Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (16)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (16)
Document Type
- Journal article (16)
Language
- English (16)
Keywords
- EEG (3)
- ultimatum game (3)
- altruism (2)
- altruistic compensation (2)
- decision-making (2)
- dictator game (2)
- electroencephalography (2)
- emotions (2)
- personality (2)
- Alzheimer’s disease (1)
- Big Five (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- EEG frequency band analysis (1)
- EEG preprocessing (1)
- EEG processing (1)
- FRN (1)
- German translation (1)
- Motivation (1)
- Personality (1)
- altruistic punishment (1)
- anger (1)
- anxiety (1)
- bargaining behavior (1)
- behavior (1)
- big five (1)
- coping (1)
- costly punishment (1)
- decision making (1)
- depression (1)
- early-onset predictors (1)
- emotional influence (1)
- event-related potentials (1)
- event-related potentials-ERP (1)
- expertise in visual imagery (1)
- facial expression (1)
- facial expressions (1)
- fairness evaluation vs. cognitive effort (1)
- fear (1)
- gender influence (1)
- happiness (1)
- loneliness (1)
- measurement invariance (1)
- mental rotation (1)
- midfrontal theta (1)
- midfrontal theta activation (1)
- midline frontal theta band frequency activation (1)
- mild cognitive impairment (1)
- negative affect (1)
- neural network architecture (1)
- parietal alpha band frequency activation (1)
- pen and paper vs. computer role-players (1)
- personality faceaurus (1)
- positive affect (1)
- prosocial behavior (1)
- prosocial tendency measure (1)
- psychology (1)
- reward positivity/FRN/MFN/N2 (1)
- social decision-making (1)
- social distancing (1)
- social dominance (1)
- social isolation (1)
- social status (1)
- standardized analysis method (1)
- third party dictator game (1)
- trait activation in two-stage ultimatum game, (1)
- trust game (1)
- two-stage ultimatum game (1)
- two‑layer feedforward networks (1)
- validation (1)
Institute
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 823881 (6)
We investigated the influence of social status on behavior in a modified dictator game (DG). Since the DG contains an inherent dominance gradient, we examined the relationship between dictator decisions and recipient status, which was operationalized by three social identities and an artificial intelligence (AI). Additionally, we examined the predictive value of social dominance orientation (SDO) on the behavior of dictators toward the different social and non-social hierarchical recipients. A multilevel model analysis showed that recipients with the same status as the dictator benefited the most and the artificial intelligence the least. Furthermore, SDO, regardless of social status, predicted behavior toward recipients in such a way that higher dominance was associated with lower dictator offers. In summary, participants treated other persons of higher and lower status equally, those of equal status better and, above all, an algorithm worst. The large proportion of female participants and the limited variance of SDO should be taken into account with regard to the results of individual differences in SDO.