Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (5)
Document Type
- Journal article (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Keywords
- Anaphylaxis (1)
- Aspergillus (1)
- BAL (1)
- Bienengiftallergie (1)
- Double sensitization (1)
- EDA-NOCV (1)
- Field sting (1)
- Honey bee (1)
- Hymenoptera (1)
- Hymenoptera venom (1)
Die Bienen-/Wespengiftallergie ist auf der einen Seite eine potentiell lebensbedrohliche IgE-vermittelte Allergiekrankheit, in Deutschland neben den Nahrungsmittelallergien die häufigste Ursache für eine tödlich verlaufende Anaphylaxie. Auf der anderen Seite steht mit der Bienen-/Wespengift-spezifischen Immuntherapie (SIT) gerade für diese Allergie seit Jahrzehnten eine hochwirksame kausale Therapie zur Verfügung. Placebokontrollierte Studien mit unbehandelten Patienten sind daher aus ethischen Gründen nicht vertretbar. Neue Erkenntnisse zur Sicherheit dieser Therapieform können nur aus der Verlaufsbeobachtung standardisiert behandelter Patientenkollektive gewonnen werden. Der besondere Wert der hier analysierten großen Patientenserie liegt vor allem darin, dass alle Patienten in einer Allergieambulanz (der Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie) betreut wurden. Im gesamten Behandlungszeitraum aller 679 Patienten wurde die Diagnostik und Therapie der Bienen-/Wespengiftallergie hoch standardisiert durchgeführt und nicht verändert. Die dadurch gleichbleibende Betreuung garantierten Qualität, Umfang und Homogenität der Dokumentation und damit die Vergleichbarkeit der retrospektiv erfassten Daten über den gesamten Zeitraum 1988 bis 2008. Für die besonders wichtige Verlaufsbeobachtung nach Ende der spezifischen Immuntherapie (SIT) wurden zusätzlich 616 der 679 Patienten aus Unterfranken und Umgebung direkt telefonisch befragt. Die bekannten charakteristischen Merkmale von Patienten mit Bienen-/Wespengiftallergie zeigten sich auch in dem untersuchten Kollektiv. Imkertätigkeit ist die wahrscheinlichste Erklärung warum Bienengiftallergiker jünger und häufiger männlich sind. Die prognostisch bedeutsamen Schweregrade der allergischen Indikatorstichreaktion (das Stichereignis mit der schwersten anaphylaktischen Reaktion vor SIT) unterscheiden sich zwischen Bienen- und Wespengiftallergikern dagegen nicht. In den diagnostischen Untersuchungen vor und auch am Ende der SIT waren die Schwellenwertkonzentrationen des Intrakutan- und Pricktests bei Bienengiftallergikern im Vergleich zu den Wespengiftallergikern signifikant niedriger, die spezifischen IgE-Serumspiegel höher. Die Wirksamkeit der SIT mit Bienengift betrug 89,0 %. Nur 11,0 % der Patienten (8 von 73 Patienten mit erneutem Bienenstich) hatten nach Beginn der SIT erneut eine
The impact of imatinib dose on response rates and survival in older patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase has not been studied well. We analyzed data from the German CML-Study IV, a randomized five-arm treatment optimization study in newly diagnosed BCR-ABL-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Patients randomized to imatinib 400 mg/day (IM400) or imatinib 800 mg/day (IM800) and stratified according to age (≥65 years vs. <65 years) were compared regarding dose, response, adverse events, rates of progression, and survival. The full 800 mg dose was given after a 6-week run-in period with imatinib 400 mg/day. The dose could then be reduced according to tolerability. A total of 828 patients were randomized to IM400 or IM800. Seven hundred eighty-four patients were evaluable (IM400, 382; IM800, 402). One hundred ten patients (29 %) on IM400 and 83 (21 %) on IM800 were ≥65 years. The median dose per day was lower for patients ≥65 years on IM800, with the highest median dose in the first year (466 mg/day for patients ≥65 years vs. 630 mg/day for patients <65 years). Older patients on IM800 achieved major molecular remission and deep molecular remission as fast as younger patients, in contrast to standard dose imatinib with which older patients achieved remissions much later than younger patients. Grades 3 and 4 adverse events were similar in both age groups. Five-year relative survival for older patients was comparable to that of younger patients. We suggest that the optimal dose for older patients is higher than 400 mg/day. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00055874
Background
Referring to individuals with reactivity to honey bee and Vespula venom in diagnostic tests, the umbrella terms “double sensitization” or “double positivity” cover patients with true clinical double allergy and those allergic to a single venom with asymptomatic sensitization to the other. There is no international consensus on whether immunotherapy regimens should generally include both venoms in double sensitized patients.
Objective
We investigated the long-term outcome of single venom-based immunotherapy with regard to potential risk factors for treatment failure and specifically compared the risk of relapse in mono sensitized and double sensitized patients.
Methods
Re-sting data were obtained from 635 patients who had completed at least 3 years of immunotherapy between 1988 and 2008. The adequate venom for immunotherapy was selected using an algorithm based on clinical details and the results of diagnostic tests.
Results
Of 635 patients, 351 (55.3%) were double sensitized to both venoms. The overall re-exposure rate to Hymenoptera stings during and after immunotherapy was 62.4%; the relapse rate was 7.1% (6.0% in mono sensitized, 7.8% in double sensitized patients). Recurring anaphylaxis was statistically less severe than the index sting reaction (P = 0.004). Double sensitization was not significantly related to relapsing anaphylaxis (P = 0.56), but there was a tendency towards an increased risk of relapse in a subgroup of patients with equal reactivity to both venoms in diagnostic tests (P = 0.15).
Conclusions
Single venom-based immunotherapy over 3 to 5 years effectively and long-lastingly protects the vast majority of both mono sensitized and double sensitized Hymenoptera venom allergic patients. Double venom immunotherapy is indicated in clinically double allergic patients reporting systemic reactions to stings of both Hymenoptera and in those with equal reactivity to both venoms in diagnostic tests who have not reliably identified the culprit stinging insect.
Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a severe complication in immunocompromised patients. Early diagnosis is crucial to decrease its high mortality, yet the diagnostic gold standard (histopathology and culture) is time‐consuming and cannot offer early confirmation of IA. Detection of IA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) shows promising potential. Various studies have analysed its diagnostic performance in different clinical settings, especially addressing optimal specimen selection. However, direct comparison of different types of specimens in individual patients though essential, is rarely reported. We systematically assessed the diagnostic performance of an Aspergillus‐specific nested PCR by investigating specimens from the site of infection and comparing it with concurrent blood samples in individual patients (pts) with IA. In a retrospective multicenter analysis PCR was performed on clinical specimens (n = 138) of immunocompromised high‐risk pts (n = 133) from the site of infection together with concurrent blood samples. 38 pts were classified as proven/probable, 67 as possible and 28 as no IA according to 2008 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group consensus definitions. A considerably superior performance of PCR from the site of infection was observed particularly in pts during antifungal prophylaxis (AFP)/antifungal therapy (AFT). Besides a specificity of 85%, sensitivity varied markedly in BAL (64%), CSF (100%), tissue samples (67%) as opposed to concurrent blood samples (8%). Our results further emphasise the need for investigating clinical samples from the site of infection in case of suspected IA to further establish or rule out the diagnosis.
Diplatinum A‐frame complexes with a bridging (di)boron unit in the apex position were synthesized in a single step by the double oxidative addition of dihalo(di)borane precursors at a bis(diphosphine)‐bridged Pt\(^{0}\)\(_{2}\) complex. While structurally analogous to well‐known μ‐borylene complexes, in which delocalized dative three‐center‐two‐electron M‐B‐M bonding prevails, theoretical investigations into the nature of Pt−B bonding in these A‐frame complexes show them to be rare dimetalla(di)boranes displaying two electron‐sharing Pt−B σ‐bonds. This is experimentally reflected in the low kinetic stability of these compounds, which are prone to loss of the (di)boron bridgehead unit.