Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik
Refine
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (208)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (142)
- Doctoral Thesis (63)
- Report (2)
- Review (1)
Keywords
- Neurobiologie (41)
- Glioblastom (11)
- glioblastoma (11)
- Medizin (9)
- Glioblastoma (6)
- Vestibularisschwannom (6)
- Schädel-Hirn-Trauma (5)
- Subarachnoidalblutung (5)
- active zone (5)
- astrocytoma (5)
Institute
- Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik (208)
- Pathologisches Institut (19)
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik (16)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie (ab 2004) (11)
- Physiologisches Institut (9)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (6)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin (5)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik II) (5)
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (4)
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie (ehem. Abteilung für Neuroradiologie) (4)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
Introduction
In spinal surgery, precise instrumentation is essential. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of navigated, O-arm-controlled screw positioning in thoracic and lumbar spine instabilities.
Materials and methods
Posterior instrumentation procedures between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Pedicle screws were placed using 3D rotational fluoroscopy and neuronavigation. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed using a 6-grade scoring system. In addition, screw length was analyzed in relation to the vertebral body diameter. Intra- and postoperative revision rates were recorded.
Results
Thoracic and lumbar spine surgery was performed in 285 patients. Of 1704 pedicle screws, 1621 (95.1%) showed excellent positioning in 3D rotational fluoroscopy imaging. The lateral rim of either pedicle or vertebral body was protruded in 25 (1.5%) and 28 screws (1.6%), while the midline of the vertebral body was crossed in 8 screws (0.5%). Furthermore, 11 screws each (0.6%) fulfilled the criteria of full lateral and medial displacement. The median relative screw length was 92.6%. Intraoperative revision resulted in excellent positioning in 58 of 71 screws. Follow-up surgery due to missed primary malposition had to be performed for two screws in the same patient. Postsurgical symptom relief was reported in 82.1% of patients, whereas neurological deterioration occurred in 8.9% of cases with neurological follow-up.
Conclusions
Combination of neuronavigation and 3D rotational fluoroscopy control ensures excellent accuracy in pedicle screw positioning. As misplaced screws can be detected reliably and revised intraoperatively, repeated surgery for screw malposition is rarely required.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability in polytrauma and is often accompanied by concomitant injuries. We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis of data from a 10-year period from the multicenter database TraumaRegister DGU\(^®\) to analyze the impact of a concomitant femoral fracture on the outcome of TBI patients. A total of 4508 patients with moderate to critical TBI were included and matched by severity of TBI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk classification, initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), age, and sex. Patients who suffered combined TBI and femoral fracture showed increased mortality and worse outcome at the time of discharge, a higher chance of multi-organ failure, and a rate of neurosurgical intervention. Especially those with moderate TBI showed enhanced in-hospital mortality when presenting with a concomitant femoral fracture (p = 0.037). The choice of fracture treatment (damage control orthopedics vs. early total care) did not impact mortality. In summary, patients with combined TBI and femoral fracture have higher mortality, more in-hospital complications, an increased need for neurosurgical intervention, and inferior outcome compared to patients with TBI solely. More investigations are needed to decipher the pathophysiological consequences of a long-bone fracture on the outcome after TBI.
The metastatic suppressor BRMS1 interacts with critical steps of the metastatic cascade in many cancer entities. As gliomas rarely metastasize, BRMS1 has mainly been neglected in glioma research. However, its interaction partners, such as NFκB, VEGF, or MMPs, are old acquaintances in neurooncology. The steps regulated by BRMS1, such as invasion, migration, and apoptosis, are commonly dysregulated in gliomas. Therefore, BRMS1 shows potential as a regulator of glioma behavior. By bioinformatic analysis, in addition to our cohort of 118 specimens, we determined BRMS1 mRNA and protein expression as well as its correlation with the clinical course in astrocytomas IDH mutant, CNS WHO grade 2/3, and glioblastoma IDH wild-type, CNS WHO grade 4. Interestingly, we found BRMS1 protein expression to be significantly decreased in the aforementioned gliomas, while BRMS1 mRNA appeared to be overexpressed throughout. This dysregulation was independent of patients’ characteristics or survival. The protein and mRNA expression differences cannot be finally explained at this stage. However, they suggest a post-transcriptional dysregulation that has been previously described in other cancer entities. Our analyses present the first data on BRMS1 expression in gliomas that can provide a starting point for further investigations.
While glioblastoma (GBM) is still challenging to treat, novel immunotherapeutic approaches have shown promising effects in preclinical settings. However, their clinical breakthrough is hampered by complex interactions of GBM with the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we present an analysis of TME composition in a patient-derived organoid model (PDO) as well as in organotypic slice cultures (OSC). To obtain a more realistic model for immunotherapeutic testing, we introduce an enhanced PDO model. We manufactured PDOs and OSCs from fresh tissue of GBM patients and analyzed the TME. Enhanced PDOs (ePDOs) were obtained via co-culture with PBMCs (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) and compared to normal PDOs (nPDOs) and PT (primary tissue). At first, we showed that TME was not sustained in PDOs after a short time of culture. In contrast, TME was largely maintained in OSCs. Unfortunately, OSCs can only be cultured for up to 9 days. Thus, we enhanced the TME in PDOs by co-culturing PDOs and PBMCs from healthy donors. These cellular TME patterns could be preserved until day 21. The ePDO approach could mirror the interaction of GBM, TME and immunotherapeutic agents and may consequently represent a realistic model for individual immunotherapeutic drug testing in the future.
Non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and pancreatic cancer all present with high morbidity and mortality. Systemic chemotherapies have historically been the cornerstone of standard of care (SOC) regimens for many cancers, but are associated with systemic toxicity. Multimodal treatment combinations can help improve patient outcomes; however, implementation is limited by additive toxicities and potential drug–drug interactions. As such, there is a high unmet need to develop additional therapies to enhance the efficacy of SOC treatments without increasing toxicity. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that exert physical forces to disrupt cellular processes critical for cancer cell viability and tumor progression. The therapy is locoregional and is delivered noninvasively to the tumor site via a portable medical device that consists of field generator and arrays that are placed on the patient’s skin. As a noninvasive treatment modality, TTFields therapy-related adverse events mainly consist of localized skin reactions, which are manageable with effective acute and prophylactic treatments. TTFields selectively target cancer cells through a multi-mechanistic approach without affecting healthy cells and tissues. Therefore, the application of TTFields therapy concomitant with other cancer treatments may lead to enhanced efficacy, with low risk of further systemic toxicity. In this review, we explore TTFields therapy concomitant with taxanes in both preclinical and clinical settings. The summarized data suggest that TTFields therapy concomitant with taxanes may be beneficial in the treatment of certain cancers.
Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) greatly advances structural studies of diverse biological tissues. For example, presynaptic active zone (AZ) nanotopology is resolved in increasing detail. Immunofluorescence imaging of AZ proteins usually relies on epitope preservation using aldehyde-based immunocompetent fixation. Cryofixation techniques, such as high-pressure freezing (HPF) and freeze substitution (FS), are widely used for ultrastructural studies of presynaptic architecture in electron microscopy (EM). HPF/FS demonstrated nearer-to-native preservation of AZ ultrastructure, e.g., by facilitating single filamentous structures. Here, we present a protocol combining the advantages of HPF/FS and direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) to quantify nanotopology of the AZ scaffold protein Bruchpilot (Brp) at neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) of Drosophila melanogaster. Using this standardized model, we tested for preservation of Brp clusters in different FS protocols compared to classical aldehyde fixation. In HPF/FS samples, presynaptic boutons were structurally well preserved with ~22% smaller Brp clusters that allowed quantification of subcluster topology. In summary, we established a standardized near-to-native preparation and immunohistochemistry protocol for SMLM analyses of AZ protein clusters in a defined model synapse. Our protocol could be adapted to study protein arrangements at single-molecule resolution in other intact tissue preparations.
Im Rahmen dieser Dissertation wurde geprüft, welchen Verlauf die kognitiven Leistungen von Patienten nach der operativen Resektion eines intrakraniellen Meningeoms nahmen und ob hierbei Unterschiede zwischen den Personen bestanden, die eine anschließende Rehabilitation absolvierten, sowie jenen, die keine weiteren Maßnahmen erhielten.
Mit der ersten Hypothese wurde angenommen, dass Patienten ohne Rehabilitation drei Monate nach der Operation ihre kognitiven Fähigkeiten im Vergleich zu einer Woche nach dem Eingriff verbessern. Dies konnte nicht eindeutig bestätigt werden, da eine Steigerung der Leistungen in dieser Patientengruppe nur in fünf der sechzehn Teilgebiete erreicht wurde. Die zweite Hypothese basierte auf der Annahme, dass Patienten mit einer Rehabilitationsmaßnahme Leistungssteigerungen in den getesteten Gebieten zeigten. Der Vergleich fand eine Woche nach dem operativen Eingriff und drei Monate nach der Operation statt. Diese Hypothese kann durch die vorliegenden Ergebnisse im Rahmen der Konzentrationsleistung zumindest eingeschränkt bejaht werden. Es ließen sich zwei signifikante Unterschiede der Ergebnisse der Patienten mit anschließender Rehabilitation beobachten. Hier konnte im ergänzend zur ANOVA berechneten t-Test ein signifikanter Unterschied bei der Leistungssteigerung der Patienten mit anschließender Rehabilitation nachgewiesen werden. Des Weiteren kam es in dieser Patientengruppe zu gesteigerten Leistungen in vierzehn von sechzehn Teilgebieten. Im Falle der dritten Hypothese sollte exploriert werden, ob die Patientengruppe mit anschließender Rehabilitationsmaßnahme im Vergleich zur Patientengruppe ohne weitere Maßnahmen eine größere Leistungssteigerung erfuhr. Dabei konnte eine leichte Tendenz beobachtet werden. Es wurden Verbesserungen der Patientengruppe mit Rehabilitation gegenüber den Patienten ohne weitere Maßnahmen in neun von sechzehn Kategorien beobachtet. Somit lässt sich die Annahme stützen, dass eine postoperative Rehabilitationsmaßnahme sich positiv auf die kognitiven Leistungen bei Meningeom-Patienten auswirkt.
Das Glioblastom (GBM) ist der häufigste maligne primäre Hirntumor im Erwachsenenalter und geht mit einer infausten Prognose einher. Die Standardtherapie bei Erstdiagnose besteht aus Tumorresektion gefolgt von kombinierter Radiochemotherapie mit Temozolomid nach Stupp-Schema. Eine neue Therapieoption stellen die Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) in Form lokal applizierter elektrischer Wechselfelder dar. Mit dem Einsatz der TTFields kann durch Störung der mitotischen Abläufe die Zellproliferation von Tumorzellen gehemmt und dadurch das Gesamtüberleben im Vergleich zur alleinigen Radiochemotherapie nachweislich deutlich verlängert werden. Auch verschiedene Chemotherapeutika, die bereits klinisch eingesetzt werden, greifen in den Ablauf der Mitose ein. So auch die Zytostatika Vincristin (VIN) und Paclitaxel (PTX), die durch einen gegensätzlichen Mechanismus durch Destabilisierung bzw. Stabilisierung von Mikrotubulistrukturen ihre Wirkung entfalten. Die Frage, ob eine Verstärkung dieser Wirkung durch den kombinierten Einsatz mit TTFields erreicht werden kann, wurde in dieser Arbeit an den beiden GBM-Zelllinien U87 und GaMG untersucht.
Zunächst wurde mit dem xCELLigence-Systems über eine Real-Time-Impedanzmessung für diese beiden Chemotherapeutika jeweils die mittlere effektive Dosis (EC50-Wert), bei der ein halbmaximaler Effekt auftritt, spezifisch für jede Zelllinie bestimmt. Diese betrug bei VIN durchschnittlich 200nM für die Zelllinie U87 bzw. 20nM für die Zelllinie GaMG und lag für PTX bei 60nM für beide Zelllinien. Mit diesen Dosierungen wurden die beiden Zelllinien allein und in Kombination mit TTFields über 72h behandelt. Anschließend wurde die Zellproliferation analysiert und mit unbehandelten Tumorzellen verglichen.
Während jeder Behandlungsarm einzeln eine signifikante Wirkung gegenüber der unbehandelten Vergleichsgruppe zeigte, hatte weder die Kombination von TTFields mit VIN noch mit PTX in den untersuchten Dosierungen einen zusätzlichen signifikanten Nutzen.
Es besteht weiterer Forschungsbedarf zum kombinierten Einsatz von TTFields mit anderen Therapieformen.
Current data show that resilience is an important factor in cancer patients’ well-being. We aim to explore the resilience of patients with lower grade glioma (LGG) and the potentially influencing factors. We performed a cross-sectional assessment of adult patients with LGG who were enrolled in the LoG-Glio registry. By phone interview, we administered the following measures: Resilience Scale (RS-13), distress thermometer, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test for visually impaired patients (MoCA-Blind), internalized stigmatization by brain tumor (ISBI), Eastern Cooperative Oncological Group performance status (ECOG), patients’ perspective questionnaire (PPQ) and typical clinical parameters. We calculated correlations and multivariate regression models. Of 74 patients who were assessed, 38% of those showed a low level of resilience. Our results revealed significant correlations of resilience with distress (p < 0.001, −0.49), MOCA (p = 0.003, 0.342), ECOG (p < 0.001, −0.602), stigmatization (p < 0.001, −0.558), pain (p < 0.001, −0.524), and occupation (p = 0.007, 0.329). In multivariate analyses, resilience was negatively associated with elevated ECOG (p = 0.020, β = −0.383) and stigmatization levels (p = 0.008, β = −0.350). Occupation showed a tendency towards a significant association with resilience (p = 0.088, β = −0.254). Overall, low resilience affected more than one third of our cohort. Low functional status is a specific risk factor for low resilience. The relevant influence of stigmatization on resilience is a novel finding for patients suffering from a glioma and should be routinely identified and targeted in clinical routine.