TY - JOUR A1 - Kleijn, David A1 - Winfree, Rachael A1 - Bartomeus, Ignasi A1 - Carvalheiro, Luísa G. A1 - Henry, Mickael A1 - Isaacs, Rufus A1 - Klein, Alexandra-Maria A1 - Kremen, Claire A1 - M'Gonigle, Leithen K. A1 - Rader, Romina A1 - Ricketts, Taylor H. A1 - Williams, Neal M. A1 - Adamson, Nancy Lee A1 - Ascher, John S. A1 - Báldi, András A1 - Batáry, Péter A1 - Benjamin, Faye A1 - Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. A1 - Blitzer, Eleanor J. A1 - Bommarco, Riccardo A1 - Brand, Mariette R. A1 - Bretagnolle, Vincent A1 - Button, Lindsey A1 - Cariveau, Daniel P. A1 - Chifflet, Rémy A1 - Colville, Jonathan F. A1 - Danforth, Bryan N. A1 - Elle, Elizabeth A1 - Garratt, Michael P. D. A1 - Herzog, Felix A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Howlett, Brad G. A1 - Jauker, Frank A1 - Jha, Shalene A1 - Knop, Eva A1 - Krewenka, Kristin M. A1 - Le Féon, Violette A1 - Mandelik, Yael A1 - May, Emily A. A1 - Park, Mia G. A1 - Pisanty, Gideon A1 - Reemer, Menno A1 - Riedinger, Verena A1 - Rollin, Orianne A1 - Rundlöf, Maj A1 - Sardiñas, Hillary S. A1 - Scheper, Jeroen A1 - Sciligo, Amber R. A1 - Smith, Henrik G. A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Thorp, Robbin A1 - Tscharntke, Teja A1 - Verhulst, Jort A1 - Viana, Blandina F. A1 - Vaissière, Bernard E. A1 - Veldtman, Ruan A1 - Ward, Kimiora L. A1 - Westphal, Catrin A1 - Potts, Simon G. T1 - Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation JF - Nature Communications N2 - There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost- effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost- effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments. KW - ecosystem services KW - european countries KW - abundance KW - native bees KW - biodiversity conservation KW - plant diversity KW - fruit set KW - productivity KW - decline KW - pollen Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-151879 VL - 6 IS - 7414 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Woodcock, B. A. A1 - Garratt, M. P. D. A1 - Powney, G. D. A1 - Shaw, R. F. A1 - Osborne, J. L. A1 - Soroka, J. A1 - Lindström, S. A. M. A1 - Stanley, D. A1 - Ouvrard, P. A1 - Edwards, M. E. A1 - Jauker, F. A1 - McCracken, M. E. A1 - Zou, Y. A1 - Potts, S. G. A1 - Rundlöf, M. A1 - Noriega, J. A. A1 - Greenop, A. A1 - Smith, H. G. A1 - Bommarco, R. A1 - van der Werf, W. A1 - Stout, J. C. A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, I. A1 - Morandin, L. A1 - Bullock, J. M. A1 - Pywell, R. F. T1 - Meta-analysis reveals that pollinator functional diversity and abundance enhance crop pollination and yield JF - Nature Communications N2 - How insects promote crop pollination remains poorly understood in terms of the contribution of functional trait differences between species. We used meta-analyses to test for correlations between community abundance, species richness and functional trait metrics with oilseed rape yield, a globally important crop. While overall abundance is consistently important in predicting yield, functional divergence between species traits also showed a positive correlation. This result supports the complementarity hypothesis that pollination function is maintained by non-overlapping trait distributions. In artificially constructed communities (mesocosms), species richness is positively correlated with yield, although this effect is not seen under field conditions. As traits of the dominant species do not predict yield above that attributed to the effect of abundance alone, we find no evidence in support of the mass ratio hypothesis. Management practices increasing not just pollinator abundance, but also functional divergence, could benefit oilseed rape agriculture. KW - agroecology KW - agriculture KW - ecosystem services KW - environmental sciences Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233787 VL - 10 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Viljur, Mari‐Liis A1 - Abella, Scott R. A1 - Adámek, Martin A1 - Alencar, Janderson Batista Rodrigues A1 - Barber, Nicholas A. A1 - Beudert, Burkhard A1 - Burkle, Laura A. A1 - Cagnolo, Luciano A1 - Campos, Brent R. A1 - Chao, Anne A1 - Chergui, Brahim A1 - Choi, Chang‐Yong A1 - Cleary, Daniel F. R. A1 - Davis, Thomas Seth A1 - Dechnik‐Vázquez, Yanus A. A1 - Downing, William M. A1 - Fuentes‐Ramirez, Andrés A1 - Gandhi, Kamal J. K. A1 - Gehring, Catherine A1 - Georgiev, Kostadin B. A1 - Gimbutas, Mark A1 - Gongalsky, Konstantin B. A1 - Gorbunova, Anastasiya Y. A1 - Greenberg, Cathryn H. A1 - Hylander, Kristoffer A1 - Jules, Erik S. A1 - Korobushkin, Daniil I. A1 - Köster, Kajar A1 - Kurth, Valerie A1 - Lanham, Joseph Drew A1 - Lazarina, Maria A1 - Leverkus, Alexandro B. A1 - Lindenmayer, David A1 - Marra, Daniel Magnabosco A1 - Martín‐Pinto, Pablo A1 - Meave, Jorge A. A1 - Moretti, Marco A1 - Nam, Hyun‐Young A1 - Obrist, Martin K. A1 - Petanidou, Theodora A1 - Pons, Pere A1 - Potts, Simon G. A1 - Rapoport, Irina B. A1 - Rhoades, Paul R. A1 - Richter, Clark A1 - Saifutdinov, Ruslan A. A1 - Sanders, Nathan J. A1 - Santos, Xavier A1 - Steel, Zachary A1 - Tavella, Julia A1 - Wendenburg, Clara A1 - Wermelinger, Beat A1 - Zaitsev, Andrey S. A1 - Thorn, Simon T1 - The effect of natural disturbances on forest biodiversity: an ecological synthesis JF - Biological Reviews N2 - Disturbances alter biodiversity via their specific characteristics, including severity and extent in the landscape, which act at different temporal and spatial scales. Biodiversity response to disturbance also depends on the community characteristics and habitat requirements of species. Untangling the mechanistic interplay of these factors has guided disturbance ecology for decades, generating mixed scientific evidence of biodiversity responses to disturbance. Understanding the impact of natural disturbances on biodiversity is increasingly important due to human‐induced changes in natural disturbance regimes. In many areas, major natural forest disturbances, such as wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks, are becoming more frequent, intense, severe, and widespread due to climate change and land‐use change. Conversely, the suppression of natural disturbances threatens disturbance‐dependent biota. Using a meta‐analytic approach, we analysed a global data set (with most sampling concentrated in temperate and boreal secondary forests) of species assemblages of 26 taxonomic groups, including plants, animals, and fungi collected from forests affected by wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks. The overall effect of natural disturbances on α‐diversity did not differ significantly from zero, but some taxonomic groups responded positively to disturbance, while others tended to respond negatively. Disturbance was beneficial for taxonomic groups preferring conditions associated with open canopies (e.g. hymenopterans and hoverflies), whereas ground‐dwelling groups and/or groups typically associated with shady conditions (e.g. epigeic lichens and mycorrhizal fungi) were more likely to be negatively impacted by disturbance. Across all taxonomic groups, the highest α‐diversity in disturbed forest patches occurred under moderate disturbance severity, i.e. with approximately 55% of trees killed by disturbance. We further extended our meta‐analysis by applying a unified diversity concept based on Hill numbers to estimate α‐diversity changes in different taxonomic groups across a gradient of disturbance severity measured at the stand scale and incorporating other disturbance features. We found that disturbance severity negatively affected diversity for Hill number q = 0 but not for q = 1 and q = 2, indicating that diversity–disturbance relationships are shaped by species relative abundances. Our synthesis of α‐diversity was extended by a synthesis of disturbance‐induced change in species assemblages, and revealed that disturbance changes the β‐diversity of multiple taxonomic groups, including some groups that were not affected at the α‐diversity level (birds and woody plants). Finally, we used mixed rarefaction/extrapolation to estimate biodiversity change as a function of the proportion of forests that were disturbed, i.e. the disturbance extent measured at the landscape scale. The comparison of intact and naturally disturbed forests revealed that both types of forests provide habitat for unique species assemblages, whereas species diversity in the mixture of disturbed and undisturbed forests peaked at intermediate values of disturbance extent in the simulated landscape. Hence, the relationship between α‐diversity and disturbance severity in disturbed forest stands was strikingly similar to the relationship between species richness and disturbance extent in a landscape consisting of both disturbed and undisturbed forest habitats. This result suggests that both moderate disturbance severity and moderate disturbance extent support the highest levels of biodiversity in contemporary forest landscapes. KW - natural disturbance KW - diversity–disturbance relationship KW - disturbance severity KW - disturbance extent KW - intermediate disturbance hypothesis KW - forest communities KW - α‐diversity KW - β‐diversity Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-287168 VL - 97 IS - 5 SP - 1930 EP - 1947 ER -