Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Language
- English (3)
Keywords
- translation (2)
- CRISPR/Cas-Methode (1)
- RNA virus (1)
- RNS-Viren (1)
- Zelle (1)
- frameshifting (1)
- infection (1)
- programmed ribosomal frameshifting (1)
- ribosome profiling (1)
- self-targeting CRISPR-Cas (1)
Institute
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
CRISPR-Cas systems are highly diverse and canonically function as prokaryotic adaptive immune systems. The canonical resistance mechanism relies on spacers that are complementary to the invaders' nucleic acids. By accidental incorporation or other mechanisms, prokaryotes can also acquire self-targeting spacers that are complementary to their own genome. As self-targeting commonly leads to lethal autoimmunity, the existence of self-targeting spacers poses a paradox. In Chapter 1, we provide an overview of the prevalence of self-targeting spacers, summarize how they can be incorporated, and which means can be employed by the host to evade lethal self-targeting. In addition, we outline alternative functions of CRISPR-Cas systems that are associated with self-targeting spacers. Whether CRISPR-Cas systems can efficiently target their own genome depends heavily on the presence of protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) next to the target region. In Chapter 2, we developed a method to determine PAM requirements. Thereby, we specifically focused on type I systems that engage multi-protein complexes, which are challenging to assess. Using the cell-free transcription-translation (TXTL) system, we developed an enrichment-based binding assay and validated its reliability by examining the well-known PAM requirements of the E. coli type I-E system. In Chapter 3, we applied the TXTL-based PAM assay to assess 16 additional CRISPR-Cas systems. These 16 systems included three CRISPR-Cas associated transposons (CASTs). CASTs are recently discovered transposons that employ CRISPR-Cas systems in a non-canonical function for the directed integration of the transposon. To further characterize CASTs in TXTL outside their PAM requirements, we reconstituted the transposition of CASTs in TXTL. In Chapter 4, we turned to non-canonical self-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems, which were already discussed in Chapter 1. While investigating how the plant pathogen Xanthomonas albilineans survives self-targeting by its two endogenous CRISPR-Cas systems, we identified multiple putative anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) in the genome of X. albilineans. Two of the Acrs, named AcrIC11 and AcrIF12Xal, inhibited degradation by their respective CRISPR-Cas systems but still retained Cascade-binding ability, and appear responsible for the lack of autoimmunity in X. albilineans. In summary, we developed new technologies that eased the investigation of non-canonical multi-component systems and, if applied to additional systems, might reveal unique properties that could be implemented in new CRISPR-Cas based tools.
The RNAs of many viruses contain a frameshift stimulatory element (FSE) that grants access to an alternate reading frame via −1 programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF). This −1PRF is essential for effective viral replication. The −1PRF efficiency relies on the presence of conserved RNA elements within the FSE, such as a slippery sequence, spacer, and a downstream secondary structure – often a hairpin or a pseudoknot. The PRF efficiency is also affected by trans-acting factors such as proteins, miRNAs and metabolites. The interactions of these factors with the RNA and the translation machinery have not yet been completely understood. Traditional ensemble methods used previously to study these events focus on the whole population of molecular species. This results in innate averaging of the molecular behavior and a loss of heterogeneity information.
Here, we first established the experimental workflow to study the RNA structures and the effect of potential trans-acting factors using single-molecule force spectroscopy technique, optical tweezers. Additionally, to streamline the data analysis, we developed an algorithm for automatized data processing.
Next, we harnessed this knowledge to study viral RNA elements responsible for stimulation of PRF and how the presence of trans-acting factors affects the RNA behavior. We further complemented these single-molecule structural data with ensemble functional assays to gain a complex view on the dynamics behind the programmed ribosomal frameshifting.
Specifically, two different viral RNA elements have been studied in the presented work. First, the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 FSE and the role of extended sequences have been explored. Then, the mode of action of the host-encoded trans-acting factor ZAP-S inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 PRF has been examined. Finally, the mechanism of the trans-acting viral factor induced PRF in Encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) has been uncovered.
RNA viruses rely entirely on the host machinery for their protein synthesis and harbor non-canonical translation mechanisms, such as alternative initiation and programmed –1 ribosomal frameshifting (–1PRF), to suit their specific needs. On the other hand, host cells have developed a variety of defensive strategies to safeguard their translational apparatus and at times transiently shut down global translation. An infection can lead to substantial translational remodeling in cells and translational control is critical during antiviral response. Due to their sheer diversity, this control is likely unique to each RNA virus and the intricacies of post-transcriptional regulation are unclear in certain viral species.
Here, we explored different aspects of translational regulation in virus-infected cells in detail. Using ribosome profiling, we extensively characterized the translational landscape in HIV-1 infected T cells, uncovering novel features of gene regulation in both host and virus. Additionally, we show that substantial pausing occurs prior to the frameshift site indicating complex regulatory mechanisms involving upstream viral RNA elements that can act as cis- regulators of frameshifting.
We also characterized the mechanistic details of trans- modulation of frameshifting by host- and virus-encoded proteins. Host antiviral protein ZAP-S binds to the SARS-CoV-2 frameshift site and destabilizes the stimulatory structure, leading to frameshift inhibition. On the other hand, EMCV 2A protein stabilizes the viral frameshift site, thereby, activating EMCV frameshifting. While both proteins were shown to be antagonistic in their mechanism, they interact with the host translational machinery. Furthermore, we showed that frameshifting can be regulated not just by proteins, but also by small molecules. High-throughput screening of natural and synthetic compounds identified two potent frameshift inhibitors that also impeded viral replication, namely trichangion and compound 25. Together, this work largely enhances our understanding of gene regulation mechanisms in virus-infected cells and further validates the druggability of viral –1 PRF site.