Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Year of publication
- 2010 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Keywords
- CD1d (2) (remove)
Institute
Analyse der Expression und möglicher signalinduzierender Eigenschaften des CD1d-Moleküls der Ratte
(2010)
Wie MHC Klasse I und II-Moleküle präsentieren CD1d-Moleküle dem TCR Antigene, allerdings Lipide und Glykolipide und nicht Proteinfragmente. Die Entdeckung der massiven TH1- und TH2-Zytokinproduktion von Typ I-NKT-Zellen nach CD1d-vermittelter Erkennung von α-Galactosylceramid, einem aus dem Meeresschwamm gewonnenen Glykosphingolipid, weckte großes Interesse an ihrem immunregulatorischen Potential und ihrem möglichen Nutzen für neue Immun- und Tumortherapien. Um die Funktion und die Bedeutung von CD1d besser zu verstehen, wurden in dieser Arbeit die Expressionslevel der lymphatischen Gewebe der Ratte und der Maus untersucht. Hierfür wurden die neu generierten monoklonalen Antikörper 232 und 58/4 verwendet, die die CD1d-Moleküle von Ratte und Maus binden und so den direkten Vergleich beider Spezies ermöglichen. Sowohl die isolierten Zellen des Thymus und der Milz als auch des Lymphknotens waren in der LEW- und F344-Ratte sowie in der BALB/c-Maus schwach bis stark CD1d positiv. In der LEW-Ratte und in der F344-Ratte wiesen jeweils ca. 18% der Milzzellen eine vergleichsweise erhöhte CD1d-Expression auf. Dabei handelte es sich in erster Linie um Marginalzonen-B-Zellen. Bestimmte Subpopulationen der Dendritischen Zellen und vermutlich Makrophagen stellten die restlichen CD1d stark positiven Populationen dar. Nur ca. 2% der isolierten Zellen der Lymphknoten der LEW-Ratte waren stark CD1d positiv, wohingegen der LEW-Thymus gemäß dem noch geringeren Anteil an APC kaum Zellen mit erhöhter CD1d-Expression enthielt. In der BALB/c-Maus war der Anteil CD1d stark positiver Milzzellen mit 4% deutlich geringer als in der LEW- oder F344-Milz. Abgesehen von MZ-B-Zellen konnten in der Maus kaum Populationen mit starker CD1d-Expression in den verschiedenen Färbungen festgestellt werden. Demnach stellt CD1d sowohl in der Ratte als auch in der Maus einen guten Marker für MZ-B-Zellen dar. Demgegenüber zeigten vereinzelt kleine Populationen der Milz, des Lymphknotens und des Thymus beider Spezies eine verminderte oder gar keine CD1d-Expression. Zur Analyse möglicher signalinduzierender Eigenschaften der verschiedenen Anti- CD1d-Antikörper wurden ihre Effekte auf rCD1d+ Transduktanten und primäre Zellen untersucht. 58/4 konnte im Gegensatz zu 232 spezifisch über Bindung an Ratten- CD1d Zelltod und Aggregatbildung in Tumor-B-Zellen des Menschen und der Maus, aber nicht in Tumor-T-Zellen, induzieren. Der zytoplasmatische Schwanz der CD1d-Moleküle scheint an der Aggregatbildung beteiligt zu sein. Die Bindung von 58/4 oder 232 führte in überlebenden rCD1d+ Raji-Zellen zu einer ähnlich starken Internalisierung der CD1d-Moleküle. Während nach 5-stündiger Inkubation mit 232 und erneuter CD1d-Färbung wieder die vorherige CD1d- Expression festgestellt wurde, konnte nach Inkubation mit 58/4 eine bleibende Herunterregulierung beobachtet werden. Folglich bewirkte 58/4 ein anderes bzw. stärkeres Signal in den Zellen als 232. Diese Beobachtungen stützen die Signaltransduktion als mögliche weitere Funktion der CD1d-Moleküle neben der Antigenpräsentation und definieren die monoklonalen Antikörper 232 und 58/4 als nützliche Werkzeuge für weitere Studien zur Analyse der molekularen Mechanismen der CD1d-vermittelten Signaltransduktion. Das Verständnis solcher Mechanismen bildet wiederum die Grundlage für die Entwicklung neuer Therapien z. B. zur Eliminierung CD1d exprimierender Tumore.
iNKT cells are a population of T cells with unique characteristics. In contrast to most αβ T cells which recognize peptides presented by highly polymorphic MHC molecules, iNKT cells are reactive to glycolipids presented by CD1d, a non-polymorphic MHC-I like molecule. Moreover, whereas MHC-restricted αβ T cells bear highly variable receptors (TCRs) formed after somatic recombination of the V(D)J gene segments, the TCR of iNKT cells is formed by an invariant α chain, which always contains the same gene segments: AV14 and AJ18; and a β chain of limited BV gene usage: BV8S2, BV7 or BV2, in the mouse. This invariant α chain is the reason for which these cells are named “i” and the NK part of their name refers to the expression of receptors typical of natural killer (NK) cells. iNKT cells recognize glycolipids of endogenous and microbial origin. After activation they secrete large amounts of very different cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-4 and thus influence immune responses and pathological conditions. One of the most potent iNKT cell agonists, recognized by the semi-invariant TCR, is the synthetic glycolipid α-Galactosylceramide (α-Gal). iNKT cells can be visualized using CD1d-multimeric complexes loaded with α-Gal and flow cytometry, since this reagent has enough avidity to stain these cells. Interestingly, mouse iNKT cells can be stained with human α-Gal-loaded CD1d oligomers and human iNKT cells can also be visualized with mouse α-Gal-loaded CD1d oligomers, indicating a high degree of conservation of the recognition of α-Gal presented by CD1d through evolution. Previous studies showed that rats have the genes necessary to build semi-invariant TCRs: They have a CD1d homologue; one or two BV8S2 homologues and interestingly, up to ten AV14 gene segments, which are highly conserved when compared to the mouse genes. Importantly, it has been shown at least for two of these AV14 gene segments that they can produce invariant TCRα chains which, when coexpressed with BV8-containing β chains, react to α-Gal presented by rat CD1d. Furthermore, ex vivo stimulation of primary splenocytes with α-Gal results in the secretion of IL-4 and IFN-γ. Surprisingly, rat semi-invariant TCRs do not recognize α-Gal presented by mouse CD1d and accordingly, mouse α-Gal-loaded CD1d tetramers failed to stain a discrete population of rat iNKT cells. Taking all together, despite that strong evidence suggested that iNKT cells are present in the rat, the direct identification of such population and the analysis of CD1d-restricted immune responses were still pending for this species. Hence the work presented in this doctoral thesis was aimed to identify iNKT cells, to analyze their phenotype and also to study the distribution and function of CD1d in the rat. For these purposes, we produced essential reagents which were still lacking such as rat specific anti-CD1d monoclonal antibodies and rat CD1d oligomers. Importantly, two of three anti-rat CD1d monoclonal antibodies (all of them generated in our laboratory before this thesis was initiated) also recognized mouse CD1d and therefore allowed a direct comparison of CD1d expression between rat and mouse. Whereas CD1d distribution in the hematopoietic system was found to be extremely similar between these two species; in non-lymphatic tissues important differences were observed. Interestingly, CD1d protein was detected at not yet described sites such as the rat exocrine pancreas and rat and mouse Paneth cells. These monoclonal antibodies did not only allowed the analysis of CD1d expression, but also the first demonstration of the function of rat CD1d as an antigen presenting molecule, since cytokine release in response to α-Gal was blocked when they were added to ex vivo cultures of rat primary cells. Staining of primary rat iNKT cells (possible now with the newly generated rat CD1d oligomers) revealed interesting similarities with human iNKT cells. First, we observed that rat iNKT cells are only a minority among all NKR-P1A/B positive T cells. Human iNKT cells constitute also a very small proportion of NKR-P1A (CD161) expressing T cells, whereas in mice inbred strains which express NKR-P1C (NK1.1), most of NKRP1C expressing T cells are iNKT cells. Second, the majority of rat iNKT cells are either CD4 or DN and only a small proportion expresses CD8β. These findings are similar to humans and different to mice which lack CD8+ iNKT cells. Third, analysis of various inbred rat strains demonstrated different iNKT cell frequencies which correlated with cytokine secretion after α-Gal stimulation of primary cells. In comparison to mice, iNKT cell numbers are markedly reduced in rats. In F344 rats, inbred rat strain which released the highest cytokine amounts after α-Gal stimulation, approximately 0.25% and 0.1% of total liver and spleen lymphocytes, respectively, are iNKT cells. In contrast, in LEW rats iNKT cells were practically absent and neither IL-4 nor IFN-γ were detected after stimulation of primary cells with α-Gal. Once more, these frequencies are very close to those observed in humans. Last, as reported for human peripheral blood cells, rat iNKT cells could be easily expanded in vitro by adding α-Gal to cultures of intrahepatic lymphocytes, whereas the expansion of mouse iNKT cells was not possible using the same protocol. The presence of a multimember AV14 gene segment family in the rat is an intriguing characteristic. These AV14 gene segments are extremely homologous except in the CDR2α region. Based on the amino acid sequence of this region they have been divided into two different types: Type I and II. A specific tissue distribution of the different types was proposed in the first study where the presence of several AV14 gene segments was described. We also analyzed the AV14 gene segment usage in F344 and LEW inbred rat strains. In F344 rats we found no preferential usage of either AV14 gene segment type in the spleen and the liver but type II AV14 gene segments appeared more frequently in the thymus. In contrast, LEW rats show a preferential usage of type I AV14 gene segments in all three compartments analyzed: Thymus, spleen and liver. Taken all together, the usage of newly generated reagents allowed to gain novel insights into CD1d expression in the rat and in the mouse and to directly identify rat iNKT cells for the first time. The phenotypic and functional analysis of rat iNKT cells revealed numerous similarities with human iNKT cells. These are of special interest, since rats serve to investigate several pathological conditions including models for autoimmune diseases. The possibility now to analyze iNKT cells and CD1d-restricted T cell responses in the rat might help to understand the pathogenesis of such diseases. In addition, the uncomplicated in vitro expansion and culture of rat iNKT cells should facilitate the analysis of the immunomoldulatory capacities of these cells.