Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Year of publication
- 2007 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Keywords
- Antigenpräsentation (2) (remove)
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is an infectious disease that is endemic especially in tropical and desert regions with an incidence of 1.5 million cases per year and a prevalence of 12 million people infected worldwide. The infection can be caused by the intracellular parasite Leishmania major. The disease has been studied extensively in the murine model. It has become apparent that the induction of a class of interferon (IFN)--producing CD4+ T helper cells (TH1 cells) that activate macrophages to kill the parasites they harbor is desicive for the establishment of immunity. The redirection of the host’s immune response towards a protective TH1 phenotype will also be the key to an effective vaccine. Dendritic cells (DC) loaded with leishmanial antigens ex vivo were lately described as vaccines against L. major infections. One single recombinant Leishmania antigen, LeIF (Leishmania homologue of eukaryotic ribosomal initiation factor 4a), which was identified as a protein that stimulates DC to secrete interleukin (IL)-12 and discussed as a pattern-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), was found to mediate a protective TH1-dependent effect when used for pulsing of DC. The application of recombinant proteins is tied to many disadvantages, which is why other methods of antigen administration have been developed. RNA electroporation of DC has recently emerged from tumor research as a safe and versatile method of antigen delivery, by which a large number of RNA molecules encoding a specific antigen gains access to the cytosol of DC by an electrical impulse. The present study describes, for the first time, transfection of DC with RNA encoding a molecularly defined parasite antigen. Initially, a standardized protocol for RNA transfection was established, using the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) as reporter antigen. EGFP-RNA was well translatable in an in vitro translation system, and both a DC cell line (fetal skin-derived DC; FSDC) and murine primary bone marrow-derived DC (BMDC) could be transfected efficiently, with a yield of up to 90% and 75%, respectively. In both cell types, maximal transfection efficiency was attained with 20 µg RNA and could not be further increased with larger amounts of RNA. The level of antigen expression, measured as the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) by flow cytometry, was directly proportional to the amount of RNA used for transfection. In FSDC, transfection efficiency and MFI were generally higher than in BMDC when the same amounts of RNA were used. Furthermore, the kinetics was shown to be sensitive to treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS): the expression peak was higher and was reached sooner, followed by a more rapid decline. In transfection experiments with LeIF, two variants of LeIF-RNA were used: LeIF(fl)-RNA, encoding the complete LeIF sequence, and LeIF(226)-RNA, encoding only the aminoterminal half of the LeIF sequence (226 amino acids), the immunogenic part of LeIF. Only LeIF(fl) was detectable by Western Blot in whole cell lysates of BMDC after LeIF(fl)-RNA transfection, whereas LeIF(226) could never be detected in LeIF(226)-transfected BMDC. However, as both constructs were well translatable in a cell-free system, the failure to detect LeIF(226) in BMDC lysates did not represent a failure in RNA translation, but rather a rapid antigen degradation. It was therefore expected that LeIF(226)-transfected BMDC should nevertheless be able to present LeIF(226)-derived antigenic peptides to T cells from BALB/c mice primed with recombinant LeIF (rLeIF). This hypothesis was confirmed by measuring IFN- production in BMDC-T cell co-incubation assays, showing that rLeIF-pulsed, LeIF(226)- and LeIF(fl)-transfected day 7 BMDC did indeed activate T cells from LeIF-immunized mice in an antigen-specific manner. In contrast, IL-4 was not produced, which was consistent with the fact that T cells found in lymph nodes from LeIF-primed mice are primarily of the TH1 type. In the supernatants of LeIF-transfected BMDC cultures, in contrast to rLeIF-pulsed BMDC, the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12 were not detected. This effect was not due to the electroporation procedure, as cytokine production by BMDC electroporated with rLeIF was only partially impaired. Also, the expression levels of CD86 were lower upon LeIF transfection than after pulsing with rLeIF. Thus, LeIF transfection did not induce maturation of DC. In conclusion, LeIF-transfected BMDC may have acted as semi-mature antigen-specific tolerance inducers, with regulatory T cells as responders. The effect of LeIF transfection on the immunostimulatory capacity of BMDC was not significantly increased when day 8 or 9 BMDC were used. However, day 8, and even more day 9 BMDC pulsed with rLeIF mounted a vigorous T cell response. Day 9 BMDC were able to activate naïve T cells. In conclusion, before a strong T cell response against LeIF can be induced, DC need to – besides presenting antigen and expressing co-stimulatory molecules – exhibit a susceptibility to the innate signaling molecule LeIF which is linked to their maturation age. This third signal is provided by extracellular rLeIF, but it is not conveyed – or is suppressed – by intracellular LeIF after LeIF-RNA transfection. Furthermore, electroporation of rLeIF abrogated IL-12 production by BMDC completely, the production of IL-1 was reduced with higher antigen doses, and the production of IL-10 was partially increased. The IL-6 production was unaffected. This altered cytokine profile suggests that LeIF as a PAMP might have a bipartite nature: besides exhibiting the capacity to stimulate IL-12 production upon extracellular presence, thereby enhancing host resistance against L. major, LeIF could also contribute to parasitic host evasion mechanisms from intracellular compartments of DC, possibly by interfering with mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathways. Thus, the adjuvant properties of LeIF depend both on its mode of delivery (transfection with RNA vs. pulsing with the recombinant protein) and the targeted compartment (extra- vs. intracellular). From this work, it can be summarized that BMDC are well transfectable with a parasite antigen. The antigen is processed and presented, but it is not recognized as a PAMP by DC. Hence, transfection with antigen-encoding mRNA by itself does not convey all necessary signals for the elicitation of a potent immune response.
Die endogene Präsentation von intrazellulären Antigenen auf Major-Histokompatibilitätskomplex Klasse-II (MHC-II) -Molekülen ist von entscheidender Bedeutung für eine Reihe von immunologischen Prozessen. Die mechanistischen Grundlagen dieses Präsentationsweges sind aber noch weitgehend unverstanden. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, einen Beitrag zum molekularen Verständnis der Abläufe zu leisten, die an der endogenen Präsentation nukleärer Antigene auf MHC-II-Molekülen beteiligt sind. Dazu sollte am Beispiel des nukleär lokalisierten Modellantigens Neomycin-Phosphotransferase II (NucNeoR) sowie des viralen Kernantigens Epstein-Barr-virus nuclear antigen 3C (EBNA3C) und entsprechender antigenspezifischer MHC-II-restringierter CD4+ T-Zellen die verantwortlichen Präsentationswege in professionell und nicht-professionell antigenpräsentierenden Zellen untersucht werden. In beiden Zellsystemen wurde NucNeoR über einen endogenen Präsentationsweg und nicht über die Freisetzung und Wiederaufnahme als exogenes Protein auf MHC-II-Molekülen präsentiert. Durch die Verwendung chemischer Inhibitoren konnte eine Beteiligung der Autophagie an der endogenen Antigenpräsentation nachgewiesen werden. Da Autophagie ausschließlich im Zytoplasma stattfindet, wurde nach möglichen Eintrittspforten für nukleäre Proteine in diesen Abbauweg gesucht. Für die Autophagie-abhängige Präsentation von NucNeoR war weder ein CRM1-vermittelter aktiver Export des Antigens aus dem Kern ins Zytoplasma, noch eine Auflösung der Kernmembran im Rahmen der Zellteilung und der dadurch bedingten Durchmischung nukleärer und zytoplasmatischer Bestandteile notwendig. Mit Hilfe eines konditionalen Antigenexpressionsystems und der Auftrennung antigenexprimierender Zellen nach Zellzyklusphasen konnte eine verstärkte Antigenpräsentation in der G1/0-Phase nachgewiesen werden, die mit fortschreitendem Zellzyklus immer mehr abnahm. Die Antigenpräsentation korrelierte dabei mit der ebenfalls im Laufe des Zellzyklus abnehmenden Transkriptions- bzw. Translationsrate des Antigens, aber nicht mit der absoluten Menge an Antigen in den Zellen. Bei abgeschalteter Antigentranskription dagegen korrelierte die Antigenpräsentation mit der MHC-II-Oberflächenexpression, die von der G1/0- bis hin zur G2/M-Phase kontinuierlich zunahm. Eine ähnliche Korrelation von Antigentranskription/ Antigentranslation und Autophagie-abhängiger Antigenpräsentation wurde auch für EBNA3C und die zytoplasmatisch lokalisierte NeoR-Variante beobachtet. Diese Ergebnisse identifizieren die Autophagie-abhängige Präsentation neusynthetisierter Proteine als den verantwortlichen molekularen Mechanismus für die endogene Präsentation der untersuchten nukleären Antigene auf MHC-II-Molekülen. Durch die Kopplung von Translation und autophagischem Abbau erlangen Proteine unabhängig von ihrer subzellulären Lokalisation Zugang zu diesem Präsentationsweg und erweitern so das Spektrum der intrazellulären Antigene, die einer CD4+ T-Zellüberwachung unterliegen.