TY - JOUR A1 - Stölzel, F. A1 - Mohr, B. A1 - Kramer, M. A1 - Oelschlägel, U. A1 - Bochtler, T. A1 - Berdel, W. E. A1 - Kaufmann, M. A1 - Baldus, C. D. A1 - Schäfer-Eckart, K. A1 - Stuhlmann, R. A1 - Einsele, H. A1 - Krause, S. W. A1 - Serve, H. A1 - Hänel, M. A1 - Herbst, R. A1 - Neubauer, A. A1 - Sohlbach, K. A1 - Mayer, J. A1 - Middeke, J. M. A1 - Platzbecker, U. A1 - Schaich, M. A1 - Krämer, A. A1 - Röllig, C. A1 - Schetelig, J. A1 - Bornhäuser, M. A1 - Ehninger, G. T1 - Karyotype complexity and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia JF - Blood Cancer Journal N2 - A complex aberrant karyotype consisting of multiple unrelated cytogenetic abnormalities is associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The European Leukemia Net classification and the UK Medical Research Council recommendation provide prognostic categories that differ in the definition of unbalanced aberrations as well as the number of single aberrations. The aim of this study on 3526 AML patients was to redefine and validate a cutoff for karyotype complexity in AML with regard to adverse prognosis. Our study demonstrated that (1) patients with a pure hyperdiploid karyotype have an adverse risk irrespective of the number of chromosomal gains, (2) patients with translocation t(9;11)(p21∼22;q23) have an intermediate risk independent of the number of additional aberrations, (3) patients with 4 abnormalities have an adverse risk per se and (4) patients with three aberrations in the absence of abnormalities of strong influence (hyperdiploid karyotype, t(9;11)(p21∼22;q23), CBF-AML, unique adverse-risk aberrations) have borderline intermediate/adverse risk with a reduced overall survival compared with patients with a normal karyotype. KW - Cancer genetics KW - Genetics research Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164530 VL - 6 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Eckardt, Jan-Niklas A1 - Stasik, Sebastian A1 - Kramer, Michael A1 - Röllig, Christoph A1 - Krämer, Alwin A1 - Scholl, Sebastian A1 - Hochhaus, Andreas A1 - Crysandt, Martina A1 - Brümmendorf, Tim H. A1 - Naumann, Ralph A1 - Steffen, Björn A1 - Kunzmann, Volker A1 - Einsele, Hermann A1 - Schaich, Markus A1 - Burchert, Andreas A1 - Neubauer, Andreas A1 - Schäfer-Eckart, Kerstin A1 - Schliemann, Christoph A1 - Krause, Stefan W. A1 - Herbst, Regina A1 - Hänel, Mathias A1 - Frickhofen, Norbert A1 - Noppeney, Richard A1 - Kaiser, Ulrich A1 - Baldus, Claudia D. A1 - Kaufmann, Martin A1 - Rácil, Zdenek A1 - Platzbecker, Uwe A1 - Berdel, Wolfgang E. A1 - Mayer, Jiří A1 - Serve, Hubert A1 - Müller-Tidow, Carsten A1 - Ehninger, Gerhard A1 - Stölzel, Friedrich A1 - Kroschinsky, Frank A1 - Schetelig, Johannes A1 - Bornhäuser, Martin A1 - Thiede, Christian A1 - Middeke, Jan Moritz T1 - Loss-of-function mutations of BCOR are an independent marker of adverse outcomes in intensively treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia JF - Cancers N2 - Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by recurrent genetic events. The BCL6 corepressor (BCOR) and its homolog, the BCL6 corepressor-like 1 (BCORL1), have been reported to be rare but recurrent mutations in AML. Previously, smaller studies have reported conflicting results regarding impacts on outcomes. Here, we retrospectively analyzed a large cohort of 1529 patients with newly diagnosed and intensively treated AML. BCOR and BCORL1 mutations were found in 71 (4.6%) and 53 patients (3.5%), respectively. Frequently co-mutated genes were DNTM3A, TET2 and RUNX1. Mutated BCORL1 and loss-of-function mutations of BCOR were significantly more common in the ELN2017 intermediate-risk group. Patients harboring loss-of-function mutations of BCOR had a significantly reduced median event-free survival (HR = 1.464 (95%-Confidence Interval (CI): 1.005–2.134), p = 0.047), relapse-free survival (HR = 1.904 (95%-CI: 1.163–3.117), p = 0.01), and trend for reduced overall survival (HR = 1.495 (95%-CI: 0.990–2.258), p = 0.056) in multivariable analysis. Our study establishes a novel role for loss-of-function mutations of BCOR regarding risk stratification in AML, which may influence treatment allocation. KW - acute myeloid leukemia KW - BCOR KW - BCORL1 KW - loss-of-function KW - risk stratification KW - survival Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-236735 SN - 2072-6694 VL - 13 IS - 9 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Röllig, C. A1 - Kramer, M. A1 - Gabrecht, M. A1 - Hänel, M. A1 - Herbst, R. A1 - Kaiser, U. A1 - Schmitz, N. A1 - Kullmer, J. A1 - Fetscher, S. A1 - Link, H. A1 - Mantovani-Löffler, L. A1 - Krümpelmann, U. A1 - Neuhaus, T. A1 - Heits, F. A1 - Einsele, H. A1 - Ritter, B. A1 - Bornhäuser, M. A1 - Schetelig, J. A1 - Thiede, C. A1 - Mohr, B. A1 - Schaich, M. A1 - Platzbecker, U. A1 - Schäfer-Eckart, K. A1 - Krämer, A. A1 - Berdel, W. E. A1 - Serve, H. A1 - Ehninger, G. A1 - Schuler, U. S. T1 - Intermediate-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone versus standard-dose cytarabine plus daunorubicin for acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients JF - Annals of Oncology N2 - Background: The combination of intermediate-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone (IMA) can induce high complete remission rates with acceptable toxicity in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We present the final results of a randomized-controlled trial comparing IMA with the standard 7+3 induction regimen consisting of continuous infusion cytarabine plus daunorubicin (DA). Patients and methods: Patients with newly diagnosed AML>60 years were randomized to receive either intermediate-dose cytarabine (1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1, 3, 5, 7) plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m(2) days 1-3) (IMA) or standard induction therapy with cytarabine (100 mg/m(2) continuously days 1-7) plus daunorubicin (45 mg/m(2) days 3-5) (DA). Patients in complete remission after DA received intermediate-dose cytarabine plus amsacrine as consolidation treatment, whereas patients after IMA were consolidated with standard-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone. Results: Between February 2005 and October 2009, 485 patients were randomized; 241 for treatment arm DA and 244 for IMA; 76% of patients were >65 years. The complete response rate after DA was 39% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 33-45] versus 55% (95% CI: 49-61) after IMA (odds ratio 1.89, P = 0.001). The 6-week early-death rate was 14% in both arms. Relapse-free survival curves were superimposable in the first year, but separated afterwards, resulting in 3-year relapse-free survival rates of 29% versus 14% in the DA versus IMA arms, respectively (P = 0.042). The median overall survival was 10 months in both arms (P = 0.513). Conclusion: The dose escalation of cytarabine in induction therapy lead to improved remission rates in the elderly AML patients. This did not translate into a survival advantage, most likely due to differences in consolidation treatment. Thus, effective consolidation strategies need to be further explored. In combination with an effective consolidation strategy, the use of intermediate-dose cytarabine in induction may improve curative treatment for elderly AML patients. KW - acute myeloid leukemia KW - cytarabine dose KW - elderly Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-226473 VL - 29 IS - 4 ER -