Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (20)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (20)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (20)
Language
- English (20)
Keywords
- HIV (4)
- antiretroviral therapy (3)
- German Hepatitis C-Registry (2)
- chronic hepatitis C (2)
- graft versus host disease (2)
- hepatitis C virus (2)
- infection (2)
- sofosbuvir (2)
- therapeutic drug monitoring (2)
- AIDS (1)
Institute
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (15)
- Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie (5)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I (5)
- Institut für Pharmazie und Lebensmittelchemie (4)
- Abteilung für Molekulare Innere Medizin (in der Medizinischen Klinik und Poliklinik II) (1)
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (1)
- Institut für Mathematik (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie (ab 2004) (1)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie (1)
- Missionsärztliche Klinik (1)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 241447 (1)
Although sofosbuvir has been approved for patients with genotypes 2/3 (G2/3), many parts of the world still consider pegylated Interferon alpha (P) and ribavirin (R) as standard of care for G2/3. Patients with rapid virological response (RVR) show response rates >80%. However, SVR (sustained virological response) in non-RVR patients is not satisfactory. Longer treatment duration may be required but evidence from prospective trials are lacking. A total of 1006 chronic HCV genotype 2/3 patients treated with P/R were recruited into a German HepNet multicenter screening registry. Of those, only 226 patients were still HCV RNA positive at week 4 (non-RVR). Non-RVR patients with ongoing response after 24 weeks P-2b/R qualified for OPTEX, a randomized trial investigating treatment extension of additional 24 weeks (total 48 weeks, Group A) or additional 12 weeks (total 36 weeks, group B) of 1.5 \(\mu\)g/kg P-2b and 800-1400 mg R. Due to the low number of patients without RVR, the number of 150 anticipated study patients was not met and only 99 non-RVR patients (n=50 Group A, n=49 Group B) could be enrolled into the OPTEX trial. Baseline factors did not differ between groups. Sixteen patients had G2 and 83 patients G3. Based on the ITT (intention-to-treat) analysis, 68% [55%; 81%] in Group A and 57% [43%; 71%] in Group B achieved SVR (p=0.31). The primary endpoint of better SVR rates in Group A compared to a historical control group (SVR 70%) was not met. In conclusion, approximately 23% of G2/3 patients did not achieve RVR in a real world setting. However, subsequent recruitment in a treatment-extension study was difficult. Prolonged therapy beyond 24 weeks did not result in higher SVR compared to a historical control group.