Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (49)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (49)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (49)
Language
- English (49) (remove)
Keywords
- ischemic stroke (10)
- stroke (8)
- atrial fibrillation (4)
- hypertension (3)
- mortality (3)
- Stroke (2)
- cardiovascular risk factors (2)
- chronic kidney disease (2)
- diabetes mellitus (2)
- epidemiology (2)
Institute
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (45)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herzinsuffizienz (DZHI) (15)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I (14)
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik (10)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Thorax-, Herz- u. Thorakale Gefäßchirurgie (6)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie (3)
- Frauenklinik und Poliklinik (2)
- Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie (2)
- Institut für Psychotherapie und Medizinische Psychologie (2)
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie (ehem. Abteilung für Neuroradiologie) (2)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
Background
The guideline recommendation to not measure carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) for cardiovascular risk prediction is based on the assessment of just one single carotid segment. We evaluated whether there is a segment-specific association between different measurement locations of CIMT and cardiovascular risk factors.
Methods
Subjects from the population-based STAAB cohort study comprising subjects aged 30 to 79 years of the general population from Würzburg, Germany, were investigated. CIMT was measured on the far wall of both sides in three different predefined locations: common carotid artery (CCA), bulb, and internal carotid artery (ICA). Diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, and obesity were considered as risk factors. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, odds ratios of risk factors per location were estimated for the endpoint of individual age- and sex-adjusted 75th percentile of CIMT.
Results
2492 subjects were included in the analysis. Segment-specific CIMT was highest in the bulb, followed by CCA, and lowest in the ICA. Dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking were associated with CIMT, but not diabetes and obesity. We observed no relevant segment-specific association between the three different locations and risk factors, except for a possible interaction between smoking and ICA.
Conclusions
As no segment-specific association between cardiovascular risk factors and CIMT became evident, one simple measurement of one location may suffice to assess the cardiovascular risk of an individual.