nikolaus A1 - Beckmann, Matthias W. A1 - Bodack, Yves A1 - Böhme, Beatrix A1 - Bozkurt, Tayfun A1 - Breitsprecher, Regine A1 - Buchali, Andre A1 - Burger, Elke A1 - Burger, Ulrike A1 - Dommisch, Klaus A1 - Elsner, Gudrun A1 - Fernschild, Karin A1 - Flintzer, Ulrike A1 - Funke, Uwe A1 - Gerken, Michael A1 - Göbel, Hubert A1 - Grobe, Norbert A1 - Gumpp, Vera A1 - Heinzerling, Lucie A1 - Kempfer, Lana Raffaela A1 - Kiani, Alexander A1 - Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika A1 - Klöcking, Sabine A1 - Kreibich, Ute A1 - Knabner, Katrin A1 - Kuhn, Peter A1 - Lutze, Stine A1 - Mäder, Uwe A1 - Maisel, Tanja A1 - Maschke, Jan A1 - Middeke, Martin A1 - Neubauer, Andreas A1 - Niedostatek, Antje A1 - Opazo-Saez, Anabelle A1 - Peters, Christoph A1 - Schell, Beatrice A1 - Schenkirsch, Gerhard A1 - Schmalenberg, Harald A1 - Schmidt, Peter A1 - Schneider, Constanze A1 - Schubotz, Birgit A1 - Seide, Anika A1 - Strecker, Paul A1 - Taubenheim, Sabine A1 - Wackes, Matthias A1 - Weiß, Steffen A1 - Welke, Claudia A1 - Werner, Carmen A1 - Wittekind, Christian A1 - Wulff, Jörg A1 - Zettl, Heike A1 - Klug, Stefanie J. T1 - Tumour stage distribution and survival of malignant melanoma in Germany 2002-2011 JF - BMC Cancer N2 - Background Over the past two decades, there has been a rising trend in malignant melanoma incidence worldwide. In 2008, Germany introduced a nationwide skin cancer screening program starting at age 35. The aims of this study were to analyse the distribution of malignant melanoma tumour stages over time, as well as demographic and regional differences in stage distribution and survival of melanoma patients. Methods Pooled data from 61 895 malignant melanoma patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2011 and documented in 28 German population-based and hospital-based clinical cancer registries were analysed using descriptive methods, joinpoint regression, logistic regression and relative survival. Results The number of annually documented cases increased by 53.2% between 2002 (N = 4 779) and 2011 (N = 7 320). There was a statistically significant continuous positive trend in the proportion of stage UICC I cases diagnosed between 2002 and 2011, compared to a negative trend for stage UICC II. No trends were found for stages UICC III and IV respectively. Age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.97–0.97), sex (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.25), date of diagnosis (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04–1.06), ‘diagnosis during screening’ (OR 3.24, 95% CI 2.50–4.19) and place of residence (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.16–1.30) had a statistically significant influence on the tumour stage at diagnosis. The overall 5-year relative survival for invasive cases was 83.4% (95% CI 82.8–83.9%). Conclusions No distinct changes in the distribution of malignant melanoma tumour stages among those aged 35 and older were seen that could be directly attributed to the introduction of skin cancer screening in 2008. " KW - Malignant melanoma KW - TNM staging KW - Survival analysis KW - Skin cancer screening KW - Stage distribution Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164544 VL - 16 IS - 936 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weissenberger, Manuel A1 - Heinz, Tizian A1 - Rueckl, Kilian A1 - Rudert, Maximilian A1 - Klug, Alexander A1 - Hoffmann, Reinhard A1 - Schmidt-Horlohé, Kay T1 - No functional differences in anatomic reconstruction with one vs. two suture anchors after non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps brachii tendon rupture: a case report and review of the literature JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders N2 - Background Surgical reattachment of the tendon is still the gold standard for ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Several fixation techniques have been described in the literature, with suture anchors being one of the most common fixation techniques. Currently, there is no data available on how many anchors are required for a safe and stable refixation. In this case report clinical data of a patient with non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps tendon ruptures treated with a different number of suture anchors for each side (one vs. two) are demonstrated. Case presentation A 47-year-old factory worker suffered a rupture of the distal biceps tendon on both arms following two different occasions. The left side was fixed using a single suture anchor, while refixation on the right side was performed with two anchors. The patient was prospectively followed for one year. Functional outcome was assessed using the Andrews Carson Score (ACS), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score after six, twelve, 24 and 48 weeks. Furthermore, an isokinetic strength measurement for flexion strength was performed after 24 and 48 weeks. After 48 weeks the patient presented with excellent functional outcome scores and no follow-up complications. During the follow-up period, no differences in the functional scores nor in the isokinetic flexion strength measurement could be detected. Furthermore, no radiological complications (like heterotopic ossifications) could be detected in the postoperative radiographs after one year. Conclusions Anatomic reattachment of the distal biceps tendon is a successful operative treatment option for distal biceps tendon ruptures. Suture anchor fixation remains one of the most common techniques, as it allows fast surgery and provides good results with respect to range of motion (ROM) and functional scoring according to the current literature. However, the number of anchors required for a stable fixation remains unclear. As indicated by our presented case, we hypothesize, that there are no significant differences between a one-point or a two-point fixation. In the presented case report, no intraindividual differences between the usage of one versus two suture anchors were evident in the short-term follow-up. KW - Non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps tendon rupture KW - Distal biceps tendon repair KW - Anatomic reattachment KW - Suture anchor KW - Case report Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229266 VL - 21 ER -