TY  - JOUR
A1  - Munawar, Umair
A1  - Zhou, Xiang
A1  - Prommersberger, Sabrina
A1  - Nerreter, Silvia
A1  - Vogt, Cornelia
A1  - Steinhardt, Maximilian J.
A1  - Truger, Marietta
A1  - Mersi, Julia
A1  - Teufel, Eva
A1  - Han, Seungbin
A1  - Haertle, Larissa
A1  - Banholzer, Nicole
A1  - Eiring, Patrick
A1  - Danhof, Sophia
A1  - Navarro-Aguadero, Miguel Angel
A1  - Fernandez-Martin, Adrian
A1  - Ortiz-Ruiz, Alejandra
A1  - Barrio, Santiago
A1  - Gallardo, Miguel
A1  - Valeri, Antonio
A1  - Castellano, Eva
A1  - Raab, Peter
A1  - Rudert, Maximilian
A1  - Haferlach, Claudia
A1  - Sauer, Markus
A1  - Hudecek, Michael
A1  - Martinez-Lopez, J.
A1  - Waldschmidt, Johannes
A1  - Einsele, Hermann
A1  - Rasche, Leo
A1  - Kortüm, K. Martin
T1  - Impaired FADD/BID signaling mediates cross-resistance to immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma
JF  - Communications Biology
N2  - The treatment landscape in multiple myeloma (MM) is shifting from genotoxic drugs to immunotherapies. Monoclonal antibodies, immunoconjugates, T-cell engaging antibodies and CART cells have been incorporated into routine treatment algorithms, resulting in improved response rates. Nevertheless, patients continue to relapse and the underlying mechanisms of resistance remain poorly understood. While Impaired death receptor signaling has been reported to mediate resistance to CART in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, this mechanism yet remains to be elucidated in context of novel immunotherapies for MM. Here, we describe impaired death receptor signaling as a novel mechanism of resistance to T-cell mediated immunotherapies in MM. This resistance seems exclusive to novel immunotherapies while sensitivity to conventional anti-tumor therapies being preserved in vitro. As a proof of concept, we present a confirmatory clinical case indicating that the FADD/BID axis is required for meaningful responses to novel immunotherapies thus we report impaired death receptor signaling as a novel resistance mechanism to T-cell mediated immunotherapy in MM.
KW  - immunotherapy
KW  - translational research
Y1  - 2023
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357609
VL  - 6
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
A1  - Weisel, Katja C.
A1  - Song, Kevin W.
A1  - Delforge, Michel
A1  - Karlin, Lionel
A1  - Goldschmidt, Hartmut
A1  - Moreau, Philippe
A1  - Banos, Anne
A1  - Oriol, Albert
A1  - Garderet, Laurent
A1  - Cavo, Michele
A1  - Ivanova, Valentina
A1  - Alegre, Adrian
A1  - Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin
A1  - Chen, Christine
A1  - Spencer, Andrew
A1  - Knop, Stefan
A1  - Bahlis, Nizar J.
A1  - Renner, Christoph
A1  - Yu, Xin
A1  - Hong, Kevin
A1  - Sternas, Lars
A1  - Jacques, Christian
A1  - Zaki, Mohamed H.
A1  - San Miguel, Jesus F.
T1  - Cytogenetics and long-term survival of patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone
JF  - Haematologica
N2  - Patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who no longer receive benefit from novel agents have limited treatment options and short expected survival. del(17p) and t(4;14) are correlated with shortened survival. The phase 3 MM-003 trial demonstrated significant progression-free and overall survival benefits from treatment with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone compared to high-dose dexamethasone among patients in whom bortezomib and lenalidomide treatment had failed. At an updated median follow-up of 15.4 months, the progression-free survival was 4.0 versus 1.9 months (HR, 0.50; P<0.001), and median overall survival was 13.1 versus 8.1 months (HR, 0.72; P=0.009). Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone, compared with high-dose dexamethasone, improved progression-free survival in patients with del(17p) (4.6 versus 1.1 months; HR, 0.34; P < 0.001), t(4;14) (2.8 versus 1.9 months; HR, 0.49; P=0.028), and in standard-risk patients (4.2 versus 2.3 months; HR, 0.55; P<0.001). Although the majority of patients treated with high-dose dexamethasone took pomalidomide after discontinuation, the overall survival of patients treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone or highdose dexamethasone was 12.6 versus 7.7 months (HR, 0.45; P=0.008) in patients with del(17p), 7.5 versus 4.9 months (HR, 1.12; P=0.761) in those with t(4;14), and 14.0 versus 9.0 months (HR, 0.85; P=0.380) in standard-risk subjects. The overall response rate was higher in patients treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone than in those treated with high-dose dexamethasone both among standard-risk patients (35.2% versus 9.7%) and those with del(17p) (31.8% versus 4.3%), whereas it was similar in patients with t(4; 14) (15.9% versus 13.3%). The safety of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone was consistent with initial reports. In conclusion, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is efficacious in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and del(17p) and/or t(4;14).
KW  - translocation
KW  - plus dexamethasone
KW  - deletion 17P
KW  - bortezomib
KW  - therapy
KW  - abnormalities
KW  - stem-cell transplantation
KW  - growth-factor receptor 3
KW  - high-risk cytogenetics
KW  - intergroupe francophone
Y1  - 2015
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-140349
VL  - 100
IS  - 10
SP  - 1327
EP  - 1333
ER  -