Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Keywords
- Antigenpräsentation (2) (remove)
Institute
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is an infectious disease that is endemic especially in tropical and desert regions with an incidence of 1.5 million cases per year and a prevalence of 12 million people infected worldwide. The infection can be caused by the intracellular parasite Leishmania major. The disease has been studied extensively in the murine model. It has become apparent that the induction of a class of interferon (IFN)--producing CD4+ T helper cells (TH1 cells) that activate macrophages to kill the parasites they harbor is desicive for the establishment of immunity. The redirection of the host’s immune response towards a protective TH1 phenotype will also be the key to an effective vaccine. Dendritic cells (DC) loaded with leishmanial antigens ex vivo were lately described as vaccines against L. major infections. One single recombinant Leishmania antigen, LeIF (Leishmania homologue of eukaryotic ribosomal initiation factor 4a), which was identified as a protein that stimulates DC to secrete interleukin (IL)-12 and discussed as a pattern-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), was found to mediate a protective TH1-dependent effect when used for pulsing of DC. The application of recombinant proteins is tied to many disadvantages, which is why other methods of antigen administration have been developed. RNA electroporation of DC has recently emerged from tumor research as a safe and versatile method of antigen delivery, by which a large number of RNA molecules encoding a specific antigen gains access to the cytosol of DC by an electrical impulse. The present study describes, for the first time, transfection of DC with RNA encoding a molecularly defined parasite antigen. Initially, a standardized protocol for RNA transfection was established, using the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) as reporter antigen. EGFP-RNA was well translatable in an in vitro translation system, and both a DC cell line (fetal skin-derived DC; FSDC) and murine primary bone marrow-derived DC (BMDC) could be transfected efficiently, with a yield of up to 90% and 75%, respectively. In both cell types, maximal transfection efficiency was attained with 20 µg RNA and could not be further increased with larger amounts of RNA. The level of antigen expression, measured as the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) by flow cytometry, was directly proportional to the amount of RNA used for transfection. In FSDC, transfection efficiency and MFI were generally higher than in BMDC when the same amounts of RNA were used. Furthermore, the kinetics was shown to be sensitive to treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS): the expression peak was higher and was reached sooner, followed by a more rapid decline. In transfection experiments with LeIF, two variants of LeIF-RNA were used: LeIF(fl)-RNA, encoding the complete LeIF sequence, and LeIF(226)-RNA, encoding only the aminoterminal half of the LeIF sequence (226 amino acids), the immunogenic part of LeIF. Only LeIF(fl) was detectable by Western Blot in whole cell lysates of BMDC after LeIF(fl)-RNA transfection, whereas LeIF(226) could never be detected in LeIF(226)-transfected BMDC. However, as both constructs were well translatable in a cell-free system, the failure to detect LeIF(226) in BMDC lysates did not represent a failure in RNA translation, but rather a rapid antigen degradation. It was therefore expected that LeIF(226)-transfected BMDC should nevertheless be able to present LeIF(226)-derived antigenic peptides to T cells from BALB/c mice primed with recombinant LeIF (rLeIF). This hypothesis was confirmed by measuring IFN- production in BMDC-T cell co-incubation assays, showing that rLeIF-pulsed, LeIF(226)- and LeIF(fl)-transfected day 7 BMDC did indeed activate T cells from LeIF-immunized mice in an antigen-specific manner. In contrast, IL-4 was not produced, which was consistent with the fact that T cells found in lymph nodes from LeIF-primed mice are primarily of the TH1 type. In the supernatants of LeIF-transfected BMDC cultures, in contrast to rLeIF-pulsed BMDC, the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12 were not detected. This effect was not due to the electroporation procedure, as cytokine production by BMDC electroporated with rLeIF was only partially impaired. Also, the expression levels of CD86 were lower upon LeIF transfection than after pulsing with rLeIF. Thus, LeIF transfection did not induce maturation of DC. In conclusion, LeIF-transfected BMDC may have acted as semi-mature antigen-specific tolerance inducers, with regulatory T cells as responders. The effect of LeIF transfection on the immunostimulatory capacity of BMDC was not significantly increased when day 8 or 9 BMDC were used. However, day 8, and even more day 9 BMDC pulsed with rLeIF mounted a vigorous T cell response. Day 9 BMDC were able to activate naïve T cells. In conclusion, before a strong T cell response against LeIF can be induced, DC need to – besides presenting antigen and expressing co-stimulatory molecules – exhibit a susceptibility to the innate signaling molecule LeIF which is linked to their maturation age. This third signal is provided by extracellular rLeIF, but it is not conveyed – or is suppressed – by intracellular LeIF after LeIF-RNA transfection. Furthermore, electroporation of rLeIF abrogated IL-12 production by BMDC completely, the production of IL-1 was reduced with higher antigen doses, and the production of IL-10 was partially increased. The IL-6 production was unaffected. This altered cytokine profile suggests that LeIF as a PAMP might have a bipartite nature: besides exhibiting the capacity to stimulate IL-12 production upon extracellular presence, thereby enhancing host resistance against L. major, LeIF could also contribute to parasitic host evasion mechanisms from intracellular compartments of DC, possibly by interfering with mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathways. Thus, the adjuvant properties of LeIF depend both on its mode of delivery (transfection with RNA vs. pulsing with the recombinant protein) and the targeted compartment (extra- vs. intracellular). From this work, it can be summarized that BMDC are well transfectable with a parasite antigen. The antigen is processed and presented, but it is not recognized as a PAMP by DC. Hence, transfection with antigen-encoding mRNA by itself does not convey all necessary signals for the elicitation of a potent immune response.
Genome-wide association studies revealed CLEC16A as a candidate gene for Type 1 Diabetes and multiple other autoimmune disorders. The function of CLEC16A remains unknown. However, previous work showed that the CLEC16A ortholog ema and the murine Clec16a were both implicated in autophagy, a process partially required for MHC class II loading and antigen presentation. Furthermore, studies could show that autophagy was required in thymic epithelial cells for antigen presentation during T cell selection, suggesting a possible role of CLEC16A in T cell selection in the thymus. Additionally, it was postulated that CLEC16A may function as an expression quantitative trait locus for its neighboring genes and that Clec16a KD was involved in pancreatic islet function and impaired insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis. Prior to this work, Schuster et al. had created a Clec16a KD NOD mouse, which was protected from spontaneous autoimmune diabetes.
For this work it was hypothesized that CLEC16A variation serves as a Type 1 Diabetes risk gene by affecting autophagy in thymic epithelial cells, which modulates antigen presentation and shapes the T cell repertoire. To expand and complement previous findings by Schuster et al., this thesis aimed to investigate how CLEC16A modifies the function of thymic epithelial cells. For this purpose, CLEC16A KD was induced in human cells via RNA interference and autophagy was studied through immunoblotting. Additionally, inflammation of pancreatic tissue in Clec16a KD NOD mice was scored using H.E. stained pancreatic sections. Thymic transplantation experiments were conducted to test whether the effects of Clec16a KD were T cell intrinsic. Also, intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests were performed to study glucose homeostasis in Clec16a KD NOD animals. Finally, using qPCR, gene expression levels of neighboring genes such as Dexi and Socs1 were measured to study Clec16a as an expression quantitative trait locus.
In combination with the findings of Schuster et al., this thesis demonstrates that Clec16a KD reduces the severity of insulitis and protects from onset of spontaneous diabetes in the NOD mouse. Disease protection is conveyed by impaired autophagy in TEC, which leads to altered T cell selection and hyporeactive CD4+ T cells. The effects of Clec16a KD in the NOD mouse are thymus intrinsic. Glucose homeostasis remains unchanged in the Clec16a KD NOD mouse and plays no role in disease protection. Clec16a and Dexi presented similar expression levels, but further studies are required to investigate a clear link between these two genes. Finally, impaired autophagy could be replicated in human CLEC16A KD cells, which demonstrates a conserved function of CLEC16A and suggests a possible link between CLEC16A variation and risk of autoimmune disease in human.