Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (37) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (37)
Year of publication
- 2020 (37) (remove)
Document Type
- Journal article (24)
- Doctoral Thesis (12)
- Preprint (1)
Keywords
- Sozialangst (2)
- Vorschulkind (2)
- decision-making (2)
- tool use (2)
- Affekt (1)
- Angst (1)
- Angststörung (1)
- Animal behavior (1)
- Aufmerksamkeit (1)
- Augenbewegung (1)
Institute
- Institut für Psychologie (37) (remove)
Sharing stories has become increasingly popular as a means to foster young children’s vocabulary development and to target early vocabulary gaps between disadvantaged children and their better-equipped peers. Although, in general, the beneficial effects of story interventions have been demonstrated (Marulis & Neuman, 2010, 2013), many factors possibly moderating those effects – including method of story delivery as well as questioning style – merit further examination (R. L. Walsh & Hodge, 2018).
The aim of the present doctoral thesis was to test predictions from different theories on methods of story delivery and questioning styles regarding their influence on children’s vocabulary learning from listening to stories. Method of story delivery refers to the general way of how stories can be conveyed, with reading aloud and free-telling of stories (i.e., the narrator telling stories without reading from text) representing different approaches that are assumed to differ regarding narrator behavior and linguistic complexity. Questioning styles refer to different combinations of questions’ cognitive demand level (low vs. high vs. scaffolding-like increasing from low to high) and/or placement (within the story vs. after the story) during story sessions.
In the present doctoral thesis, the first two studies (Studies 1 and 2) compared reading aloud and free-telling of stories as different methods of story delivery. Study 1 consisted of two experiments utilizing a within-subjects design with 3- to 6-year-old preschool children (Nexperiment1 = 83; Nexperiment2 = 48) listening to stories once either presented read aloud or freely told. Study 2 extended the first study by examining effects on story comprehension and additionally including audiotape versions of both story-delivery methods as experimental conditions, which allowed separating narrator behavior and linguistic complexity. With the second study being conducted as a between-subjects design, 4- to 6-year-old preschool children (N = 60) heard each of the stories twice, but listened only to one type of story delivery. The results of Study 1 indicated that no differences between methods of story delivery regarding word learning and child engagement were observable when narrator behavior in terms of eye contact and gesticulation was similar. However in Study 2, when free-telling was operationalized in a more naturalistic way, marked by higher rates of eye contact and gesticulation, it resulted in better child engagement, greater vocabulary learning, and better story comprehension than reading aloud. In contrast, as indicated by both studies, differences in linguistic complexity had no short-term impact on learning and comprehension. The studies, however, could not isolate the influence of eye contact versus gesture usage and could not distinguish between different types of gestures.
The second set of studies (Studies 3 and 4) contrasted the effects of different types of question demand level (low vs. high vs. scaffolding-like increasing from low to high) and placement (within the story vs. after the story) and examined potential interactions with children’s cognitive skills. In one-to-one reading sessions (Study 3; N = 86) or small-group reading sessions (Study 4; N = 91) 4- to 6-year-old preschool children heard stories three times marked by different types of question demand level and placement or simply read-aloud without questions. The adult narrators encouraged the children to reflect on and answer questions (Study 1) and to give feedback on other children’s comments (Study 2), but in both studies, to ensure fidelity of the experimental conditions, the adult narrators did not provide corrective feedback or elaborate on the children’s answers. Results on measures of different facets of word learning indicated that asking questions resulted in better vocabulary learning than simply reading the stories aloud. However, in contrast to proposed hypotheses and across both studies, different types of question demand level and placement did not exert differential effects and they did not interact with children’s general vocabulary knowledge or memory skills. Thus, both studies suggest that those two types of questions features have no impact on children’s vocabulary learning, if questions are not followed up by narrator feedback and elaborations. However, whether different types of question placement and demand level produce differential learning gains through adult-child discussion following different questioning styles has still to be determined.
Taken together, the four studies of the present doctoral thesis underline the central role that adults play for successful story sessions with young children not only for engaging children in the story but also for extending and for correcting their utterances. Although the presented studies extend existing knowledge about methods of story delivery and questioning styles during story sessions, further research needs to examine the impact of questioning styles on word learning through subsequent adult-child discussion and to gain a better understanding of the role of nonverbal narrator behavior during story delivery.
Phonologische Bewusstheit stellt die Kompetenz dar, Sprache in kleinere Einheiten wie einzelne Silben und Phoneme untergliedern zu können. Sie ist damit eine wichtige Vorläuferfertigkeit für den Schriftspracherwerb.
Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht die Entwicklung der phonologischen Bewusstheit während des letzten Kindergartenjahres. Zum einen werden die faktorielle Struktur und die Messinvarianz der phonologischen Bewusstheit im Verlauf des letzten Kindergartenjahres analysiert. Als zweiter Aspekt werden die wechselseitigen Zusammenhänge der phonologischen Bewusstheit mit weiteren phonologischen, frühen schriftsprachlichen und sprachlichen Kompetenzen im Vorschulalter untersucht. Der dritte Aspekt bezieht sich auf die institutionelle Förderung phonologischer Bewusstheit bei Vorschulkindern im Kindergarten. Hier werden die Effekte einer expliziten Förderung durch das Trainingsprogramm „Hören, lauschen, lernen“ (Küspert & Schneider, 2018) und einer impliziten Förderung im Kindergartenalltag sowie inzidentelle Einflüsse durch Erwartungseffekte untersucht.
Zur Untersuchung der Fragestellungen wurde ein längsschnittliches Design mit zwei Messzeitpunkten zu Beginn und Ende des letzten Kindergartenjahres verwendet. Die Stichprobe umfasste 390 Vorschulkinder. Für die statistischen Analysen wurden im Wesentlichen Strukturgleichungsmodelle verwendet.
Die Ergebnisse zur Struktur der phonologischen Bewusstheit zeigten Schwierigkeiten bei der längsschnittlichen Abbildung des Konstrukts im Vorschulalter. Da die Tests zur Erfassung der phonologischen Bewusstheit im weiteren Sinne (auf Reim- und Silbenebene) Deckeneffekte aufwiesen und sich im Vorschulalter insbesondere die phonologische Bewusstheit im engeren Sinne (auf Phonemebene) entwickelt, wurde das latente Konstrukt der phonologischen Bewusstheit im Weiteren ausschließlich durch Messverfahren zur Erfassung der phonologischen Bewusstheit im engeren Sinne modelliert. Zudem ließ sich lediglich schwache Messinvarianz etablieren, sodass die Befunde auf einen qualitativen Wandel des Konstrukts während des letzten Kindergartenjahres hindeuten.
Die Befunde zu Zusammenhängen der phonologischen Bewusstheit mit weiteren phonologischen, frühen schriftsprachlichen und sprachlichen Kompetenzen ergaben komplexe wechselseitige Effekte. Die phonologische Bewusstheit sagte dabei die Entwicklung früher schriftsprachlicher Kompetenzen vorher, während sich die Entwicklung der phonologischen Bewusstheit selbst auch durch grammatikalische Kompetenzen erklären ließ.
Bei den Analysen zur Förderung der phonologischen Bewusstheit im Vorschulalter war insbesondere die explizite Förderung durch „Hören, lauschen, lernen“ (Küspert & Schneider, 2018) effektiv. Für die Effektivität des Programms waren zudem die Implementationsbedingungen im Kindergarten relevant. Hier erwies sich vor allem eine vorherige Schulung der Erzieher(innen) als positiv sowie auch eine Abweichung vom Manual in organisatorischer Hinsicht, sodass das Training nicht täglich, sondern mehrmals pro Woche in größeren Abschnitten stattfand. Auf die implizite Förderung der phonologischen Bewusstheit konnte lediglich indirekt über das Wissen der Erzieher(innen) über Sprach- und frühe Schriftsprachförderung geschlossen werden. Das Wissen der Erzieher(innen) über die Förderung phonologischer Bewusstheit war dabei nicht von Bedeutung für die Kompetenzentwicklung der Kinder. Stattdessen wirkte sich das Wissen über sprachliche Fördermaßnahmen, insbesondere bezüglich Maßnahmen bei Aussprachstörungen, günstig auf die Entwicklung der phonologischen Bewusstheit aus. Neben Effekten einer expliziten und impliziten Förderung der phonologischen Bewusstheit waren auch inzidentelle Effekte aufgrund der Urteile der Erzieher(innen) über die Kompetenzen der Kinder nachweisbar. Auch hier wirkten sich die Einschätzungen der sprachlichen Kompetenzen in den Bereichen Aussprache, Wortschatz und Grammatik auf die Entwicklung der phonologischen Bewusstheit aus, während die Einschätzung der phonologischen Bewusstheit selbst durch die Erzieher(innen) die weitere Entwicklung nicht vorhersagen konnte.
Insgesamt sprechen die Befunde für komplexe Zusammenhänge der phonologischen Bewusstheit mit weiteren phonologischen, frühen schriftsprachlichen und sprachlichen Kompetenzen, die auch bei der Konzeption von Fördermaßnahmen berücksichtigt werden sollten.
Objectives
Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) is a promising treatment for patients with fear of driving. The present pilot study is the first one focusing on behavioral effects of VRET on patients with fear of driving as measured by a post-treatment driving test in real traffic.
Methods
The therapy followed a standardized manual including psychotherapeutic and medical examination, two preparative psychotherapy sessions, five virtual reality exposure sessions, a final behavioral avoidance test (BAT) in real traffic, a closing session, and two follow-up phone assessments after six and twelve weeks. VRE was conducted in a driving simulator with a fully equipped mockup. The exposure scenarios were individually tailored to the patients’ anxiety hierarchy. A total of 14 patients were treated. Parameters on the verbal, behavioral and physiological level were assessed.
Results
The treatment was helpful to overcome driving fear and avoidance. In the final BAT, all patients mastered driving tasks they had avoided before, 71% showed an adequate driving behavior as assessed by the driving instructor, and 93% could maintain their treatment success until the second follow-up phone call. Further analyses suggest that treatment reduces avoidance behavior as well as symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder as measured by standardized questionnaires (Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire: p < .10, PTSD Symptom Scale–Self Report: p < .05).
Conclusions
VRET in driving simulation is very promising to treat driving fear. Further research with randomized controlled trials is needed to verify efficacy. Moreover, simulators with lower configuration stages should be tested for a broad availability in psychotherapy.
Are there emotional reactions towards social robots? Could you love a robot? Or, put the other way round: Could you mistreat a robot, tear it apart and sell it? Media reports people honoring military robots with funerals, mourning the “death” of a robotic dog, and granting the humanoid robot Sophia citizenship. But how profound are these reactions? Three experiments take a closer look on emotional reactions towards social robots by investigating the subjective experience of people as well as the motor expressive level. Contexts of varying degrees of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) sketch a nuanced picture of emotions towards social robots that encompass conscious as well as unconscious reactions. The findings advance the understanding of affective experiences in HRI. It also turns the initial question into: Can emotional reactions towards social robots even be avoided?
Learning with digital media has become a substantial part of formal and informal educational processes and is gaining more and more importance. Technological progress has brought overwhelming opportunities for learners, but challenges them at the same time. Learners have to regulate their learning process to a much greater extent than in traditional learning situations in which teachers support them through external regulation. This means that learners must plan their learning process themselves, apply appropriate learning strategies, monitor, control and evaluate it. These requirements are taken into account in various models of self-regulated learning (SRL). Although the roots of research on SRL go back to the 1980s, the measurement and adequate support of SRL in technology-enhanced learning environments is still not solved in a satisfactory way. An important obstacle are the data sources used to operationalize SRL processes. In order to support SRL in adaptive learning systems and to validate theoretical models, instruments are needed which meet the classical quality criteria and also fulfil additional requirements. Suitable data channels must be measurable "online", i.e., they must be available in real time during learning for analyses or the individual adaptation of interventions. Researchers no longer only have an interest in the final results of questionnaires or tasks, but also need to examine process data from interactions between learners and learning environments in order to advance the development of theories and interventions. In addition, data sources should not be obtrusive so that the learning process is not interrupted or disturbed. Measurements of physiological data, for example, require learners to wear measuring devices. Moreover, measurements should not be reactive. This means that other variables such as learning outcomes should not be influenced by the measurement. Different data sources that are already used to study and support SRL processes, such as protocols on thinking aloud, screen recording, eye tracking, log files, video observations or physiological sensors, meet these criteria to varying degrees. One data channel that has received little attention in research on educational psychology, but is non-obtrusive, non-reactive, objective and available online, is the detailed, timely high-resolution data on observable interactions of learners in online learning environments. This data channel is introduced in this thesis as "peripheral data". It records both the content of learning environments as context, and related actions of learners triggered by mouse and keyboard, as well as the reactions of learning environments, such as structural or content changes. Although the above criteria for the use of the data are met, it is unclear whether this data can be interpreted reliably and validly with regard to relevant variables and behavior.
Therefore, the aim of this dissertation is to examine this data channel from the perspective of SRL and thus further close the existing research gap. One development project and four research projects were carried out and documented in this thesis.
Multitasking, defined as performing more than one task at a time, typically yields performance decrements, for instance, in processing speed and accuracy. These performance costs are often distributed asymmetrically among the involved tasks. Under suitable conditions, this can be interpreted as a marker for prioritization of one task – the one that suffers less – over the other. One source of such task prioritization is based on the use of different effector systems (e.g., oculomotor system, vocal tract, limbs) and their characteristics. The present work explores such effector system-based task prioritization by examining to which extent associated effector systems determine which task is processed with higher priority in multitasking situations. Thus, three different paradigms are used, namely the simultaneous (stimulus) onset paradigm, the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, and the task switching paradigm. These paradigms invoke situations in which two (in the present studies basic spatial decision) tasks are a) initiated at exactly the same time, b) initiated with a short varying temporal distance (but still temporally overlapping), or c) in which tasks alternate randomly (without temporal overlap). The results allow for three major conclusions: 1. The assumption of effector system-based task prioritization according to an ordinal pattern (oculomotor > pedal > vocal > manual, indicating decreasing prioritization) is supported by the observed data in the simultaneous onset paradigm. This data pattern cannot be explained by a rigid “first come, first served” task scheduling principle. 2. The data from the PRP paradigm confirmed the assumption of vocal-over-manual prioritization and showed that classic PRP effects (as a marker for task order-based prioritization) can be modulated by effector system characteristics. 3. The mere cognitive representation of task sets (that must be held active to switch between them) differing in effector systems without an actual temporal overlap in task processing, however, is not sufficient to elicit the same effector system prioritization phenomena observed for overlapping tasks. In summary, the insights obtained by the present work support the assumptions of parallel central task processing and resource sharing among tasks, as opposed to exclusively serial processing of central processing stages. Moreover, they indicate that effector systems are a crucial factor in multitasking and suggest an integration of corresponding weighting parameters in existing dual-task control frameworks.
Maladaptive coping mechanisms influence health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of individuals facing acute and chronic stress. Trait emotional intelligence (EI) may provide a protective shield against the debilitating effects of maladaptive coping thus contributing to maintained HRQoL. Low trait EI, on the other hand, may predispose individuals to apply maladaptive coping, consequently resulting in lower HRQoL. The current research is comprised of two studies. Study 1 was designed to investigate the protective effects of trait EI and its utility for efficient coping in dealing with the stress caused by chronic heart failure (CHF) in a cross-cultural setting (Pakistan vs Germany). N = 200 CHF patients were recruited at cardiology institutes of Multan, Pakistan and Würzburg as well as Brandenburg, Germany. Path analysis confirmed the expected relation between low trait EI and low HRQoL and revealed that this association was mediated by maladaptive metacognitions and negative coping strategies in Pakistani but not German CHF patients. Interestingly, also the specific coping strategies were culture-specific. The Pakistani sample considered religious coping to be highly important, whereas the German sample was focused on adopting a healthy lifestyle such as doing exercise. These findings are in line with cultural characteristics suggesting that German CHF patients have an internal locus of control as compared to an external locus of control in Pakistani CHF patients. Finally, the findings from study 1 corroborate the culture-independent validity of the metacognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder.
In addition to low trait EI, high interoception accuracy (IA) may predispose individuals to interpret cardiac symptoms as threatening, thus leading to anxiety. To examine this proposition, Study 2 compared individuals with high vs low IA in dealing with a psychosocial stressor (public speaking) in an experimental lab study. In addition, a novel physiological intervention named transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (t-VNS) and cognitive reappraisal (CR) were applied during and after the anticipation of the speech in order to facilitate coping with stress. N= 99 healthy volunteers participated in the study. Results showed interesting descriptive results that only reached trend level. They suggested a tendency of high IA individuals to perceive the situation as more threatening as indicated by increased heart rate and reduced heart rate variability in the high-frequency spectrum as well as high subjective anxiety during anticipation of and actual performance of the speech. This suggests a potential vulnerability of high IA individuals for developing anxiety disorders, specifically social anxiety disorder, in case negative self-focused attention and negative evaluation is applied to the (more prominently perceived) increased cardiac responding during anticipation of and the actual presentation of the public speech. The study did not reveal any significant protective effects of t-VNS and CR.
In summary, the current research suggested that low trait EI and high IA predicted worse psychological adjustment to chronic and acute distress. Low trait EI facilitated maladaptive metacognitive processes resulting in the use of negative coping strategies in Study 1; however, increased IA regarding cardioceptions predicted high physiological arousal in study 2. Finally, the German vs. the Pakistani culture greatly affected the preference for specific coping strategies. These findings have implications for caregivers to provide culture-specific treatments on the one hand. On the other hand, they highlight high IA as a possible vulnerability to be targeted for the prevention of (social) anxiety.