Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Year of publication
- 2014 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Keywords
- Transkriptionsfaktor (3) (remove)
Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a highly aggressive B cell malignancy. Rituximab, a humanized antibody against CD20, in a combination with chemotherapy is a current treatment of choice for B-cell lymphomas including BL. However, certain group of BL patients are resistant to Rituximab therapy. Therefore, alternative treatments targeting survival pathways of BL are needed.
In BL deregulation of MYC expression, together with additional mutations, inhibits differentiation of germinal centre (GC) B cells and drives proliferation of tumor cells. Pro-apoptotic properties of MYC are counteracted through the B-cell receptor (BCR) and phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway to ensure survival of BL cells. In normal B-cells BCR triggering activates both NF-κB and NFAT-dependent survival signals. Since BL cells do not exhibit constitutive NF-κB activity, we hypothesized that anti-apoptotic NFATc1A isoform might provide a major survival signal for BL cells.
We show that NFATc1 is constitutively expressed in nuclei of BL, in BL cell lines and in Eµ-Myc–induced B cell lymphoma (BCL) cells. Nuclear residence of NFATc1 in these entities depends on intracellular Ca2+ levels but is largely insensitive to cyclosporine A (CsA) treatment and therefore independent from calcineurine (CN) activity. The protein/protein interaction between the regulatory domain of NFATc1 and DNA binding domain of BCL6 likely contributes to sustained nuclear residence of NFATc1 and to the regulation of proposed NFATc1-MYC-BCL6-PRDM1 network in B-cell lymphomas.
Our data revealed lack of strict correlation between the expression of six NFATc1 isoforms in different BL-related entities suggesting that both NFATc1/alphaA and -betaA isoforms provide survival functions and that NFATc1alpha/betaB and -alpha/betaC isoforms either do not possess pro-apoptotic properties in BL cells or these properties are counterbalanced. In addition, we show that in BL entities expression of NFATc1 protein is largely regulated at post-transcriptional level, including MYC dependent increase of protein stability.
Functionally we show that conditional inactivation of Nfatc1 gene in Eµ-Myc mice prevents development of BCL tumors with mature B cell immunophenotype (IgD+). Loss of NFATc1 expression in BCL cells ex vivo results in apoptosis of tumor cells.
Together our results identify NFATc1 as an important survival factor in BL cells and, hence, as a promising target for alternative therapeutic strategies for BL.
In this work we wanted to investigate the role of NFATc1 in lymphocyte physiology and in pathological conditions (eg. psoriasis). NFATc1 is part of the signal transduction
pathways that regulates B cells activation and function. NFATc1 has different isoforms that are due to different promoters (P1 and P2), polyadenylation and alternative splicing. Moreover, we tried to elucidate the points of interactions between the NFAT and the NF-κB pathways in
activated B-cell fate. NFAT and NF-κB factors share several properties, such as a similar mode of induction and architecture in their DNA binding domain. We used mice which over-express a constitutive active version of NFATc1/α in their B cells with -or without- an ablated IRF4. IRF4 inhibits cell cycle progression of germinal center B cell-derived Burkitt’s lymphoma cells and
induces terminal differentiation toward plasma cells. Our experiments showed that a ‘double hit’ in factors affecting B cell activation (NFATc1 in this case) and late B cell Differentiation (IRF4 in this case) alter the development of the B cells, lead to increase in their numbers and increase in stimulation induced proliferation. Therefore, the overall picture indicates a link between these 2 genes and probable carcinogenic alterations that may occur in B cells.
We also show that in splenic B cells, c-Rel (of the NF-κB canonical pathway) Support the induction of NFATc1/αA through BCR signals. We also found evidence that the lack of NFATc1 affects the expression of Rel-B (of the NF-κB non-canonical pathway). These data suggest a tight interplay between NFATc1 and NF-κB in B cells, influencing the competence of B cells and their functions in peripheral tissues.
We also used IMQ-induced psoriasis-like inflammation on mice which either lack NFATc1 from B cell. Psoriasis is a systemic chronic immunological disease characterized
primarily by abnormal accelerated proliferation of the skin keratinocytes. In psoriasis, the precipitating event leads to immune cell activation. Our experiments showed that NFATc1 is needed for the development of psoriasis. It also showed that IL-10 is the link that enables NFAT
from altering the B cell compartment (eg Bregs) in order to affect inflammation. The important role of B cell in psoriasis is supported by the flared up psoriasis-like inflammation in mice that lack B cells. Bregs is a special type of B cells that regulate other B cells and T cells; tuning the immunological response through immunomodulatory cytokines.
The Notch signaling pathway is crucial for mammalian heart development. It controls cell-fate decisions, coordinates patterning processes and regulates proliferation and differentiation. Critical Notch effectors are Hey bHLH transcription factors (TF) that are expressed in atrial (Hey1) and ventricular (Hey2) cardiomyocytes (CM) and in the developing endocardium (Hey1/2/L). The importance of Hey proteins for cardiac development is demonstrated by knockout (KO) mice, which suffer from lethal cardiac defects, such as ventricular septum defects (VSD), valve defects and cardiomyopathy. Despite this clear functional relevance, little is known about Hey downstream targets in the heart and the molecular mechanism by which they are regulated.
Here, I use a cell culture system with inducible Hey1, Hey2 or HeyL expression to study Hey target gene regulation in HEK293 cells, in murine embryonic stem cells (ESC) and in ESC derived CM. In HEK293 cells, I could show that genome wide binding sites largely overlap between all three Hey proteins, but HeyL has many additional binding sites that are not bound by Hey1 or Hey2. Shared binding sites are located close to transcription start sites (TSS) where Hey proteins preferentially bind to canonical E boxes, although more loosely defined modes of binding exist. Additional sites only bound by HeyL are more scattered across the genome. The ability of HeyL to bind these sites depends on the C-terminal part of the protein. Although there are genes which are differently regulated by HeyL, it is unclear whether this regulation results from binding of additional sites by HeyL.
Additionally, Hey target gene regulation was studied in ESC and differentiated CM, which are more relevant for the observed cardiac phenotypes. ESC derived CM contract in culture and are positive for typical cardiac markers by qRT PCR and staining. According to these markers differentiation is unaffected by prolonged Hey1 or Hey2 overexpression. Regulated genes are largely redundant between Hey1 and Hey2. These are mainly other TF involved in e.g. developmental processes, apoptosis, cell migration and cell cycle. Many target genes are cell type specifically regulated causing a shift in Hey repression of genes involved in cell migration in ESC to repression of genes involved in cell cycle in CM.
The number of Hey binding sites is reduced in CM and HEK293 cells compared to ESC, most likely due to more regions of dense chromatin in differentiated cells. Binding sites are enriched at the proximal promoters of down-regulated genes, compared to up-or non-regulated genes. This indicates that up-regulation primarily results from indirect effects, while down-regulation is the direct results of Hey binding to target promoters. The extent of repression generally correlates with the amount of Hey binding and subsequent recruitment of histone deacetylases (Hdac) to target promoters resulting in histone H3 deacetylation.
However, in CM the repressive effect of Hey binding on a subset of genes can be annulled, likely due to binding of cardiac specific activators like Srf, Nkx2-5 and Gata4. These factors seem not to interfere with Hey binding in CM, but they recruit histone acetylases such as p300 that may counteract Hey mediated histone H3 deacetylation. Such a scenario explains differential regulation of Hey target genes between ESC and CM resulting in gene and cell-type specific regulation.