Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Document Type
- Journal article (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Keywords
- metagenomics (2)
- Darmflora (1)
- Mensch (1)
- Metagenom (1)
- diet (1)
- dog microbiome (1)
- human microbiome (1)
- microbiology (1)
- microbiome (1)
- mouse microbiome (1)
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 686070 (1)
Background
Gut microbes influence their hosts in many ways, in particular by modulating the impact of diet. These effects have been studied most extensively in humans and mice. In this work, we used whole genome metagenomics to investigate the relationship between the gut metagenomes of dogs, humans, mice, and pigs.
Results
We present a dog gut microbiome gene catalog containing 1,247,405 genes (based on 129 metagenomes and a total of 1.9 terabasepairs of sequencing data). Based on this catalog and taxonomic abundance profiling, we show that the dog microbiome is closer to the human microbiome than the microbiome of either pigs or mice. To investigate this similarity in terms of response to dietary changes, we report on a randomized intervention with two diets (high-protein/low-carbohydrate vs. lower protein/higher carbohydrate). We show that diet has a large and reproducible effect on the dog microbiome, independent of breed or sex. Moreover, the responses were in agreement with those observed in previous human studies.
Conclusions
We conclude that findings in dogs may be predictive of human microbiome results. In particular, a novel finding is that overweight or obese dogs experience larger compositional shifts than lean dogs in response to a high-protein diet.
The microbial communities that live inside the human gastrointestinal tract -the human gut
microbiome- are important for host health and wellbeing. Characterizing this new “organ”,
made up of as many cells as the human body itself, has recently become possible through
technological advances. Metagenomics, the high-throughput sequencing of DNA directly from
microbial communities, enables us to take genomic snapshots of thousands of microbes living
together in this complex ecosystem, without the need for isolating and growing them.
Quantifying the composition of the human gut microbiome allows us to investigate its
properties and connect it to host physiology and disease. The wealth of such connections was
unexpected and is probably still underestimated. Due to the fact that most of our dietary as well
as medicinal intake affects the microbiome and that the microbiome itself interacts with our
immune system through a multitude of pathways, many mechanisms have been proposed to
explain the observed correlations, though most have yet to be understood in depth.
An obvious prerequisite to characterizing the microbiome and its interactions with the host is
the accurate quantification of its composition, i.e. determining which microbes are present and
in what numbers they occur. Historically, standard practices have existed for sample handling,
DNA extraction and data analysis for many years. However, these were generally developed for
single microbe cultures and it is not always feasible to implement them in large scale
metagenomic studies. Partly because of this and partly because of the excitement that new
technology brings about, the first metagenomic studies each took the liberty to define their own
approach and protocols. From early meta-analysis of these studies it became clear that the
differences in sample handling, as well as differences in computational approaches, made
comparisons across studies very difficult. This restricts our ability to cross-validate findings of
individual studies and to pool samples from larger cohorts. To address the pressing need for
standardization, we undertook an extensive comparison of 21 different DNA extraction methods
as well as a series of other sample manipulations that affect quantification. We developed a
number of criteria for determining the measurement quality in the absence of a mock
community and used these to propose best practices for sampling, DNA extraction and library
preparation. If these were to be accepted as standards in the field, it would greatly improve
comparability across studies, which would dramatically increase the power of our inferences
and our ability to draw general conclusions about the microbiome.
Most metagenomics studies involve comparisons between microbial communities, for example
between fecal samples from cases and controls. A multitude of approaches have been proposed
to calculate community dissimilarities (beta diversity) and they are often combined with
various preprocessing techniques. Direct metagenomics quantification usually counts
sequencing reads mapped to specific taxonomic units, which can be species, genera, etc. Due to
technology-inherent differences in sampling depth, normalizing counts is necessary, for
instance by dividing each count by the sum of all counts in a sample (i.e. total sum scaling), or by
subsampling. To derive a single value for community (dis-)similarity, multiple distance
measures have been proposed. Although it is theoretically difficult to benchmark these
approaches, we developed a biologically motivated framework in which distance measures can
be evaluated. This highlights the importance of data transformations and their impact on the
measured distances.
Building on our experience with accurate abundance estimation and data preprocessing
techniques, we can now try and understand some of the basic properties of microbial
communities. In 2011, it was proposed that the space of genus level variation of the human gut
microbial community is structured into three basic types, termed enterotypes. These were
described in a multi-country cohort, so as to be independent of geography, age and other host
properties. Operationally defined through a clustering approach, they are “densely populated
areas in a multidimensional space of community composition”(source) and were proposed as a
general stratifier for the human population. Later studies that applied this concept to other
datasets raised concerns about the optimum number of clusters and robustness of the
clustering approach. This heralded a long standing debate about the existence of structure and
the best ways to determine and capture it. Here, we reconsider the concept of enterotypes, in
the context of the vastly increased amounts of available data. We propose a refined framework
in which the different types should be thought of as weak attractors in compositional space and
we try to implement an approach to determining which attractor a sample is closest to. To this
end, we train a classifier on a reference dataset to assign membership to new samples. This way,
enterotypes assignment is no longer dataset dependent and effects due to biased sampling are
minimized. Using a model in which we assume the existence of three enterotypes characterized
by the same driver genera, as originally postulated, we show the relevance of this stratification
and propose it to be used in a clinical setting as a potential marker for disease development.
Moreover, we believe that these attractors underline different rules of community assembly and
we recommend they be accounted for when analyzing gut microbiome samples.
While enterotypes describe structure in the community at genus level, metagenomic sequencing
can in principle achieve single-nucleotide resolution, allowing us to identify single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) and other genomic variants in the gut microbiome. Analysis
methodology for this level of resolution has only recently been developed and little exploration
has been done to date. Assessing SNPs in a large, multinational cohort, we discovered that the
landscape of genomic variation seems highly structured even beyond species resolution,
indicating that clearly distinguishable subspecies are prevalent among gut microbes. In several
cases, these subspecies exhibit geo-stratification, with some subspecies only found in the
Chinese population. Generally however, they present only minor dispersion limitations and are
seen across most of our study populations. Within one individual, one subspecies is commonly
found to dominate and only rarely are several subspecies observed to co-occur in the same
ecosystem. Analysis of longitudinal data indicates that the dominant subspecies remains stable
over periods of more than three years. When interrogating their functional properties we find
many differences, with specific ones appearing relevant to the host. For example, we identify a
subspecies of E. rectale that is lacking the flagellum operon and find its presence to be
significantly associated with lower body mass index and lower insulin resistance of their hosts;
it also correlates with higher microbial community diversity. These associations could not be
seen at the species level (where multiple subspecies are convoluted), which illustrates the
importance of this increased resolution for a more comprehensive understanding of microbial
interactions within the microbiome and with the host.
Taken together, our results provide a rigorous basis for performing comparative metagenomics
of the human gut, encompassing recommendations for both experimental sample processing
and computational analysis. We furthermore refine the concept of community stratification into
enterotypes, develop a reference-based approach for enterotype assignment and provide
compelling evidence for their relevance. Lastly, by harnessing the full resolution of
metagenomics, we discover a highly structured genomic variation landscape below the
microbial species level and identify common subspecies of the human gut microbiome. By
developing these high-precision metagenomics analysis tools, we thus hope to contribute to a
greatly improved understanding of the properties and dynamics of the human gut microbiome.